01.06.2014 Views

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VIII. 4. THE MEASUREMENT PROBLEM IN THE NARROW SENSE 171<br />

iff its state is in a mixture of eigenstates of the operator A which, according to the observables<br />

postulate, corresponds to A.<br />

These postulates speak about the existence of properties, about physical quantities having values,<br />

independent of a measurement or a measuring context.<br />

EXERCISE 37. Discuss the link between the property postulates and the sufficient condition of<br />

reality EPR(EPR) of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen, section I. 2, p. 12, ff.<br />

From this point of view it would be good to have a quantum mechanical description of the measurement<br />

process in which, in any case, the measuring apparatus has a certain property after completion<br />

of the measurement. This means that, instead of the superposition (VIII. 4), we require, as a final<br />

state, the mixture<br />

W ′ =<br />

N∑<br />

|c j | 2 |a j ⟩ ⊗ |r j ⟩ ⟨a j | ⊗ ⟨r j |. (VIII. 13)<br />

j=1<br />

Some authors, e.g. Landau and Lifshitz (1958, pp. 21 - 24), go still further and require as a final<br />

state an eigenstate |r k ⟩ of the pointer quantity R, corresponding to the pointer position found after<br />

measurement. According to them the measuring interaction finishes with an indeterministic jump,<br />

with probability |c j | 2 , to one of the states |a j ⟩ ⊗ |r j ⟩.<br />

Summarizing, we have the following options for the description of the measurement process. For<br />

the initial state there is no comtroversy,<br />

|ψ⟩ ⊗ |r 0 ⟩ =<br />

N S ∑<br />

j=1<br />

For the final state there are three possibilities,<br />

c j |a j ⟩ ⊗ |r 0 ⟩. (VIII. 14)<br />

1.<br />

N S ∑<br />

j=1<br />

c j |a j ⟩ ⊗ |r j ⟩, (VIII. 15)<br />

2. W ′ = ∑ j<br />

|c j | 2 |a j ⟩ ⊗ |r j ⟩ ⟨a j | ⊗ ⟨r j |, (VIII. 16)<br />

3. |a j ⟩ ⊗ |r j ⟩ with probability |c j | 2 . (VIII. 17)<br />

According to the foregoing line of reasoning we require that, at the end of a measuring interaction,<br />

the pointer of the measuring apparatus, which is of course macroscopic, designates something.<br />

The state (VIII. 15) does not satisfy this requirement, on the contrary, the quantum mechanical superposition<br />

|ψ⟩ of eigenstates |a j ⟩ of the quantity that is measured and which prohibited us to ascribe,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!