01.06.2014 Views

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

130 CHAPTER VI. BOHMIAN <strong>MECHANICS</strong><br />

EXAMPLE<br />

A particle sits in a 1 - dimensional ‘box’ of length L, having walls which are formed by infinitely<br />

high potential barriers. Quantum mechanics gives as stationary solutions<br />

ψ n (q, t) = ψ n (q) e − i En t , (VI. 9)<br />

with<br />

ψ n (q) =<br />

√<br />

2<br />

( nπq<br />

)<br />

L sin , q ∈ [0, L], (VI. 10)<br />

L<br />

and energy values<br />

E n =<br />

2<br />

2 m<br />

( n π<br />

) 2<br />

. (VI. 11)<br />

L<br />

Therefore, in Bohmian mechanics for a stationary state we have<br />

R n (q, t) = ψ n (q) and S n (q, t) = − E n t. (VI. 12)<br />

Now it is surprising that in this example it holds that<br />

p = ∂S n<br />

∂q<br />

= ∂(− E n t)<br />

∂q<br />

= 0, (VI. 13)<br />

i.e., according to Bohmian mechanics the particle is motionless. This also applies to other cases of<br />

stationary states, for example to the ground state of the hydrogen atom. It is in straight contradiction<br />

to the statements of quantum mechanics. After all, in the case of the box quantum mechanics<br />

assigns, if the particle is in the state ψ n , a large probability to finding the momentum p having values<br />

around ±nπ<br />

L<br />

, in which case the particle moves with p m<br />

> 0, although the quantum mechanical<br />

expectation value of p is zero for the particle in the box.<br />

This example shows that the statements of quantum mechanics and Bohmian mechanics do not<br />

coincide for all quantities. They only correspond concerning probability distributions for position<br />

measurements. Bohmian mechanics is, therefore, not a HVT in the sense of chapter V, where it was<br />

assumed that the statements of such a theory are similar to the statements of quantum mechanics for<br />

all quantities. Von Neumann’s impossibility proof is therefore not applicable to Bohmian mechanics.<br />

The explanation of the discrepancy between Bohmian mechanics and quantum mechanics lies, of<br />

course, in the use of the quantum potential. According to Bohm, the energy of the particle in the box<br />

has been entirely stored in the form of potential energy as a result of the quantum potential, hence,<br />

the particle has no kinetic energy.<br />

This changes however as soon as we open the box by removing one or both barriers. The quantum<br />

potential energy is again released, and the particle will start to move. The wave packet ψ(⃗q, t) then<br />

spreads out in space, in exactly the same way as prescribed by the Schrödinger equation, and there<br />

is no difference anymore between the statements of both theories concerning the movement of the<br />

particle.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!