01.06.2014 Views

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62 CHAPTER III. THE POSTULATES<br />

system. Consequently, the state of the entire system can, generally, not be derived from measurements<br />

on the separate subsystems. 4<br />

If the partial traces of W = W 1<br />

⊗ W 2 are both pure, W is also pure, as we saw in the exercise<br />

on p. 56, and since the pure partial traces each have only one term W is of the form |u⟩ ⟨u| ⊗ |v⟩ ⟨v|.<br />

On the other hand, a pure state in H is, generally, not factorizable, which we will show in an example.<br />

EXAMPLE<br />

If |u i ⟩ and |v j ⟩ span a basis in H I and H II , respectively, an arbitrary vector |ψ⟩ in H = H I ⊗ H II<br />

is of the form<br />

|ψ⟩ =<br />

∑N I<br />

∑N II<br />

i=1 j=1<br />

c ij |u i ⟩ ⊗ |v j ⟩. (III. 98)<br />

An arbitrary pure state in H is therefore of the form<br />

|ψ⟩ ⟨ψ| =<br />

∑N I<br />

∑N II<br />

∑N I<br />

∑N II<br />

i=1 j=1 k=1 l=1<br />

Consider the following pure entangled state in H,<br />

c ∗ kl c ij<br />

(<br />

|ui ⟩ ⊗ |v j ⟩ )( ⟨u k | ⊗ ⟨v l | ) . (III. 99)<br />

|Φ⟩ = 1 2<br />

√<br />

2<br />

(<br />

|u1 ⟩ ⊗ |v 1 ⟩ + |u 2 ⟩ ⊗ |v 2 ⟩ ) . (III. 100)<br />

The corresponding W is the 1 - dimensional projector<br />

(<br />

W = |Φ⟩ ⟨Φ| = 1 2 |u1 ⟩ ⟨u 1 | ⊗ |v 1 ⟩ ⟨v 1 | + |u 1 ⟩ ⟨u 2 | ⊗ |v 1 ⟩ ⟨v 2 |<br />

+ |u 2 ⟩ ⟨u 1 | ⊗ |v 2 ⟩ ⟨v 1 | + |u 2 ⟩ ⟨u 2 | ⊗ |v 2 ⟩ ⟨v 2 | ) . (III. 101)<br />

This pure state W is not factorizable, and cannot be written in the form (III. 93). But although W<br />

is pure, its partial traces are not pure,<br />

Tr II W =<br />

Tr I W =<br />

∑N II<br />

(<br />

⟨v j | Φ⟩ ⟨Φ | v j ⟩ = 1 2 |u1 ⟩ ⟨u 1 | + |u 2 ⟩ ⟨u 2 | ) , (III. 102)<br />

j=1<br />

∑N I<br />

i=1<br />

⟨u i | Φ⟩ ⟨Φ | u i ⟩ = 1 2<br />

(<br />

|v1 ⟩ ⟨v 1 | + |v 2 ⟩ ⟨v 2 | ) , (III. 103)<br />

and indeed,<br />

W I ⊗ W II = 1 4<br />

(<br />

|u1 ⟩ ⟨u 1 | ⊗ |v 1 ⟩ ⟨v 1 | + |u 1 ⟩ ⟨u 1 | ⊗ |v 2 ⟩ ⟨v 2 | +<br />

|u 2 ⟩ ⟨u 2 | ⊗ |v 1 ⟩ ⟨v 1 | + |u 2 ⟩ ⟨u 2 | ⊗ |v 2 ⟩ ⟨v 2 | ) ≠ W. (III. 104)<br />

4 This aspect of the quantum mechanical state description is, however, analogous to a classical state description with a<br />

probability distribution. The two - particle distribution function ρ(q 1 , p 1 ; q 2 , p 2 ) is not uniquely defined by the marginal<br />

distribution functions<br />

∫<br />

∫<br />

ρ 1 (q 1 , p 1 ) = ρ(q 1 , p 1 ; q 2 , p 2 ) dq 2 dp 2 and ρ 2 (q 2 , p 2 ) = ρ(q 1 , p 1 ; q 2 , p 2 ) dq 1 dp 1 ,<br />

the marginals are, after all, analogous to the partial traces.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!