01.06.2014 Views

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IV. 3. DEBATE BETWEEN EINSTEIN EN BOHR 91<br />

Upon closure of the shutter we have, according to Einstein, a choice: either we weigh the box<br />

again and determine how much mass has vanished so that we can, using the relation E = m c 2 ,<br />

retrieve the energy of the escaped photon, or we open the box and read off the clock mechanism to<br />

determine when the shutter has been opened, which enables us to predict the time of exit of the photon<br />

and therefore its time of arrival at a remote detector. We can choose between both options long after<br />

the photon has left.<br />

Bohr’s answer is not entirely clear. It may be assumed that he did not understand Einstein’s<br />

intentions correctly. 1 He explains Einstein’s objection as an attempt to refute the uncertainty relation<br />

between energy and time; he shows that both determinations cannot possibly be made at the same<br />

time.<br />

Bohr reasons as follows. Assume that the box hangs in equilibrium from a spring in a gravitational<br />

field. When in a time interval T a mass δm escapes, it receives an upward impulse F ∆t of magnitude<br />

g δm T. (IV. 9)<br />

We can keep T finite by, at some moment, hanging a small weight to the box to compensate for the<br />

loss of mass. Suppose we want to determine the mass of the photon by measuring this momentum<br />

transfer then, again, the momentum of the box at the start of the experiment must be exactly known,<br />

δp g δm T. (IV. 10)<br />

But now the same argument applies as used in the double slit experiment. This precise determination<br />

of momentum is only possible if the fixation of the position of the box is given up. The box itself<br />

must be considered a quantum mechanical object, and therefore the uncertainty relation δ pδ q h<br />

applies to it. The position of the box is unknown with an uncertainty of magnitude<br />

δq <br />

<br />

g δm T<br />

(IV. 11)<br />

from which it follows that the gravitational potential ϕ g to which the clock is exposed is also uncertain,<br />

δϕ g ≃ g δq <br />

. (IV. 12)<br />

δm T<br />

But according to the red shift formula from the general theory of relativity (!) the pace of a clock is<br />

influenced by the gravitational potential,<br />

∆T<br />

T<br />

= δϕ g<br />

, (IV. 13)<br />

c2 therefore, the pace of the clock is also uncertain, and consequently the time of opening of the clock is<br />

unknown. Under the circumstances in which we can determine the energy of the photon, we cannot<br />

retrieve its exit time exactly.<br />

Although Bohr seems to rebuke Einstein with his own theory, Bohr’s answer evokes, among other<br />

things, the question whether it is appropriate that the correctness of quantum mechanics relies on<br />

the correctness of the general theory of relativity, which is a classical theory, and is, strictly spoken,<br />

contradictory to quantum mechanics.<br />

1 That Einstein indeed had the intention to point out the freedom of choice is apparent in a letter to Bohr from Paul<br />

Ehrenfest, who heard the argument from Einstein earlier.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!