FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IV. 3. DEBATE BETWEEN EINSTEIN EN BOHR 91<br />
Upon closure of the shutter we have, according to Einstein, a choice: either we weigh the box<br />
again and determine how much mass has vanished so that we can, using the relation E = m c 2 ,<br />
retrieve the energy of the escaped photon, or we open the box and read off the clock mechanism to<br />
determine when the shutter has been opened, which enables us to predict the time of exit of the photon<br />
and therefore its time of arrival at a remote detector. We can choose between both options long after<br />
the photon has left.<br />
Bohr’s answer is not entirely clear. It may be assumed that he did not understand Einstein’s<br />
intentions correctly. 1 He explains Einstein’s objection as an attempt to refute the uncertainty relation<br />
between energy and time; he shows that both determinations cannot possibly be made at the same<br />
time.<br />
Bohr reasons as follows. Assume that the box hangs in equilibrium from a spring in a gravitational<br />
field. When in a time interval T a mass δm escapes, it receives an upward impulse F ∆t of magnitude<br />
g δm T. (IV. 9)<br />
We can keep T finite by, at some moment, hanging a small weight to the box to compensate for the<br />
loss of mass. Suppose we want to determine the mass of the photon by measuring this momentum<br />
transfer then, again, the momentum of the box at the start of the experiment must be exactly known,<br />
δp g δm T. (IV. 10)<br />
But now the same argument applies as used in the double slit experiment. This precise determination<br />
of momentum is only possible if the fixation of the position of the box is given up. The box itself<br />
must be considered a quantum mechanical object, and therefore the uncertainty relation δ pδ q h<br />
applies to it. The position of the box is unknown with an uncertainty of magnitude<br />
δq <br />
<br />
g δm T<br />
(IV. 11)<br />
from which it follows that the gravitational potential ϕ g to which the clock is exposed is also uncertain,<br />
δϕ g ≃ g δq <br />
. (IV. 12)<br />
δm T<br />
But according to the red shift formula from the general theory of relativity (!) the pace of a clock is<br />
influenced by the gravitational potential,<br />
∆T<br />
T<br />
= δϕ g<br />
, (IV. 13)<br />
c2 therefore, the pace of the clock is also uncertain, and consequently the time of opening of the clock is<br />
unknown. Under the circumstances in which we can determine the energy of the photon, we cannot<br />
retrieve its exit time exactly.<br />
Although Bohr seems to rebuke Einstein with his own theory, Bohr’s answer evokes, among other<br />
things, the question whether it is appropriate that the correctness of quantum mechanics relies on<br />
the correctness of the general theory of relativity, which is a classical theory, and is, strictly spoken,<br />
contradictory to quantum mechanics.<br />
1 That Einstein indeed had the intention to point out the freedom of choice is apparent in a letter to Bohr from Paul<br />
Ehrenfest, who heard the argument from Einstein earlier.