17.06.2014 Views

From Leaving CertiFiCate to Leaving SChooL a Longitudinal Study ...

From Leaving CertiFiCate to Leaving SChooL a Longitudinal Study ...

From Leaving CertiFiCate to Leaving SChooL a Longitudinal Study ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

114<br />

<strong>From</strong> <strong>Leaving</strong> Certificate <strong>to</strong> <strong>Leaving</strong> School<br />

reported enjoying their first year subjects more than their primary school<br />

subjects also achieve higher exam grades (17.2 compared with 14.3 for<br />

those who do not).<br />

Figure 4.12: <strong>Leaving</strong> Certificate grade point average by class<br />

allocation at junior cycle<br />

G<br />

P<br />

A<br />

V<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Mixed ability Higher stream Middle stream Lower stream<br />

Class at junior cycle<br />

The frequency of positive and negative interaction with teachers was<br />

measured over the course of the schooling career (see Chapter Two). No<br />

significant relationship is found between positive interaction at junior<br />

cycle and <strong>Leaving</strong> Certificate performance. However, positive interaction<br />

in fifth and sixth year is positively related <strong>to</strong> <strong>Leaving</strong> Certificate<br />

grades (+0.15 and +0.18 respectively). The pattern for negative interaction<br />

is quite different. Negative interaction with teachers across all years<br />

(except the beginning of first year) is negatively related <strong>to</strong> <strong>Leaving</strong> Certificate<br />

performance (with correlations of -0.24 <strong>to</strong> -0.34). The relationship<br />

between negative interaction in second year and grades is almost as<br />

strong as that between negative interaction in sixth year and grades. This<br />

provides further support <strong>to</strong> our previous findings that second year experiences<br />

are central <strong>to</strong> establishing the dynamics of teacher-student interaction<br />

and thus impact on school engagement and performance at a<br />

later stage (see Smyth et al., 2007). Given the interrelationship between<br />

negative teacher-student interaction and student misbehaviour, it is not<br />

surprising that misbehaviour is also associated with underperformance at

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!