17.06.2014 Views

From Leaving CertiFiCate to Leaving SChooL a Longitudinal Study ...

From Leaving CertiFiCate to Leaving SChooL a Longitudinal Study ...

From Leaving CertiFiCate to Leaving SChooL a Longitudinal Study ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

xviii<br />

<strong>From</strong> <strong>Leaving</strong> Certificate <strong>to</strong> <strong>Leaving</strong> School<br />

key influences on later outcomes. The analysis shows that those who had<br />

difficulty coping with schoolwork in second year achieved lower <strong>Leaving</strong><br />

Certificate grades, all else being equal. In addition, the use of streaming,<br />

whereby students were allocated <strong>to</strong> ‘higher’ or ‘lower’ ability<br />

classes for all of their junior cycle subjects, resulted in significantly<br />

lower <strong>Leaving</strong> Certificate grades for students in lower stream classes,<br />

without any corresponding achievement gain for those in higher stream<br />

classes. Our findings show that Junior and <strong>Leaving</strong> Certificate exam<br />

grades are highly correlated, so many students who achieve lower grades<br />

in the Junior Certificate exam do not regain ground when they reach senior<br />

cycle. Students’ social and work lives outside school can also operate<br />

as an impediment <strong>to</strong> later achievement. Not surprisingly, given the focus<br />

on ‘learning for the exam’, students who spend more time on homework<br />

and study in sixth year achieve higher grades. However, those who spend<br />

considerable amounts of time on homework (over four or five hours) do<br />

not achieve an advantage over those spending moderate amounts of time<br />

on homework.<br />

Guidance and Student Decision-Making<br />

In sixth year, students regard their parents, particularly their mothers,<br />

as the most important source of advice in terms of their post-school<br />

plans. Siblings and wider family networks also contributed <strong>to</strong> shaping<br />

decisions around post-school education or employment. In terms of<br />

formal school guidance, our findings show wide variation in the nature<br />

and amount of guidance provided <strong>to</strong> students. Although students were<br />

generally positive about guidance provision, they were often critical of<br />

the lack of time made available for guidance classes or individual guidance<br />

sessions. An important issue that emerged was the timing of guidance<br />

provision, with many students feeling that it had been provided<br />

<strong>to</strong>o late and at a time when they had already chosen their subjects and<br />

subject levels. Other students criticised the way in which guidance provision<br />

over-emphasised higher education as a post-school pathway,<br />

with less information provided on Post-<strong>Leaving</strong> Certificate courses,<br />

apprenticeships and employment.<br />

While higher education was the intended route for the majority of<br />

students, working-class students were much less likely <strong>to</strong> plan <strong>to</strong> go on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!