21.06.2014 Views

Subsampling estimates of the Lasso distribution.

Subsampling estimates of the Lasso distribution.

Subsampling estimates of the Lasso distribution.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8 Minimizers <strong>of</strong> convex processes<br />

Remark. Weak convergence is also defined for convergence toward a Borel measurable<br />

map X defined on a probability space (Ω, A, P ) by taking L := P ◦ X −1 , this is denoted<br />

by X n X. Note that, while measurability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maps X n has been dropped, it remains<br />

mandatory for <strong>the</strong> limit X.<br />

The Portmanteau <strong>the</strong>orem and <strong>the</strong> continuous mapping are essential tools in asymptotic<br />

statistics. They remain valid in this general framework. Their pro<strong>of</strong> are omitted but can<br />

be found in <strong>the</strong> references.<br />

Theorem 2.2.1.2. (Van der Vaart and Wellner, 1996, Theorem 1.3.4) Let {X n } n be a<br />

sequence <strong>of</strong> arbitrary random maps and let L be a Borel measure. The following statements<br />

are equivalent :<br />

(i) X n L;<br />

(ii) lim inf P ∗ (X n ∈ G) ≥ L(G) for every open G;<br />

(iii) lim sup P ∗ (X n ∈ F ) ≤ L(F ) for every closed F;<br />

(iv) lim P ∗ (X n ∈ B) = lim P ∗ (X n ∈ B) = L(B) for every Borel L-continuous set B, that<br />

is B with L(∂B) = 0 ;<br />

(v) lim inf E ∗ f(X n ) ≥ ∫ fdL for every bonded, Lipschitz continuous, nonnegative function<br />

f.<br />

Theorem 2.2.1.3. (Van der Vaart and Wellner, 1996, Theorem 1.3.6) Let g : D → E be<br />

continous at every point in a set D 0 ⊂ D. If X n X and X takes its values in D 0 , <strong>the</strong>n<br />

g(X n ) g(X).<br />

Definition 2.2.1.4. A Borel probability measure L is called tight if for every ε > 0, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

exists a compact set K ⊂ D with L(K) ≥ 1 − ε. A Borel measurable map X : Ω → D is<br />

called tight if its law P ◦ X −1 is tight.<br />

Next, we want to state Prohorov’s <strong>the</strong>orem which is a fundamental result in weak convergence<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory, it associates sequential compactness (with respect to weak convergence) to<br />

<strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> tightness, hence giving conditions for <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> a weak limit. In <strong>the</strong><br />

present setting, <strong>the</strong> statement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> result requires introducing <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> asymptotic<br />

measurability first.<br />

Definition 2.2.1.5. (Asymptotic measurability and tightness) A sequence <strong>of</strong> arbitrary<br />

random maps {X n : Ω n → D} n is asymptotically measurable if and only if<br />

E ∗ f(X n ) − E ∗ f(X n ) → 0,<br />

for every f ∈ C b (D).<br />

The sequence {X n } n is called asymptotically tight if for every ε > 0, <strong>the</strong>re exists a compact<br />

set K such that<br />

lim inf<br />

n→∞ P ∗(X n ∈ K δ ) ≥ 1 − ε, for every δ > 0.<br />

Here, K δ = {y ∈ D | d(x, K) < δ} is <strong>the</strong> δ-enlargement around K, an open set.<br />

Remark. One can show that for a sequence {X n } n <strong>of</strong> Borel measurable maps, asymptotic<br />

tightness and <strong>the</strong> usual uniform tighness, that is, <strong>the</strong> existence for every ε > 0 <strong>of</strong> a compact<br />

set K ⊂ D satisfying P (X n ∈ K) ≥ 1 − ε for every n ∈ N, are equivalent.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!