- Page 1 and 2:
2006 NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AN
- Page 3 and 4:
Preface This report documents the m
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents Chapter Page Pref
- Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents (continued) Appen
- Page 9 and 10:
List of Tables Table Page Table 1.1
- Page 11 and 12:
List of Tables (continued) Table Pa
- Page 13 and 14:
List of Exhibits Exhibit Page Exhib
- Page 15 and 16:
CBSA DU ev GEM Half step Household-
- Page 17 and 18:
1. Introduction Traditionally, most
- Page 19 and 20:
produced a priori. It was anticipat
- Page 21:
to perform some treatment (such as
- Page 24 and 25:
P hij ( ) ⎡P P ⎤⎡ 1 1 ⎤ hi
- Page 26 and 27:
The QDU selection probability was d
- Page 29 and 30:
3. Brief Description of the General
- Page 31 and 32:
4. Predictor Variables for the Ques
- Page 33 and 34:
Exhibit 4.1 Definitions of Levels f
- Page 35:
Exhibit 4.2 Definitions of Levels f
- Page 38 and 39:
e. Youth Only; f. Young Adult Only;
- Page 41 and 42:
6. Editing and Imputation of Pair R
- Page 43 and 44:
from other pair members was sometim
- Page 45 and 46:
Table 6.1 Levels of the Variable PA
- Page 47 and 48:
Table 6.3 Measures of the Quality o
- Page 49 and 50:
identified pair member "A" as "othe
- Page 51 and 52:
performed at the household level ra
- Page 53 and 54:
pair member's roster and another pa
- Page 55 and 56: Table 6.6 Age Group Pair Number Age
- Page 57 and 58: 13. MSA (metropolitan statistical a
- Page 59 and 60: different ways depending upon the a
- Page 61 and 62: 5. parent-child (child 12 to 17), p
- Page 63 and 64: ecause, even though the parent-chil
- Page 65 and 66: collapsed with the two-parent house
- Page 67 and 68: Sibling-sibling pairs. The likeness
- Page 69 and 70: with children) lived within the hou
- Page 71 and 72: 6.4.1.2 Sibling-Sibling Domains Whe
- Page 73 and 74: 4. The respondent had a child and a
- Page 75 and 76: parent-focus and child-focus counts
- Page 77 and 78: the random imputation described ear
- Page 79 and 80: 6.4.3.3.3 Spouse-Spouse Counts For
- Page 81 and 82: 7. Weight Calibration at Questionna
- Page 83 and 84: Exhibit 7.2 Summary of 2006 NSDUH P
- Page 85 and 86: Table 7.1 Model Group QDU Sample Si
- Page 87 and 88: 7.2.5 QDU Weight Component #15: Res
- Page 89 and 90: 8. Evaluation of Calibration Weight
- Page 91 and 92: 8.5 Sensitivity Analysis of Drug Us
- Page 93 and 94: Table 8.2a Percentages of Youths (1
- Page 95 and 96: Table 8.3a Percentages of Youths (1
- Page 97 and 98: Table 8.4 Percentages of Youths (12
- Page 99 and 100: Table 8.6a Percentages of Youths (1
- Page 101 and 102: Table 8.7a Percentages of Youths (1
- Page 103 and 104: References Ault, K., Aldworth, J.,
- Page 105: Singh, A., Grau, E., & Folsom, R.,
- Page 109 and 110: Appendix A: Technical Details about
- Page 111 and 112: Then, for Newton-Raphson iteration
- Page 113 and 114: Appendix B: Derivation of Poststrat
- Page 115 and 116: Appendix B: Derivation of Poststrat
- Page 117 and 118: B.1.2.2 Adjusting QDU-Level Data to
- Page 119 and 120: Appendix C: GEM Modeling Summary fo
- Page 121 and 122: Introduction Appendix C: GEM Modeli
- Page 123 and 124: Exhibit C.1 Definitions of Levels f
- Page 125 and 126: C.2 Glossary of Terms Used in the D
- Page 127 and 128: This is the cross-classification ta
- Page 129 and 130: Drop (3,*,*); conv. Coll. (4,1,2) &
- Page 131 and 132: Appendix C.1: Model Group 1: Northe
- Page 133 and 134: Table C.1a 2006 QDU Weight GEM Mode
- Page 135 and 136: Model Group 1 Overview Selected Que
- Page 137 and 138: Exhibit C.1.2 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 139 and 140: Appendix C.2: Model Group 2: Midwes
- Page 141 and 142: Table C.2a 2006 QDU Weight GEM Mode
- Page 143 and 144: Model Group 2 Overview Selected Que
- Page 145 and 146: Exhibit C.2.2 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 147 and 148: Appendix C.3: Model Group 3: South
- Page 149 and 150: Table C.3a 2006 QDU Weight GEM Mode
- Page 151 and 152: Model Group 3 Overview Selected Que
- Page 153 and 154: Exhibit C.3.2 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 155 and 156: Appendix C.4: Model Group 4: West (
- Page 157 and 158:
Table C.4a 2006 QDU Weight GEM Mode
- Page 159 and 160:
Model Group 4 Overview Selected Que
- Page 161 and 162:
Exhibit C.4.2 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 163 and 164:
Appendix D: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 165 and 166:
Table D.1 2006 NSDUH QDU-Level Resp
- Page 167 and 168:
Appendix E: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 169 and 170:
E-3 Table E.1 2006 NSDUH Selected Q
- Page 171 and 172:
E-5 Table E.2 2006 NSDUH Respondent
- Page 173 and 174:
Appendix F: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 175 and 176:
Table F.1 2006 NSDUH QDU-Level Slip
- Page 177 and 178:
Appendix G: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 179 and 180:
G-3 Table G.1 2006 NSDUH Selected Q
- Page 181 and 182:
G-5 Table G.2 2006 NSDUH Respondent
- Page 183 and 184:
Appendix H: GEM Modeling Summary fo
- Page 185 and 186:
Appendix H: GEM Modeling Summary fo
- Page 187 and 188:
Exhibit H.1 States 3 Model Group 1:
- Page 189 and 190:
Appendix H.1: Model Group 1: Northe
- Page 191 and 192:
Table H.1a 2006 Pair Weight GEM Mod
- Page 193 and 194:
Selected Pair-Level Poststratificat
- Page 195 and 196:
Exhibit H.1.2 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 197 and 198:
Exhibit H.1.4 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 199 and 200:
Appendix H.2: Model Group 2: Midwes
- Page 201 and 202:
Table H.2a 2006 Pair Weight GEM Mod
- Page 203 and 204:
Selected Pair-Level Poststratificat
- Page 205 and 206:
Exhibit H.2.2 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 207 and 208:
Exhibit H.2.4 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 209 and 210:
Appendix I: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 211 and 212:
Table I.1 2006 NSDUH Person Pair-Le
- Page 213 and 214:
Appendix J: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 215 and 216:
J-3 Table J.1 Domain 2006 NSDUH Sel
- Page 217 and 218:
J-5 Table J.2 2006 NSDUH Respondent
- Page 219 and 220:
J-7 Table J.3 Domain 2006 NSDUH Res
- Page 221 and 222:
Table J.3 2006 NSDUH Respondent Pai
- Page 223 and 224:
Appendix K: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 225 and 226:
Table K.1 Domain 2006 NSDUH Respond
- Page 227 and 228:
Appendix L: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 229 and 230:
L-3 Table L.1 2006 NSDUH Selected P
- Page 231 and 232:
Table L.1 2006 NSDUH Selected Pair-
- Page 233 and 234:
L-7 Table L.2 2006 NSDUH Respondent
- Page 235 and 236:
L-9 Table L.3 2006 NSDUH Respondent
- Page 237 and 238:
Appendix M: Hot-Deck Method of Impu
- Page 239 and 240:
Appendix M: Hot-Deck Method of Impu
- Page 241 and 242:
2 3 2 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1
- Page 243 and 244:
M.5 Unweighted Random Nearest Neigh
- Page 245 and 246:
Appendix N: Univariate and Multivar
- Page 247 and 248:
Appendix N: Univariate and Multivar
- Page 249 and 250:
conditional likelihoods, which then
- Page 251 and 252:
as regression, that quantify the re
- Page 253 and 254:
Appendix O: Rules for Determining P
- Page 255 and 256:
Appendix O: Rules for Determining P
- Page 257 and 258:
Table O.1 Rules for Determining Mat
- Page 259 and 260:
O.2 Rules for Identifying Pair Rela
- Page 261 and 262:
O-9 Table O.2 Priority Condition Ru
- Page 263 and 264:
O-11 Table O.2 Priority Condition 3
- Page 265 and 266:
O-13 Table O.2 Priority Condition 5
- Page 267 and 268:
O-15 Table O.2 Priority Condition 5
- Page 269 and 270:
Appendix P: Priority Conditions for
- Page 271 and 272:
Appendix P: Priority Conditions for
- Page 273 and 274:
Table P.1 Priority Conditions Used
- Page 275 and 276:
Table P.1 Priority Conditions Used
- Page 277 and 278:
P.2. Age Variables Table P.2 illust
- Page 279 and 280:
P-11 Table P.2 Priority Condition,
- Page 281 and 282:
P-13 Table P.2 Priority Condition,
- Page 283 and 284:
P-15 Table P.2 Priority Condition,
- Page 285 and 286:
Table P.2 Priority Condition, Frequ
- Page 287 and 288:
Appendix Q: Pair Relationship, Mult
- Page 289 and 290:
Appendix Q: Pair Relationship, Mult
- Page 291 and 292:
Q.2 Pair Relationship Variables Tab
- Page 293 and 294:
Table Q.1 Model Group 6 (21-25, 21-
- Page 295 and 296:
Q.3 Multiplicities Table Q.2 Pair D
- Page 297 and 298:
Q.4 Household-Level Person Counts T
- Page 299 and 300:
Table Q.3 Pair Domain Sibling (12-1
- Page 301 and 302:
Table Q.4 Pair Domain Parent- Child
- Page 303 and 304:
Table Q.4 Pair Domain Sibling (12-1
- Page 305 and 306:
Appendix R: Conditions Used for Rec
- Page 307 and 308:
Appendix R: Conditions Used for Rec
- Page 309 and 310:
1. If the count of children in the
- Page 311 and 312:
Appendix S: Conditions Used for Rec
- Page 313 and 314:
Appendix S: Conditions Used for Rec
- Page 315 and 316:
included in each other's rosters, b
- Page 317 and 318:
oarder. 37 Selecting either the zer
- Page 319 and 320:
the relevant age range in the house
- Page 321 and 322:
• No situations where both pair m
- Page 323 and 324:
• Neither pair member had bad age
- Page 325 and 326:
the two counts (one count might be
- Page 327 and 328:
pair member, and the pair member's
- Page 329 and 330:
• One pair member was younger tha
- Page 331 and 332:
− The number of roster members be
- Page 333 and 334:
• The pair member with the maximu
- Page 335 and 336:
5. The pair members might both have
- Page 337 and 338:
• The pair relationship was not o