21.06.2014 Views

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pair member, <strong>and</strong> the pair member's younger siblings also lived in the household. In<br />

this case, the nonzero count was selected if the number of immediate family<br />

members (parent, child, sibling, spouse, gr<strong>and</strong>child, gr<strong>and</strong>parent) in the roster for<br />

the pair member with the zero count was less than his or her total household size.<br />

13. In some cases, one pair member called the other pair member a parent or child, but<br />

the other pair member did not reciprocate. In the case of a child who did not<br />

reciprocate the parent's identification of him or her as a child, the child's count was<br />

always less than the parent's count. By the same token, in the case of a parent who<br />

did not reciprocate the child's identification of him or her as a parent, the parent's<br />

count was always less than the child's count. If the pair relationship was imputed to<br />

be "parent-child," then the pair member who did not acknowledge a parent-child<br />

relationship was overruled, <strong>and</strong> the maximum count of the two pair members was<br />

selected as final.<br />

14. If the pair relationship was sibling-sibling <strong>and</strong> the sibling-sibling counts were<br />

associated with the same age range, then the household-level person counts were<br />

obtained using the younger sibling-focus multiplicity counts corresponding to the<br />

appropriate age range.<br />

S.3 Spouse-Spouse Counts (with or without Children)<br />

The multiplicity counts were not useful in the logic for the spouse-spouse household<br />

counts, since the spouse-spouse multiplicity counts were always 1. 40 If the household size was<br />

one, or the number of respondents aged 15 or older in the household was one or zero, then the<br />

final household person count was set to 0 since no spouse-spouse pairs could reside under those<br />

limits. If two family units had been previously identified in the household, the following rules<br />

were used to determine the final household person count:<br />

1. When two different family units were already identified in the household, then two<br />

different parent sets were being referenced (one of the parent sets was often a single<br />

parent). The sum of the two counts (one count might be 0) was used, provided<br />

neither pair member had gr<strong>and</strong>parents or gr<strong>and</strong>children identified. This was to<br />

prevent spouse-spouse pairs from being counted twice, which would happen if<br />

gr<strong>and</strong>parents were also parents of children younger than 18 years of age. If two<br />

family units were multigenerational families, then the final count was obtained by<br />

taking the maximum of the two pair members' counts.<br />

2. It was possible for two different spouse-spouse pairs to be in the household, even<br />

though two different family units had not been identified. The final count was set to<br />

2, even though two family units had not been previously identified, under the<br />

following conditions:<br />

40 In rare cases, an individual might identify two spouses in the household. As noted in Section 6.3, the true<br />

multiplicity count in these cases was not determined; rather, the multiplicity count was set to 1, due to the<br />

complexity of determining the appropriate multiplicity count <strong>and</strong> the rarity of the occurrence of multiple spouses.<br />

S-17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!