Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...
Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...
Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
pair member, <strong>and</strong> the pair member's younger siblings also lived in the household. In<br />
this case, the nonzero count was selected if the number of immediate family<br />
members (parent, child, sibling, spouse, gr<strong>and</strong>child, gr<strong>and</strong>parent) in the roster for<br />
the pair member with the zero count was less than his or her total household size.<br />
13. In some cases, one pair member called the other pair member a parent or child, but<br />
the other pair member did not reciprocate. In the case of a child who did not<br />
reciprocate the parent's identification of him or her as a child, the child's count was<br />
always less than the parent's count. By the same token, in the case of a parent who<br />
did not reciprocate the child's identification of him or her as a parent, the parent's<br />
count was always less than the child's count. If the pair relationship was imputed to<br />
be "parent-child," then the pair member who did not acknowledge a parent-child<br />
relationship was overruled, <strong>and</strong> the maximum count of the two pair members was<br />
selected as final.<br />
14. If the pair relationship was sibling-sibling <strong>and</strong> the sibling-sibling counts were<br />
associated with the same age range, then the household-level person counts were<br />
obtained using the younger sibling-focus multiplicity counts corresponding to the<br />
appropriate age range.<br />
S.3 Spouse-Spouse Counts (with or without Children)<br />
The multiplicity counts were not useful in the logic for the spouse-spouse household<br />
counts, since the spouse-spouse multiplicity counts were always 1. 40 If the household size was<br />
one, or the number of respondents aged 15 or older in the household was one or zero, then the<br />
final household person count was set to 0 since no spouse-spouse pairs could reside under those<br />
limits. If two family units had been previously identified in the household, the following rules<br />
were used to determine the final household person count:<br />
1. When two different family units were already identified in the household, then two<br />
different parent sets were being referenced (one of the parent sets was often a single<br />
parent). The sum of the two counts (one count might be 0) was used, provided<br />
neither pair member had gr<strong>and</strong>parents or gr<strong>and</strong>children identified. This was to<br />
prevent spouse-spouse pairs from being counted twice, which would happen if<br />
gr<strong>and</strong>parents were also parents of children younger than 18 years of age. If two<br />
family units were multigenerational families, then the final count was obtained by<br />
taking the maximum of the two pair members' counts.<br />
2. It was possible for two different spouse-spouse pairs to be in the household, even<br />
though two different family units had not been identified. The final count was set to<br />
2, even though two family units had not been previously identified, under the<br />
following conditions:<br />
40 In rare cases, an individual might identify two spouses in the household. As noted in Section 6.3, the true<br />
multiplicity count in these cases was not determined; rather, the multiplicity count was set to 1, due to the<br />
complexity of determining the appropriate multiplicity count <strong>and</strong> the rarity of the occurrence of multiple spouses.<br />
S-17