21.06.2014 Views

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

13. MSA (metropolitan statistical area),<br />

14. categorical percent Hispanic or Latino in segment,<br />

15. categorical percent black or African American in segment, <strong>and</strong><br />

16. categorical percent owner-occupied households in segment.<br />

In some cases, due to the ages of the pair members, the education, employment status,<br />

<strong>and</strong> marital status did not apply to one or both members of a pair. In order to increase the ability<br />

to obtain convergent models, some of the cells in the categorical covariates were collapsed.<br />

Additional variables defined in Section 6.2.3.2 were used to adjust the weights in the<br />

final response models for each of the 11 age group pairs in those cases where the variables were<br />

nonmissing. The variables follow:<br />

1. number in household aged 0 to 11,<br />

2. number in household aged 12 to 17,<br />

3. number in household aged 18 to 25,<br />

4. number in household aged 26 to 34,<br />

5. number in household aged 35 to 49, <strong>and</strong><br />

6. number in household aged 50+.<br />

In the cases where these variables were all nonmissing, they were put into the pool of<br />

covariates for the final response model in place of HHSIZE. However, there were a h<strong>and</strong>ful of<br />

cases for which these variables could not be determined. In those cases, 11 additional final<br />

response models were fitted without the household composition age count variables listed above,<br />

using the same pool of covariates that were used for the item response propensity models.<br />

Building of models. For age group pairs 0 through 4 <strong>and</strong> 7 through 9, binary logistic<br />

regression models were built. Since there were three outcomes with age group pairs 5, 6, <strong>and</strong> 10,<br />

multinomial polytomous logistic models were fitted for these age group pairs. All the models<br />

incorporated the design pair weights that were ratio adjusted for unit nonresponse (where a pair<br />

was selected but did not respond to the survey) <strong>and</strong> calibrated to account for item nonresponse<br />

(where a pair responded to the survey but the pair relationship was unknown), using the item<br />

response propensity models, as described in Section 6.2.4.1. Naturally, not all of the covariates in<br />

the original pool could be included in each model due to convergence problems. The final set of<br />

covariates corresponding to each model is provided in Appendix Q.<br />

Determination of predicted means. Although models were built using respondent pairs<br />

where the pair relationship was known definitively, predicted probabilities were required for all<br />

pairs. Once the models were fitted, predicted means were determined for both respondent pairs<br />

<strong>and</strong> nonrespondent pairs, using the parameter estimates from the models.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!