Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Table H.2a 2006 Pair Weight GEM Modeling Summary (Model Group 2: Midwest and West)
Extreme Weight Proportions Bounds 4
Modeling Step 1 % Unweighted % Weighted % Winsorized UWE 2 # Covariates 3 Nominal Realized
sel.pr.ps
4.98 12.75 4.23 8.749 212 (0.32, 1.10) (0.32, 1.10)
1.42 4.46 0.85 10.774 204 (0.25, 4.02) (0.26, 4.01)
(0.90, 4.59) (0.90, 4.59)
res.pr.nr
1.47 4.74 0.82 10.485 212 (1.00, 2.20) (1.00, 2.20)
2.29 10.70 2.42 11.115 210 (1.00, 5.00) (1.00, 5.00)
N/A
N/A
res.pr.ps
2.43 14.74 4.35 11.115 222 (0.54, 1.80) (0.55, 1.80)
2.44 13.96 3.14 9.250 209 (0.42, 2.54) (0.43, 2.53)
H-19
res.pr.ev
2.44 13.96 3.14 9.250 222 (0.86, 1.71) (0.86, 1.71)
N/A
N/A
1.12 7.99 1.24 8.875 209 (0.68, 1.81) (0.69, 1.81)
GEM = generalized exponential model.
1 For a key to modeling abbreviations, see Chapter 7, Exhibit 7.1.
2 Unequal weighting effect (UWE) defined as 1 + [(n - 1)/n]*CV 2 , where CV = coefficient of variation of weights.
3 Number of proposed covariates on top line and number finalized after modeling.
4
Nominal bounds are used in defining maximum/minimum values for the GEM adjustment factors. The realized bound is the actual adjustment produced by the modeling. The
first set of bounds listed is for high extreme values, the second for nonextreme, and the third for low extreme values.
N/A
N/A