21.06.2014 Views

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix Q: <strong>Pair</strong> Relationship, Multiplicity, <strong>and</strong> Household<br />

Count Model Summaries<br />

Q.1 Introduction<br />

The tables in this appendix list the covariates used in all the models that were run to<br />

impute missing values in the pair relationship, multiplicity, <strong>and</strong> household count variables. For<br />

each variable or set of variables to which the predictive mean neighborhood (PMN) imputation<br />

method was applied, three models were run: one to adjust the weights for item nonresponse<br />

(response propensity models), <strong>and</strong> a second <strong>and</strong> third to calculate predicted means. In the second<br />

model, household composition was represented by the household size variable HHSIZE, <strong>and</strong> in<br />

the third, household composition was represented by the household composition age count<br />

variables. Imputation was sometimes performed within separate model groups. Thus, separate<br />

tables are required for those model groups.<br />

Section Q.2 deals with the pair relationship variables; Section Q.3 deals with the<br />

multiplicity variables; <strong>and</strong> Section Q.4 deals with the household-level person count variables.<br />

These models were applied at a pair level, whereas some of the variables in the models were<br />

applied at a person level. To differentiate which respondent the person-level variable applied to,<br />

the variable label is followed by a parenthetical "older" or "younger" to refer to the variable<br />

corresponding to the older or younger respondent, respectively. If the respondents in the pair<br />

were the same age, one of the respondents was r<strong>and</strong>omly selected to be "older" or "younger."<br />

Q.1.1 Screener <strong>and</strong> Segment-<strong>Level</strong> Variables<br />

In the PMN procedure, statistical modeling was performed to adjust weights for item<br />

nonresponse <strong>and</strong> also to calculate predicted means in the imputation models. Descriptions of<br />

questionnaire-derived variables are described in detail in Chapter 6 of the main body of the text.<br />

No such descriptions are available for screener <strong>and</strong> segment-level variables, however. The<br />

following screener <strong>and</strong> segment-level variables were used often as covariates in both types of<br />

models for the PMN procedures.<br />

Census Region<br />

The region was a four-level geographic variable recoded from the respondent's State of<br />

residence. The four levels were Northeast, Midwest, South, <strong>and</strong> West.<br />

CBSA<br />

The core-based statistical area (CBSA) 31 variable classifies respondents according to their<br />

living situation, whether it be in a rural or urban area <strong>and</strong>, if urban, the size of the urban area. It<br />

was used to categorize segments where the respondents lived according to modified 2000 census<br />

31 CBSAs, developed in response to st<strong>and</strong>ards put forth by the Office of Management <strong>and</strong> Budget (OMB),<br />

are metropolitan <strong>and</strong> micropolitan areas that were designated using data from the 2000 census. More information<br />

about CBSAs can be retrieved from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/resseg/cbsa.html.<br />

Q-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!