Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...
Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...
Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Appendix Q: <strong>Pair</strong> Relationship, Multiplicity, <strong>and</strong> Household<br />
Count Model Summaries<br />
Q.1 Introduction<br />
The tables in this appendix list the covariates used in all the models that were run to<br />
impute missing values in the pair relationship, multiplicity, <strong>and</strong> household count variables. For<br />
each variable or set of variables to which the predictive mean neighborhood (PMN) imputation<br />
method was applied, three models were run: one to adjust the weights for item nonresponse<br />
(response propensity models), <strong>and</strong> a second <strong>and</strong> third to calculate predicted means. In the second<br />
model, household composition was represented by the household size variable HHSIZE, <strong>and</strong> in<br />
the third, household composition was represented by the household composition age count<br />
variables. Imputation was sometimes performed within separate model groups. Thus, separate<br />
tables are required for those model groups.<br />
Section Q.2 deals with the pair relationship variables; Section Q.3 deals with the<br />
multiplicity variables; <strong>and</strong> Section Q.4 deals with the household-level person count variables.<br />
These models were applied at a pair level, whereas some of the variables in the models were<br />
applied at a person level. To differentiate which respondent the person-level variable applied to,<br />
the variable label is followed by a parenthetical "older" or "younger" to refer to the variable<br />
corresponding to the older or younger respondent, respectively. If the respondents in the pair<br />
were the same age, one of the respondents was r<strong>and</strong>omly selected to be "older" or "younger."<br />
Q.1.1 Screener <strong>and</strong> Segment-<strong>Level</strong> Variables<br />
In the PMN procedure, statistical modeling was performed to adjust weights for item<br />
nonresponse <strong>and</strong> also to calculate predicted means in the imputation models. Descriptions of<br />
questionnaire-derived variables are described in detail in Chapter 6 of the main body of the text.<br />
No such descriptions are available for screener <strong>and</strong> segment-level variables, however. The<br />
following screener <strong>and</strong> segment-level variables were used often as covariates in both types of<br />
models for the PMN procedures.<br />
Census Region<br />
The region was a four-level geographic variable recoded from the respondent's State of<br />
residence. The four levels were Northeast, Midwest, South, <strong>and</strong> West.<br />
CBSA<br />
The core-based statistical area (CBSA) 31 variable classifies respondents according to their<br />
living situation, whether it be in a rural or urban area <strong>and</strong>, if urban, the size of the urban area. It<br />
was used to categorize segments where the respondents lived according to modified 2000 census<br />
31 CBSAs, developed in response to st<strong>and</strong>ards put forth by the Office of Management <strong>and</strong> Budget (OMB),<br />
are metropolitan <strong>and</strong> micropolitan areas that were designated using data from the 2000 census. More information<br />
about CBSAs can be retrieved from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/resseg/cbsa.html.<br />
Q-3