Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...
Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...
Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Appendix O: Rules for Determining <strong>Pair</strong> Relationships<br />
O.1 Rules for Determining Matching <strong>Pair</strong>s, in Priority Order<br />
The following rules are used to determine the roster member in a respondent's household<br />
roster that corresponds to the other pair member. In these rules, an "age match" occurs if the<br />
questionnaire age of one pair member matches a roster age in the other pair member's roster, <strong>and</strong><br />
a "gender match" occurs if the questionnaire gender of one of the pair members matches a roster<br />
gender in the other pair member's roster. In the table below, if the rules for <strong>Pair</strong> Member A <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Pair</strong> Member B in a single row differ, then the count for that row includes the rules as listed, <strong>and</strong><br />
the rules with <strong>Pair</strong> Member A <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pair</strong> Member B are reversed. If the age <strong>and</strong>/or gender are off<br />
when finding these matches, the age <strong>and</strong>/or gender are defined by the questionnaire age <strong>and</strong><br />
gender of the selected pair member when determining the pair domain. The rules, called priority<br />
conditions because of their hierarchical nature, are listed in priority order in Table O.1, along<br />
with the number of pairs to which each rule was applied. Since the 2001 survey, it was<br />
technically impossible to identify more than one roster member as the "other pair member<br />
selected," resulting in either 0 or 1 MBRSEL for each responding pair. Rules involving situations<br />
where more than one MBRSEL existed are therefore not included in this table. Some other<br />
conditions that were not evident in 2006 also are excluded from this table, provided the<br />
distribution of counts would have been unaffected by their exclusion from the code.<br />
Table O.1 Rules for Determining Matching <strong>Pair</strong>s, in Priority Order<br />
Priority<br />
Rule<br />
Condition <strong>Pair</strong> Member A <strong>Pair</strong> Member B Count<br />
1 Age <strong>and</strong> gender match exactly,<br />
exactly one MBRSEL in right place<br />
2 Age <strong>and</strong> gender match exactly,<br />
exactly one MBRSEL in right place<br />
3 Age within one, gender matches<br />
exactly, exactly one MBRSEL in<br />
right place<br />
4 Age <strong>and</strong> gender match exactly,<br />
exactly one MBRSEL in right place<br />
5 Age within one, gender matches<br />
exactly, exactly one MBRSEL in<br />
right place<br />
6 Age within two, gender matches<br />
exactly, exactly one MBRSEL in<br />
right place<br />
Age <strong>and</strong> gender match exactly,<br />
exactly one MBRSEL in right place<br />
Age within one, gender matches<br />
exactly, exactly one MBRSEL in<br />
right place<br />
Age within one, gender matches<br />
exactly, exactly one MBRSEL in<br />
right place<br />
Age within two, gender matches<br />
exactly, exactly one MBRSEL in<br />
right place<br />
Age within two, gender matches<br />
exactly, exactly one MBRSEL in<br />
right place<br />
Age within two, gender matches<br />
exactly, exactly one MBRSEL in<br />
right place<br />
16,590<br />
2,160<br />
131<br />
276<br />
34<br />
10<br />
O-3