21.06.2014 Views

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• If the spouse-spouse counts exceeded the spouse-spouse-with-children counts by<br />

one for each pair member, even though they were unequal to each other, then the<br />

final spouse-spouse-with-children count was set to one less than the final spousespouse<br />

count.<br />

10. Based on earlier conditions, we already excluded households without couples. We<br />

also excluded households with a possibility of two or more couples. If the pair<br />

relationship was parent-child <strong>and</strong> at least one count was nonzero, then the identified<br />

couple corresponded to the parent-child relationship. The maximum of the counts was<br />

selected under the following conditions:<br />

• The sum of counts from the two pair members was 1.<br />

• Either:<br />

− The relationship was parent-child where the child was between the ages of 12<br />

<strong>and</strong> 17, or<br />

− The relationship was parent-child where the child was between the ages of 18<br />

<strong>and</strong> 20 <strong>and</strong> the child had siblings younger than 18.<br />

11. In some cases, two couples were identified in the household where the household was<br />

multigenerational (one member of the younger couple was in a parent-child<br />

relationship with the older couple). If a sibling to the pair member in the younger<br />

couple was selected, or if a member of the younger couple was selected who "married<br />

into" the family, then he or she was not able to identify the nephews, nieces, brothersin-law,<br />

or sisters-in-law––which could point to an appropriate accounting of all the<br />

couples with children––because of the relationship codes that were available. The<br />

maximum of the two counts was selected under the following conditions:<br />

• There were two couples in the household, as identified by the final spouse-spouse<br />

count.<br />

• The difference between the pair members' counts was 1.<br />

• Either:<br />

−<br />

−<br />

The pair member with the smaller count had a spouse or partner <strong>and</strong> the pair<br />

member with the larger count had parents in the household, or<br />

The pair member with the smaller count had parents-in-law or children-in-law<br />

in the household.<br />

12. If a couple was in a marriage/partnership that occurred after an earlier marriage, the<br />

partner might not have considered the partner's children as his or her children, but the<br />

child (who also was selected) considered the spouse/partner a parent. Even though the<br />

pair relationship was not parent-child, these cases were still counted as spouse-spouse<br />

with children since they consisted of the children of one spouse/partner. The<br />

maximum count was selected under the following conditions:<br />

S-26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!