21.06.2014 Views

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B.1.1 <strong>Person</strong> <strong>Level</strong><br />

B.1.1.1 Receiving <strong>and</strong> Deriving <strong>Person</strong>-<strong>Level</strong> Poststratification Control Totals<br />

Civilian, noninstitutionalized population estimates for ages 12 or older were provided by<br />

the Population Estimates Branch of the U.S. Bureau of the Census. We received two files, one at<br />

the national level <strong>and</strong> the other at the State level, each containing estimates of the population<br />

broken down by levels of month (12 levels), Hispanicity (2), race (6), sex (2), <strong>and</strong> age (11).<br />

The breakdown received from the census did not match the levels of the domains that we<br />

wanted to control. To account for this, we collapsed levels. From this altered data, we created<br />

datasets with model group-specific control totals. Observations in these datasets corresponded to<br />

a breakdown by quarter (4), Hispanicity (2), race (5), sex (2), age (11), <strong>and</strong> number of States 26 in<br />

the model group (number of States varied according to which census region was represented in<br />

the model group).<br />

B.1.1.2 Adjusting SDU Data to the Control Totals<br />

In the person-level weighting, the SDU weights were poststratified to meet control totals<br />

based on the population estimates received from the census. For NSDUH weighting, GEM was<br />

utilized to calibrate sample weights to multiple control totals. In doing so, each SDU received an<br />

adjustment factor, which, when multiplied by the initial weight, produced a final weight. The<br />

sum of all final weights corresponded to the civilian, noninstitutionalized population estimate for<br />

ages 12 or older, <strong>and</strong> the sum of all final weights in a domain corresponded to the control total<br />

for that domain. Note that there were a number of controls being calibrated to for each SDU,<br />

depending upon the domains to which the SDU belonged. The adjusted SDU weight reflected the<br />

civilian, noninstitutionalized population estimates for ages 12 or older <strong>and</strong> could be utilized as a<br />

basis for constructing controls at the QDU <strong>and</strong> person pair levels.<br />

B.1.2 QDU <strong>Level</strong><br />

B.1.2.1 Deriving QDU-<strong>Level</strong> Poststratification Control Totals from Adjusted SDU Weights<br />

Since there were no controls for QDU-level poststratification available directly, we used<br />

the adjusted SDU weights. For these weights to be applicable at the QDU level, the SDU-level<br />

data had to be restructured by sorting <strong>and</strong> summing over the domains to be used in the QDUlevel<br />

calibration. This provided a dataset where the summed weight, which still added up to the<br />

proper population, was available for every domain to be utilized in the QDU calibration <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

could be used as a control total.<br />

26 The District of Columbia is included among States.<br />

B-4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!