21.06.2014 Views

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

−<br />

The number of roster members between the ages of 40 <strong>and</strong> 59 was the same<br />

between the two pair members.<br />

• If the side associated with the nonzero count identified two gr<strong>and</strong>parents, the<br />

following additional condition was required:<br />

−<br />

The number of roster members aged 50 or older was the same between the<br />

two pair members.<br />

11. The counts might not agree because a pair member's partner did not consider the<br />

other pair member’s family as his or her own family. If at least one side identified a<br />

partner <strong>and</strong> the maximum count was 1, then the maximum was selected if both pair<br />

members had the same number of household members aged 15 or older. Otherwise, if<br />

the pair members had a different number of household members aged 15 or older, the<br />

count belonging to the pair member with a count of household members aged 15 or<br />

older closer to that of the screener was used as the final count.<br />

12. The counts might not agree because a pair member had two gr<strong>and</strong>parents <strong>and</strong> an<br />

uncle/aunt husb<strong>and</strong>-wife pair in the household. The maximum was selected if the pair<br />

member associated with the smaller count had a gr<strong>and</strong>parent <strong>and</strong> had at least two<br />

roster members who were neither parents, siblings, children, spouses, partners, or<br />

gr<strong>and</strong>parents, <strong>and</strong> the pair member with the larger count had children-in-law.<br />

13. The count of the number of spouse-spouse pairs might not agree because one of the<br />

pairs was a sibling <strong>and</strong> sibling-in-law, <strong>and</strong> there are no codes for sibling-in-law. The<br />

maximum count was selected if the pair member with the smaller count did not have<br />

a spouse or partner but did have siblings aged 15 or older, <strong>and</strong> there were household<br />

members in his or her roster that were not parents, children, siblings, spouses,<br />

partners, gr<strong>and</strong>children, or gr<strong>and</strong>parents.<br />

14. The count of the number of spouse-spouse pairs might not agree because one side had<br />

no nuclear family or gr<strong>and</strong>parent-gr<strong>and</strong>child relationship codes, <strong>and</strong> one of the<br />

selected respondents was not in a child-parent, child-gr<strong>and</strong>parent, or spouse-spouse<br />

relationship. The maximum count was selected if the following conditions were met:<br />

• The pair member's roster associated with the minimum count (usually 0) had no<br />

children, parents, siblings, spouses, partners, gr<strong>and</strong>children, or gr<strong>and</strong>parents<br />

among respondents aged 12 or older, <strong>and</strong><br />

• The pair member's roster associated with the maximum count had some roster<br />

members who were not children, parents, siblings, spouses, partners,<br />

gr<strong>and</strong>children, or gr<strong>and</strong>parents.<br />

Note that this condition also nabbed cases where the relationship codes were not<br />

correctly identified on one pair member's roster. This occurred rarely, but when it did,<br />

the minimum count was 1 <strong>and</strong> the maximum count was 2.<br />

S-21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!