21.06.2014 Views

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

oarder. 37 Selecting either the zero count or nonzero count in this instance required<br />

that the following conditions were met:<br />

• The respondent with a zero count of children with parent(s) in the household did<br />

not identify parents in the roster or he or she identified parents but was older than<br />

20 <strong>and</strong> had no bad relationship codes within the relevant age ranges, <strong>and</strong><br />

• Either the respondent with a nonzero count of children with parent(s) in the<br />

household had siblings or children within the relevant age range, or the<br />

respondent himself or herself was within that age range (with a count of 1).<br />

When one count of children with parent(s) in the household was zero <strong>and</strong> the other<br />

was nonzero, the nonzero count was used under the following conditions:<br />

• The respondent pair member with a nonzero count also did not have bad<br />

relationship codes within the relevant age ranges, <strong>and</strong><br />

• Either:<br />

−<br />

−<br />

−<br />

−<br />

The count of children within the relevant age range in the household for the<br />

nonzero count pair member matched that of the zero count pair member, <strong>and</strong><br />

the count of children with parent(s) in the household did not exceed the<br />

screener count of children within the relevant age range;<br />

The count of children in the household within the relevant age range for the<br />

nonzero count pair member matched that of the screener;<br />

The count of children in the household within the relevant age range for the<br />

zero count pair member matched that of the screener because a child was (or<br />

children were) listed as 11 years old in the nonzero count pair member's<br />

roster, when he or she (they) should have been 12 (according to the nonzero<br />

count pair member's <strong>and</strong> the screener roster) so that the final count was the<br />

nonzero count with this child (these children) added;<br />

The respondent with a zero count had no household members with a familytype<br />

relationship code where the reported household sizes of the two pair<br />

members were equal (indicating that it was unlikely that anyone had entered<br />

or left the household between interviews);<br />

The respondent with a nonzero count showed a parent-child relationship<br />

existed in the household, but the respondent with a zero count did not because<br />

he was not related to the other household members. However, the count of<br />

children within the relevant age range in the household for the zero count was<br />

closer to the screener age count. Nevertheless, the nonzero count was equal to<br />

or less than the screener age count; or<br />

37 Even if there was disagreement between the respondents about whether a boarder or other family<br />

member was in fact a sibling, parent, or child, this would had been resolved at the pair relationship stage where we<br />

would had determined whether this was in a domain of interest.<br />

S-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!