Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Exhibit H.1.1 Covariates for 2006 NSDUH Pair Weights (sel.pr.ps) Model Group 1: Northeast and South Variables Level Proposed Final Comments One-Factor Effects 76 76 Intercept 1 1 1 All levels present. State 26 25 24 All levels present. Quarter 4 3 3 All levels present. Population Density 4 3 3 All levels present. Group Quarter 3 2 2 All levels present. Household Size 3 2 2 All levels present. Pair Age 15 14 14 All levels present. Pair Gender 3 2 2 All levels present. Pair Race/Ethnicity 10 9 9 All levels present. Race/Ethnicity of Householder 6 5 5 All levels present. Rent/Housing 5 4 4 All levels present. Segment % Black or African American 3 2 2 All levels present. Segment % Hispanic or Latino 3 2 2 All levels present. % Owner-Occupied 3 2 2 All levels present. Two-Factor Effects 125 125 Pair Race/Ethnicity (5 Levels) x Pair Age (6 5 x 6 20 20 All levels present. Levels) Pair Race/Ethnicity (5 Levels) x Pair Gender 5 x 3 8 8 All levels present. Pair Gender x Pair Age (6 Levels) 3 x 6 10 10 All levels present. State/Region x Pair Race/Ethnicity (5 Levels) 6 x 5 20 20 All levels present. State/Region x Pair Age (6 Levels) 6 x 6 25 25 All levels present. State/Region x Pair Gender 6 x 3 10 10 All levels present. Rent/Housing x % Black or African American 5 x 3 8 8 All levels present. Rent/Housing x % Hispanic or Latino 5 x 3 8 8 All levels present. Rent/Housing x % Owner-Occupied 5 x 3 8 8 All levels present. % Owner-Occupied x % Black or African 3 x 3 4 4 All levels present. American % Owner-Occupied x % Hispanic or Latino 3 x 3 4 4 All levels present. Three-Factor Effects 12 0 Pair Race/Ethnicity (4 Levels) x Pair Gender x 4 x 3 x 3 12 0 Drop all; conv. Pair Age (3 Levels) Total 213 201 H-12
Exhibit H.1.2 Covariates for 2006 NSDUH Pair Weights (res.pr.nr) Model Group 1: Northeast and South Variables Level Proposed Final Comments One-Factor Effects 76 76 Intercept 1 1 1 All levels present. State 26 25 25 All levels present. Quarter 4 3 3 All levels present. Population Density 4 3 3 All levels present. Group Quarter 3 2 2 All levels present. Household Size 3 2 2 All levels present. Pair Age 15 14 14 All levels present. Pair Gender 3 2 2 All levels present. Pair Race/Ethnicity 10 9 9 All levels present. Race/Ethnicity of Householder 6 5 5 All levels present. Rent/Housing 5 4 4 All levels present. Segment % Black or African American 3 2 2 All levels present. Segment % Hispanic or Latino 3 2 2 All levels present. % Owner-Occupied 3 2 2 All levels present. Two-Factor Effects 125 125 Pair Race/Ethnicity (5 Levels) x Pair Age (6 5 x 6 20 20 All levels present. Levels) Pair Race/Ethnicity (5 Levels) x Pair Gender 5 x 3 8 8 All levels present. Pair Gender x Pair Age (6 Levels) 3 x 6 10 10 All levels present. State/Region x Pair Race/Ethnicity (5 Levels) 6 x 5 20 20 All levels present. State/Region x Pair Age (6 Levels) 6 x 6 25 25 All levels present. State/Region x Pair Gender 6 x 3 10 10 All levels present. Rent/Housing x % Black or African American 5 x 3 8 8 All levels present. Rent/Housing x % Hispanic or Latino 5 x 3 8 8 All levels present. Rent/Housing x % Owner-Occupied 5 x 3 8 8 All levels present. % Owner-Occupied x % Black or African 3 x 3 4 4 All levels present. American % Owner-Occupied x % Hispanic or Latino 3 x 3 4 4 All levels present. Three-Factor Effects 12 12 Pair Race/Ethnicity (4 Levels) x Pair Gender x 4 x 3 x 3 12 12 All levels present. Pair Age (3 Levels) Total 213 213 H-13
Page 1 and 2:
2006 NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AN
Page 3 and 4:
Preface This report documents the m
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents Chapter Page Pref
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents (continued) Appen
Page 9 and 10:
List of Tables Table Page Table 1.1
Page 11 and 12:
List of Tables (continued) Table Pa
Page 13 and 14:
List of Exhibits Exhibit Page Exhib
Page 15 and 16:
CBSA DU ev GEM Half step Household-
Page 17 and 18:
1. Introduction Traditionally, most
Page 19 and 20:
produced a priori. It was anticipat
Page 21:
to perform some treatment (such as
Page 24 and 25:
P hij ( ) ⎡P P ⎤⎡ 1 1 ⎤ hi
Page 26 and 27:
The QDU selection probability was d
Page 29 and 30:
3. Brief Description of the General
Page 31 and 32:
4. Predictor Variables for the Ques
Page 33 and 34:
Exhibit 4.1 Definitions of Levels f
Page 35:
Exhibit 4.2 Definitions of Levels f
Page 38 and 39:
e. Youth Only; f. Young Adult Only;
Page 41 and 42:
6. Editing and Imputation of Pair R
Page 43 and 44:
from other pair members was sometim
Page 45 and 46:
Table 6.1 Levels of the Variable PA
Page 47 and 48:
Table 6.3 Measures of the Quality o
Page 49 and 50:
identified pair member "A" as "othe
Page 51 and 52:
performed at the household level ra
Page 53 and 54:
pair member's roster and another pa
Page 55 and 56:
Table 6.6 Age Group Pair Number Age
Page 57 and 58:
13. MSA (metropolitan statistical a
Page 59 and 60:
different ways depending upon the a
Page 61 and 62:
5. parent-child (child 12 to 17), p
Page 63 and 64:
ecause, even though the parent-chil
Page 65 and 66:
collapsed with the two-parent house
Page 67 and 68:
Sibling-sibling pairs. The likeness
Page 69 and 70:
with children) lived within the hou
Page 71 and 72:
6.4.1.2 Sibling-Sibling Domains Whe
Page 73 and 74:
4. The respondent had a child and a
Page 75 and 76:
parent-focus and child-focus counts
Page 77 and 78:
the random imputation described ear
Page 79 and 80:
6.4.3.3.3 Spouse-Spouse Counts For
Page 81 and 82:
7. Weight Calibration at Questionna
Page 83 and 84:
Exhibit 7.2 Summary of 2006 NSDUH P
Page 85 and 86:
Table 7.1 Model Group QDU Sample Si
Page 87 and 88:
7.2.5 QDU Weight Component #15: Res
Page 89 and 90:
8. Evaluation of Calibration Weight
Page 91 and 92:
8.5 Sensitivity Analysis of Drug Us
Page 93 and 94:
Table 8.2a Percentages of Youths (1
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Table 8.4 Percentages of Youths (12
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
References Ault, K., Aldworth, J.,
Page 105:
Singh, A., Grau, E., & Folsom, R.,
Page 108 and 109:
A-2
Page 110 and 111:
A.2 GEM Adjustments for Extreme-Val
Page 112 and 113:
A-6
Page 114 and 115:
B-2
Page 116 and 117:
B.1.1 Person Level B.1.1.1 Receivin
Page 118 and 119:
B-6
Page 120 and 121:
C-2
Page 122 and 123:
To help understand what effects wer
Page 124 and 125:
Exhibit C.1 Definitions of Levels f
Page 126 and 127:
C.3 How to Interpret Collapsing and
Page 128 and 129:
The number of respondents in that c
Page 130 and 131:
Exhibit C.2 Covariates for 2006 NSD
Page 132 and 133:
C-14
Page 134 and 135:
Table C.1b 2006 Distribution of Wei
Page 136 and 137:
Exhibit C.1.1 Covariates for 2006 N
Page 138 and 139:
Exhibit C.1.3 Covariates for 2006 N
Page 140 and 141:
C-22
Page 142 and 143:
Table C.2b 2006 Distribution of Wei
Page 144 and 145: Exhibit C.2.1 Covariates for 2006 N
Page 148 and 149: C-30
Page 150 and 151: Table C.3b 2006 Distribution of Wei
Page 156 and 157: C-38
Page 158 and 159: Table C.4b 2006 Distribution of Wei
Page 164 and 165: D-2
Page 166 and 167: D-4
Page 168 and 169: E-2
Page 170 and 171: E-4 Table E.1 2006 NSDUH Selected Q
Page 172 and 173: E-6 Table E.2 2006 NSDUH Respondent
Page 174 and 175: F-2
Page 176 and 177: Table F.1 2006 NSDUH QDU-Level Slip
Page 178 and 179: G-2
Page 180 and 181: G-4 Table G.1 2006 NSDUH Selected Q
Page 182 and 183: G-6 Table G.2 2006 NSDUH Respondent
Page 184 and 185: H-2
Page 186 and 187: Exhibit H.1 Definitions of Levels f
Page 188 and 189: Exhibit H.2 Covariates for 2006 NSD
Page 190 and 191: H-8
Page 192 and 193: Table H.1b 2006 Distribution of Wei
Page 196 and 197: Exhibit H.1.3 Covariates for 2006 N
Page 198 and 199: H-16
Page 200 and 201: H-18
Page 202 and 203: Table H.2b 2006 Pair Weight GEM Mod
Page 208 and 209: H-26
Page 210 and 211: I-2
Page 212 and 213: Table I.1 2006 NSDUH Person Pair-Le
Page 214 and 215: J-2
Page 216 and 217: J-4 Table J.1 Domain 2006 NSDUH Sel
Page 218 and 219: J-6 Table J.2 2006 NSDUH Respondent
Page 220 and 221: J-8 Table J.3 Domain 2006 NSDUH Res
Page 222 and 223: J-10
Page 224 and 225: K-2
Page 226 and 227: Table K.1 2006 NSDUH Respondent Pai
Page 228 and 229: L-2
Page 230 and 231: L-4 Table L.1 2006 NSDUH Selected P
Page 232 and 233: L-6 Table L.2 2006 NSDUH Respondent
Page 234 and 235: L-8 Table L.3 2006 NSDUH Respondent
Page 236 and 237: L-10 Table L.3 2006 NSDUH Responden
Page 238 and 239: M-2
Page 240 and 241: procedures were implemented indepen
Page 242 and 243: first sorting variables). In genera
Page 244 and 245:
predicted mean(s), the neighborhood
Page 246 and 247:
N-2
Page 248 and 249:
The PMM method is only applicable t
Page 250 and 251:
type of constraint, called a "logic
Page 252 and 253:
N-8
Page 254 and 255:
O-2
Page 256 and 257:
Table O.1 Rules for Determining Mat
Page 258 and 259:
Table O.1 Rules for Determining Mat
Page 260 and 261:
O-8 Table O.2 Priority Condition Ru
Page 262 and 263:
O-10 Table O.2 Priority Condition 2
Page 264 and 265:
Table O.2 Priority Condition Rules
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
P-2
Page 272 and 273:
P-4 Table P.1 Priority Condition, F
Page 274 and 275:
Table P.1 Priority Conditions Used
Page 276 and 277:
P-8 Table P.1 Priority Condition, F
Page 278 and 279:
P-10 Table P.2 Priority Condition,
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
P-18
Page 288 and 289:
Q-2
Page 290 and 291:
data, which was adjusted to more re
Page 292 and 293:
Table Q.1 Model Group 3 (15-17, 15-
Page 294 and 295:
Table Q.1 Model Group 9 (18-20, 26+
Page 296 and 297:
Table Q.2 Pair Domain Sibling (12-1
Page 298 and 299:
Table Q.3 Model Group Parent- Child
Page 300 and 301:
Table Q.3 Pair Domain Spouse- Spous
Page 302 and 303:
Table Q.4 Pair Domain Sibling (12-1
Page 304 and 305:
Q-18
Page 306 and 307:
R-2
Page 308 and 309:
was not imputed, the indirect count
Page 310 and 311:
1. The counts disagreed if a househ
Page 312 and 313:
S-2
Page 314 and 315:
with parent(s) in the household) fo
Page 316 and 317:
• Both had counts of children wit
Page 318 and 319:
− The other conditions had not al
Page 320 and 321:
• The number of children in the s
Page 322 and 323:
5. Two family units might be in the
Page 324 and 325:
− − No bad relationship codes i
Page 326 and 327:
elationship codes, and the sum of t
Page 328 and 329:
• The pair relationship was not a
Page 330 and 331:
• The screener count of roster me
Page 332 and 333:
15. The count of the number of spou
Page 334 and 335:
member had a spouse-spouse-with-chi
Page 336 and 337:
• If the spouse-spouse counts exc
Page 338:
• The number of roster members yo
show all

Questionnaire Dwelling Unit-Level and Person Pair-Level Sampling ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?