- Page 1 and 2: 2006 NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AN
- Page 3 and 4: Preface This report documents the m
- Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents Chapter Page Pref
- Page 7 and 8: Table of Contents (continued) Appen
- Page 9 and 10: List of Tables Table Page Table 1.1
- Page 11 and 12: List of Tables (continued) Table Pa
- Page 13 and 14: List of Exhibits Exhibit Page Exhib
- Page 15 and 16: CBSA DU ev GEM Half step Household-
- Page 17 and 18: 1. Introduction Traditionally, most
- Page 19 and 20: produced a priori. It was anticipat
- Page 21: to perform some treatment (such as
- Page 24 and 25: P hij ( ) ⎡P P ⎤⎡ 1 1 ⎤ hi
- Page 26 and 27: The QDU selection probability was d
- Page 29 and 30: 3. Brief Description of the General
- Page 31 and 32: 4. Predictor Variables for the Ques
- Page 33 and 34: Exhibit 4.1 Definitions of Levels f
- Page 35: Exhibit 4.2 Definitions of Levels f
- Page 39: State by five age groups (12 to 17,
- Page 42 and 43: (i.e., total of averages over pairs
- Page 44 and 45: Table 6.1 Value of PAIRREL Levels o
- Page 46 and 47: Table 6.2 Measures of the Quality o
- Page 48 and 49: 6.2.2.2 Determining the Pair Relati
- Page 50 and 51: Table 6.4 Value of RELMATCH Values
- Page 52 and 53: should be believed. This decision d
- Page 54 and 55: pair. The widely varying distributi
- Page 56 and 57: Table 6.7 Age Group Pair Number Mod
- Page 58 and 59: 6.2.4.3 Constraints on Hot-Deck Nei
- Page 60 and 61: two used when the only pair relatio
- Page 62 and 63: almost all cases since only one spo
- Page 64 and 65: conducted for the multiplicities as
- Page 66 and 67: Number of household members younger
- Page 68 and 69: 6. parent-child (child 12 to 20), c
- Page 70 and 71: within the relevant age range. If t
- Page 72 and 73: 2. If the age of the respondent was
- Page 74 and 75: If the attempt to reconcile differe
- Page 76 and 77: spouse pairs with children younger
- Page 78 and 79: 6.4.3.3.2 Sibling-Sibling Counts Fo
- Page 80 and 81: should too. Presumably this constra
- Page 82 and 83: assisted in bias reduction, ease of
- Page 84 and 85: Exhibit 7.3 U.S. Bureau of the Cens
- Page 86 and 87:
7.2 QDU Weight Components 7.2.1 QDU
- Page 88 and 89:
7.3.4 Pair Weight Component #14: Re
- Page 90 and 91:
outwinsor percentages represent the
- Page 92 and 93:
76 Table 8.1 Estimates of Totals an
- Page 94 and 95:
Table 8.2b Percentages of Youths (1
- Page 96 and 97:
Table 8.3b Percentages of Youths (1
- Page 98 and 99:
Table 8.5 Percentages of Youths (12
- Page 100 and 101:
Table 8.6b Percentages of Youths (1
- Page 102 and 103:
86 Table 8.7b Drug Any Illicit Perc
- Page 104 and 105:
Folsom, R. E., & Singh, A. C. (2000
- Page 107 and 108:
Appendix A: Technical Details about
- Page 109 and 110:
Appendix A: Technical Details about
- Page 111 and 112:
Then, for Newton-Raphson iteration
- Page 113 and 114:
Appendix B: Derivation of Poststrat
- Page 115 and 116:
Appendix B: Derivation of Poststrat
- Page 117 and 118:
B.1.2.2 Adjusting QDU-Level Data to
- Page 119 and 120:
Appendix C: GEM Modeling Summary fo
- Page 121 and 122:
Introduction Appendix C: GEM Modeli
- Page 123 and 124:
Exhibit C.1 Definitions of Levels f
- Page 125 and 126:
C.2 Glossary of Terms Used in the D
- Page 127 and 128:
This is the cross-classification ta
- Page 129 and 130:
Drop (3,*,*); conv. Coll. (4,1,2) &
- Page 131 and 132:
Appendix C.1: Model Group 1: Northe
- Page 133 and 134:
Table C.1a 2006 QDU Weight GEM Mode
- Page 135 and 136:
Model Group 1 Overview Selected Que
- Page 137 and 138:
Exhibit C.1.2 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 139 and 140:
Appendix C.2: Model Group 2: Midwes
- Page 141 and 142:
Table C.2a 2006 QDU Weight GEM Mode
- Page 143 and 144:
Model Group 2 Overview Selected Que
- Page 145 and 146:
Exhibit C.2.2 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 147 and 148:
Appendix C.3: Model Group 3: South
- Page 149 and 150:
Table C.3a 2006 QDU Weight GEM Mode
- Page 151 and 152:
Model Group 3 Overview Selected Que
- Page 153 and 154:
Exhibit C.3.2 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 155 and 156:
Appendix C.4: Model Group 4: West (
- Page 157 and 158:
Table C.4a 2006 QDU Weight GEM Mode
- Page 159 and 160:
Model Group 4 Overview Selected Que
- Page 161 and 162:
Exhibit C.4.2 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 163 and 164:
Appendix D: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 165 and 166:
Table D.1 2006 NSDUH QDU-Level Resp
- Page 167 and 168:
Appendix E: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 169 and 170:
E-3 Table E.1 2006 NSDUH Selected Q
- Page 171 and 172:
E-5 Table E.2 2006 NSDUH Respondent
- Page 173 and 174:
Appendix F: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 175 and 176:
Table F.1 2006 NSDUH QDU-Level Slip
- Page 177 and 178:
Appendix G: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 179 and 180:
G-3 Table G.1 2006 NSDUH Selected Q
- Page 181 and 182:
G-5 Table G.2 2006 NSDUH Respondent
- Page 183 and 184:
Appendix H: GEM Modeling Summary fo
- Page 185 and 186:
Appendix H: GEM Modeling Summary fo
- Page 187 and 188:
Exhibit H.1 States 3 Model Group 1:
- Page 189 and 190:
Appendix H.1: Model Group 1: Northe
- Page 191 and 192:
Table H.1a 2006 Pair Weight GEM Mod
- Page 193 and 194:
Selected Pair-Level Poststratificat
- Page 195 and 196:
Exhibit H.1.2 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 197 and 198:
Exhibit H.1.4 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 199 and 200:
Appendix H.2: Model Group 2: Midwes
- Page 201 and 202:
Table H.2a 2006 Pair Weight GEM Mod
- Page 203 and 204:
Selected Pair-Level Poststratificat
- Page 205 and 206:
Exhibit H.2.2 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 207 and 208:
Exhibit H.2.4 Covariates for 2006 N
- Page 209 and 210:
Appendix I: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 211 and 212:
Table I.1 2006 NSDUH Person Pair-Le
- Page 213 and 214:
Appendix J: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 215 and 216:
J-3 Table J.1 Domain 2006 NSDUH Sel
- Page 217 and 218:
J-5 Table J.2 2006 NSDUH Respondent
- Page 219 and 220:
J-7 Table J.3 Domain 2006 NSDUH Res
- Page 221 and 222:
Table J.3 2006 NSDUH Respondent Pai
- Page 223 and 224:
Appendix K: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 225 and 226:
Table K.1 Domain 2006 NSDUH Respond
- Page 227 and 228:
Appendix L: Evaluation of Calibrati
- Page 229 and 230:
L-3 Table L.1 2006 NSDUH Selected P
- Page 231 and 232:
Table L.1 2006 NSDUH Selected Pair-
- Page 233 and 234:
L-7 Table L.2 2006 NSDUH Respondent
- Page 235 and 236:
L-9 Table L.3 2006 NSDUH Respondent
- Page 237 and 238:
Appendix M: Hot-Deck Method of Impu
- Page 239 and 240:
Appendix M: Hot-Deck Method of Impu
- Page 241 and 242:
2 3 2 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1
- Page 243 and 244:
M.5 Unweighted Random Nearest Neigh
- Page 245 and 246:
Appendix N: Univariate and Multivar
- Page 247 and 248:
Appendix N: Univariate and Multivar
- Page 249 and 250:
conditional likelihoods, which then
- Page 251 and 252:
as regression, that quantify the re
- Page 253 and 254:
Appendix O: Rules for Determining P
- Page 255 and 256:
Appendix O: Rules for Determining P
- Page 257 and 258:
Table O.1 Rules for Determining Mat
- Page 259 and 260:
O.2 Rules for Identifying Pair Rela
- Page 261 and 262:
O-9 Table O.2 Priority Condition Ru
- Page 263 and 264:
O-11 Table O.2 Priority Condition 3
- Page 265 and 266:
O-13 Table O.2 Priority Condition 5
- Page 267 and 268:
O-15 Table O.2 Priority Condition 5
- Page 269 and 270:
Appendix P: Priority Conditions for
- Page 271 and 272:
Appendix P: Priority Conditions for
- Page 273 and 274:
Table P.1 Priority Conditions Used
- Page 275 and 276:
Table P.1 Priority Conditions Used
- Page 277 and 278:
P.2. Age Variables Table P.2 illust
- Page 279 and 280:
P-11 Table P.2 Priority Condition,
- Page 281 and 282:
P-13 Table P.2 Priority Condition,
- Page 283 and 284:
P-15 Table P.2 Priority Condition,
- Page 285 and 286:
Table P.2 Priority Condition, Frequ
- Page 287 and 288:
Appendix Q: Pair Relationship, Mult
- Page 289 and 290:
Appendix Q: Pair Relationship, Mult
- Page 291 and 292:
Q.2 Pair Relationship Variables Tab
- Page 293 and 294:
Table Q.1 Model Group 6 (21-25, 21-
- Page 295 and 296:
Q.3 Multiplicities Table Q.2 Pair D
- Page 297 and 298:
Q.4 Household-Level Person Counts T
- Page 299 and 300:
Table Q.3 Pair Domain Sibling (12-1
- Page 301 and 302:
Table Q.4 Pair Domain Parent- Child
- Page 303 and 304:
Table Q.4 Pair Domain Sibling (12-1
- Page 305 and 306:
Appendix R: Conditions Used for Rec
- Page 307 and 308:
Appendix R: Conditions Used for Rec
- Page 309 and 310:
1. If the count of children in the
- Page 311 and 312:
Appendix S: Conditions Used for Rec
- Page 313 and 314:
Appendix S: Conditions Used for Rec
- Page 315 and 316:
included in each other's rosters, b
- Page 317 and 318:
oarder. 37 Selecting either the zer
- Page 319 and 320:
the relevant age range in the house
- Page 321 and 322:
• No situations where both pair m
- Page 323 and 324:
• Neither pair member had bad age
- Page 325 and 326:
the two counts (one count might be
- Page 327 and 328:
pair member, and the pair member's
- Page 329 and 330:
• One pair member was younger tha
- Page 331 and 332:
− The number of roster members be
- Page 333 and 334:
• The pair member with the maximu
- Page 335 and 336:
5. The pair members might both have
- Page 337 and 338:
• The pair relationship was not o