Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Held: The state was acting beyond its authority; accordingly, the new support order was<br />
vacated.<br />
The nonexistence of a support order is a prerequisite to an action under Neb. Rev.<br />
Stat. § 43-512.03.<br />
A court has subject matter jurisdiction over an action brought pursuant to Neb. Rev.<br />
Stat. § 43-512.03 only when there is no existing child support order.<br />
If there is an existing child support order, the State is not authorized to file a petition<br />
for payment of support pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-512.03.<br />
[T]he dissolution decree and the modification orders address the issue of child<br />
support. Even if it was the case that the orders provided that no support is due<br />
from either parent, that does not change the fact that there is an existing<br />
support order.<br />
Note: Section 43-512.01 may allow a CSE attorney to intervene to modify the existing child<br />
support order, but this necessarily involves a change in legal custody of the minor child, which<br />
we are expressly prohibited from becoming involved with, and which requires the court to make<br />
a “best interests” determination before placing physical/legal custody of the child with a parent.<br />
This appears to be a “catch 22” for CSE attorneys.<br />
<strong>Nebraska</strong> v. Garcia, 238 Neb. 455, 471 N.W.2d 388 (1991)<br />
We agree with the <strong>Nebraska</strong> State Bar Association's advisory opinion that the county<br />
attorney may not represent both the interests of the child and the interests of a<br />
parent when the issue of custody of the child is raised. The county attorney's duties<br />
are clearly set forth in the statutes above. These duties do not include involvement in<br />
the determination of custody of a dependent child.<br />
We do not find any statute in which the Legislature has permitted a judgment for<br />
attorney fees to be entered against the State in an action for child support payments.<br />
… any judgment against the State for these fees violates state sovereignty.<br />
Judgments<br />
(see also Jurisdiction)<br />
25-1301. Judgment, rendition of judgment, entry of judgment, decree, or final order,<br />
defined; records.<br />
(1) A judgment is the final determination of the rights of the parties in an action.<br />
(2) Rendition of a judgment is the act of the court, or a judge thereof, in making and signing a<br />
written notation of the relief granted or denied in an action.<br />
(3) The entry of a judgment, decree, or final order occurs when the clerk of the court places the<br />
file stamp and date upon the judgment, decree, or final order. For purposes of determining the<br />
time for appeal, the date stamped on the judgment, decree, or final order shall be the date of<br />
entry.<br />
…<br />
Source: R.S.1867, Code § 428, p. 465; R.S.1913, § 7994; C.S.1922, § 8935; C.S.1929, § 20-1301;<br />
R.S.1943, § 25-1301; Laws 1961, c. 111, § 1, p. 350; Laws 1999, LB 43, § 3.<br />
25-1902 Final order, defined.<br />
An order affecting a substantial right in an action, when such order in effect determines the<br />
action and prevents a judgment, and an order affecting a substantial right made in a special<br />
proceeding, or upon a summary application in an action after judgment, is a final order which<br />
- 107 -