23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

she had sufficient resources to provide such support; or (iii) the incarceration is a result of a<br />

conviction for a crime in which the child who is the subject of the child support order was<br />

victimized; or<br />

(c) When the amount of the order is considered with all the other undisputed facts in the case, no<br />

variation from the criteria set forth in subdivisions (1)(a) and (b) of section 43-512.12 exists.<br />

(2) The department, a county attorney, or an authorized attorney shall not in any case be<br />

responsible for reviewing or filing an application to modify child support for individuals<br />

incarcerated as described in subdivision (1)(b) of this section.<br />

(3) The proceedings to modify a child support order shall comply with section 42-364, and the<br />

county attorney or authorized attorney shall represent the state in the proceedings.<br />

(4) After a complaint to modify a child support order is filed, any party may choose to be<br />

represented personally by private counsel. Any party who retains private counsel shall so notify<br />

the county attorney or authorized attorney in writing.<br />

Source: Laws 2010, LB712, § 26<br />

Practice Note: §42-358 (3) indicates that where the child support payment history shows that<br />

the obligated parent is in arrears, a prima facie case of contempt is made. Arguendo that<br />

should be all that is needed to shift the burden to the incarcerated parent to disprove that he or<br />

she was acting willfully or neglectfully with regard to their child support obligation at the time<br />

they walked (shackled) into prison. (Hat tip to Tyler Jacobsen in the Lancaster Co. Attorney’s<br />

office) See the Incarceration section of this outline for an update on changing case law in this<br />

area.<br />

§43-512.16 Title IV-D child support order; review of health care coverage provisions.<br />

The county attorney or authorized attorney shall review the health care coverage provisions<br />

contained in any child support order which is subject to review under section 43-512.12 and shall<br />

include in any application for modification a request that the court order health care coverage or<br />

cash medical support as provided in subsection (2) of section 42-369.<br />

Source: Laws 1991, LB 715, § 17; Laws 2009, LB288, § 12. Operative Date: September 30, 2009<br />

§43-512.18. Title IV-D child support order; communication technology; use authorized. A<br />

court may use any available technology that would allow the parties to communicate with each<br />

other to conduct a hearing or any proceeding required pursuant to sections 43-512.12 to 43-<br />

512.17. Source: Laws 1991, LB 715, § 19.<br />

REV. OCTOBER 28, 2008 NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT<br />

MANUAL LETTER # 83-2008 HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 466 NAC 8-000<br />

<strong>Nebraska</strong> Administrative Code/<strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> ><br />

http://www.sos.ne.gov/rules-and-regs/regsearch/Rules/Health_and_Human_Services_System/Title-466/Chapter-08.pdf<br />

Note: this is pending modification to bring it in alignment with state law. As of August 2011 this has<br />

not occurred.<br />

8-002 Criteria for a Review:<br />

All <strong>Nebraska</strong> IV-D court orders or foreign orders registered under UIFSA or RURESA in <strong>Nebraska</strong><br />

are eligible for a review for possible modification of the child support amount and inclusion of health<br />

insurance if the following criteria are met:<br />

1. The order is for current support;<br />

2. The order is an active <strong>Nebraska</strong> order;<br />

3. The order is not a tribal order;<br />

4. The order is not an order registered for income withholding only;<br />

5. At least one party resides in <strong>Nebraska</strong>;<br />

6. <strong>Nebraska</strong> maintains continuing exclusive jurisdiction under UIFSA or is the proper state to<br />

acquire continuing exclusive jurisdiction under UIFSA for the support order;<br />

7. The non-custodial party is not institutionalized or incarcerated;<br />

- 125 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!