Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Held: State failed to meet its burden of proof to show parent had earning capacity of minimum<br />
wage income.<br />
[E]arning capacity should be used only if there is evidence that the parent can<br />
realize that capacity through reasonable efforts.<br />
The party seeking the modification has the burden to produce sufficient proof that a<br />
material change of circumstances has occurred that warrants a modification.<br />
The parties ask us to decide whether the material change of circumstances must<br />
exist at the time of filing of the complaint to modify or at the time of the modification<br />
trial. We hold that the change in circumstances must exist at the time of the<br />
modification trial for two reasons. First, because the court’s decision to modify child<br />
support must be based upon the evidence presented in support of the complaint to<br />
modify. Second, because the change in circumstances cannot be temporary.<br />
it would be improper for the court to focus on anything but the most recent<br />
circumstances ascertainable from the evidence.<br />
…such change of circumstances should exist at the time of trial and not merely at<br />
the time of the complaint to modify.<br />
Lee’s decrease in income since the initial complaint to modify was not due to her<br />
fault or voluntary choice. On the contrary, Lee has remained unemployed despite<br />
numerous efforts on her part to find employment.<br />
Although Lee’s employment …lasted for more than 3 months, given that it had<br />
effectively terminated, it could not be reasonably expected to last for an additional 6<br />
months. Thus, the State’s evidence failed to trigger the rebuttable presumption of a<br />
change of circumstances under § 4-217.<br />
See dissent:<br />
The <strong>Nebraska</strong> Supreme Court has held that a material change in<br />
circumstances is a concept which eludes precise, concrete definition. See<br />
Dobbins v. Dobbins, 226 Neb. 465, 411 N.W.2d 644 (1987).<br />
Cooper v. Cooper, 8 Neb. App. 532, 598 N.W.2d 474 (1999)<br />
the trial court did not abuse its discretion when considering the earning capacity of a<br />
mother, who chose to work only part time in order to spend more time with her<br />
children, rather than her actual income when no specific evidence showed an<br />
inability to spend adequate time with the children while she was working 40 hours<br />
per week.<br />
Dworak v. Fugit, 1 Neb. App. 332, 495 N.W.2d 47 (1992)<br />
Holding: Earning capacity, and not mere income, is what a court should focus on<br />
The amount of child support awarded is a function of the status, character, and<br />
situation of the parties…. The primary consideration in determining the level of child<br />
support payments is the best interests of the child.<br />
Henke v. Guerrero, 13 Neb. App. 337, 692 N.W.2d 762 (2005)<br />
<strong>Child</strong> support may be based on a parent’s earning capacity when a parent voluntarily<br />
leaves employment and a reduction in that parent’s support obligation would<br />
seriously impair the needs of the children.<br />
Earning capacity may be used as a basis for an initial determination of child support<br />
under the <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines where evidence is presented that the<br />
parent is capable of realizing such capacity through reasonable effort.<br />
- 62 -