23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Even though the inmate’s circumstances have not changed from his last action to<br />

modify his support obligation, the change of law constitutes a material change of<br />

circumstances.<br />

Rouse v. Rouse, 18 Neb. App. 128, 775 N.W.2d 445 (2009)<br />

Facts: Decided the same day as Hopkins v. Stauffer. The prisoner was sentenced to 38<br />

years incarceration. He was behind in his support payments by over $3,000 at the time of his<br />

incarceration. The District court denied him a downward modification due, in part, to the fact he<br />

owed past due child support at the time he was first incarcerated.<br />

Held: Reversed and remanded. Presentence incarceration must be considered by the trial<br />

court when evaluating any allegation of a lack of “clean hands” by the prisoner.<br />

[T]he change of law making incarceration an involuntary reduction in income under<br />

certain conditions rather than a voluntary reduction constituted a material change of<br />

circumstances.<br />

A person continuously jailed while awaiting trial faces the same reduction in income<br />

as a person continuously incarcerated after sentencing, and the statute specifically<br />

references incarceration in jails in addition to incarceration in federal or state<br />

correctional facilities.<br />

Because there is no documented record of Rouse’s willfully failing or neglecting to<br />

provide proper support when he had sufficient resources to provide such support, we<br />

reverse, and remand for further proceedings.<br />

Still good law:<br />

Smith v. Smith, 12 Neb. App. 597, 681 N.W.2d 57 (2004)<br />

When obligated parent was incarcerated, but not yet sentenced, child support<br />

maybe based upon his regular rate of income pre-incarceration.<br />

Distinguished from State v. Porter, below. In Smith, “There was no evidence from<br />

which the court could determine whether James would be sentenced to a term of<br />

incarceration.“ …”this case presents a factual scenario more akin to where an<br />

individual is not incarcerated at the time of the initial child support award.”<br />

State v. Porter, 259 Neb. 366, 610 N.W.2d 23 (2000)<br />

When earning capacity is used as a basis for an initial determination of child support<br />

under the <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines, there must be some evidence that<br />

the parent is capable of realizing such capacity through reasonable effort. When an<br />

individual is incarcerated at the time initial child support is determined, the<br />

individual’s preincarceration earnings cannot be considered.<br />

Income “from all Sources…”<br />

Disposable income, defined.<br />

Disposable income shall mean that part of the income of any individual remaining after the<br />

deduction from such income of any amounts required by law to be withheld, excepting the<br />

amounts required to be deducted and withheld pursuant to the Income Withholding for <strong>Child</strong><br />

<strong>Support</strong> Act or those provisions of law allowing garnishment, attachment, or execution.<br />

Source: Laws 1985, Second Spec. Sess., LB 7, § 27.<br />

- 92 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!