Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Even though the inmate’s circumstances have not changed from his last action to<br />
modify his support obligation, the change of law constitutes a material change of<br />
circumstances.<br />
Rouse v. Rouse, 18 Neb. App. 128, 775 N.W.2d 445 (2009)<br />
Facts: Decided the same day as Hopkins v. Stauffer. The prisoner was sentenced to 38<br />
years incarceration. He was behind in his support payments by over $3,000 at the time of his<br />
incarceration. The District court denied him a downward modification due, in part, to the fact he<br />
owed past due child support at the time he was first incarcerated.<br />
Held: Reversed and remanded. Presentence incarceration must be considered by the trial<br />
court when evaluating any allegation of a lack of “clean hands” by the prisoner.<br />
[T]he change of law making incarceration an involuntary reduction in income under<br />
certain conditions rather than a voluntary reduction constituted a material change of<br />
circumstances.<br />
A person continuously jailed while awaiting trial faces the same reduction in income<br />
as a person continuously incarcerated after sentencing, and the statute specifically<br />
references incarceration in jails in addition to incarceration in federal or state<br />
correctional facilities.<br />
Because there is no documented record of Rouse’s willfully failing or neglecting to<br />
provide proper support when he had sufficient resources to provide such support, we<br />
reverse, and remand for further proceedings.<br />
Still good law:<br />
Smith v. Smith, 12 Neb. App. 597, 681 N.W.2d 57 (2004)<br />
When obligated parent was incarcerated, but not yet sentenced, child support<br />
maybe based upon his regular rate of income pre-incarceration.<br />
Distinguished from State v. Porter, below. In Smith, “There was no evidence from<br />
which the court could determine whether James would be sentenced to a term of<br />
incarceration.“ …”this case presents a factual scenario more akin to where an<br />
individual is not incarcerated at the time of the initial child support award.”<br />
State v. Porter, 259 Neb. 366, 610 N.W.2d 23 (2000)<br />
When earning capacity is used as a basis for an initial determination of child support<br />
under the <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines, there must be some evidence that<br />
the parent is capable of realizing such capacity through reasonable effort. When an<br />
individual is incarcerated at the time initial child support is determined, the<br />
individual’s preincarceration earnings cannot be considered.<br />
Income “from all Sources…”<br />
Disposable income, defined.<br />
Disposable income shall mean that part of the income of any individual remaining after the<br />
deduction from such income of any amounts required by law to be withheld, excepting the<br />
amounts required to be deducted and withheld pursuant to the Income Withholding for <strong>Child</strong><br />
<strong>Support</strong> Act or those provisions of law allowing garnishment, attachment, or execution.<br />
Source: Laws 1985, Second Spec. Sess., LB 7, § 27.<br />
- 92 -