Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
[W]e construe the <strong>Nebraska</strong> Juvenile Code liberally to accomplish its purpose of<br />
serving the best interests of the juveniles who fall within it. See In re Interest of<br />
Gabriela H., 280 Neb. 284, 785 N.W.2d 843 (2010).<br />
J & H Swine v. Hartington Concrete*, 12 Neb. App. 885, 687 N.W.2d 9 (2004)<br />
Rule: Timing is everything. This case, if anything, may teach the necessity for patience.<br />
For an appellate court to acquire jurisdiction of an appeal, there must be a final<br />
order entered by the court from which the appeal is taken; conversely, an appellate<br />
court is without jurisdiction to entertain appeals from nonfinal orders.<br />
A notice of appeal filed before the trial court announced a “decision or final order”<br />
within the meaning of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1912(2) (Cum. Supp. 2002) in final<br />
determination of an issue of costs cannot relate forward.<br />
Lamb v. Lamb, 14 Neb. App. 337, 707 N.W.2d 423 (2005)<br />
The <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) does not confer subject<br />
matter jurisdiction upon a <strong>Nebraska</strong> court to modify a child support order issued by<br />
another state.<br />
This case also includes a good discussion of the differences between UIFSA and the UCCJA<br />
<strong>Nebraska</strong> v. Storz, 235 Neb. 368, 455 N.W.2d 182 (1990)<br />
<strong>Child</strong> conceived after the divorce decree was signed but before the parents’ divorce<br />
decree was final is a child of the marriage, and only the court which heard the<br />
divorce has the jurisdiction to address issues relating to the support of the child.<br />
Rozsnyai v. Svacek, 272 Neb. 567, 723 N.W.2d 329 (2006)<br />
Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-351 (Reissue 2004), full and complete general<br />
jurisdiction over the entire marital relationship and all related matters is vested in the<br />
county or district court in which a petition for dissolution of marriage is properly filed.<br />
Neb. Rev. Stat. §42-349 (Reissue 2004) provides that in order to maintain an action<br />
for divorce in <strong>Nebraska</strong>, one of the parties must have had “actual residence in this<br />
state with a bona fide intention of making this state his or her permanent home for at<br />
least one year prior to the filing of the complaint.”<br />
A nonimmigrant alien authorized to reside in this country on a visitor’s visa does so<br />
on a temporary basis and on the condition that he or she is not abandoning his or<br />
her foreign residence. 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(15)(B); 8 C.F.R. §214.2(b) (2006). The<br />
residency restrictions placed on a nonimmigrant alien residing on a visitor’s visa<br />
negates the inference that a nonimmigrant alien intends to reside in <strong>Nebraska</strong> on a<br />
permanent basis merely because he or she has resided in this state for more than 1<br />
year.<br />
There may be instances where a nonimmigrant alien is able to establish an intention<br />
to reside in a state permanently when the alien has offered proof of that intent apart<br />
from his or her presence in that state.<br />
Small v. Small, 229 Neb. 344, 427 N.W.2d 42 (1988)<br />
A district court cannot acquire jurisdiction over dissolution of marriage proceedings<br />
unless one of the parties is a resident of the county in which the court is located at<br />
the time the original petition is filed.<br />
- 112 -