05.07.2014 Views

The Common Ground Network for Life and Choice Manual

The Common Ground Network for Life and Choice Manual

The Common Ground Network for Life and Choice Manual

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

people carry too much work <strong>for</strong> too long of a time. Rotating jobs is typically a method used.<br />

This is especially true <strong>for</strong> organizing events like dialogues <strong>and</strong> workshops. Each ef<strong>for</strong>t should be<br />

documented in a way that makes it easy <strong>for</strong> a different person/s to do the job the next time.<br />

Group Decision Making<br />

Dialogue is not a decision-making process. Groups need to have an<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing about how they will arrive at decisions, when they want <strong>and</strong> need to do<br />

that. <strong>The</strong>re are various approaches <strong>for</strong> this ranging from using Robert’s Rules of Order<br />

<strong>and</strong> majority vote, to requiring full consensus. We recommend some <strong>for</strong>m of consensus<br />

or modified consensus approach given the need <strong>for</strong> a common ground group to speak<br />

with one voice. <strong>The</strong> facilitation manual published by the Mennonite Conciliation Service<br />

has good designs <strong>for</strong> a number of different decision-making approaches of this type.<br />

Chapter Nine has contact in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> obtaining this resource. NAFCM is also a<br />

place to get guidance.<br />

It is important that whatever the decision-making method, participants remain<br />

committed to their core ground rules about respect, language, <strong>and</strong> seeking underst<strong>and</strong>ing.<br />

Experience has shown that it is easy to become careless about these when the group goes<br />

into a decision-making or planning mode.<br />

Adding Members<br />

Having people interested in joining an existing group is a good problem. To change the<br />

dynamics of the abortion conflict, the number of people who experience dialogue <strong>and</strong> search <strong>for</strong><br />

common ground has to increase.<br />

However, there is a challenge in incorporating new members. How do they gain skills<br />

<strong>for</strong> dialogue <strong>and</strong> a commitment to the process? How does trust get built, particularly with<br />

longer-time members? <strong>The</strong>re is more than one way to answer these questions. <strong>The</strong> key is to<br />

create some intentional way <strong>for</strong> these things to happen. Approaches we have seen include:<br />

• In a start-up group, reaching a decision after the first few meetings to close off any new<br />

members so that the group can come together <strong>and</strong> build trust <strong>and</strong> a common purpose.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!