13.07.2014 Views

Assessing the economic impacts of nature based tourism in Scotland

Assessing the economic impacts of nature based tourism in Scotland

Assessing the economic impacts of nature based tourism in Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5 WILDLIFE WATCHING<br />

5.1 Wildlife <strong>tourism</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong><br />

The report commissioned <strong>in</strong> 2009 by <strong>the</strong> Scottish Government on <strong>the</strong> Economic Impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> Wildlife Tourism <strong>in</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> from <strong>the</strong> International Centre for Tourism and<br />

Hospitality Research at Bournemouth University was received just as we were<br />

complet<strong>in</strong>g this report and we were not able to assess its f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> detail. The o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

reports assessed below relate to specific bird species and to wildlife <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Highlands<br />

and Islands.<br />

The Bournemouth University study, through household survey, attempted to identify<br />

those visitors for whom view<strong>in</strong>g wildlife was <strong>the</strong> prime purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir trip. In our view,<br />

<strong>the</strong> methodology gave an upward bias to this total, although <strong>the</strong> survey helped us <strong>in</strong><br />

determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relative importance <strong>of</strong> wildlife <strong>in</strong> people’s decisions to visit <strong>Scotland</strong> for<br />

our overall analysis <strong>in</strong> Section 13.5 below.<br />

The study’s impact methodology was unusual <strong>in</strong> how additionality and displacement<br />

were applied; but, although we believe that <strong>the</strong> adjustments to reduce <strong>the</strong> benefits from<br />

gross expenditure by wildlife visitors to derive net impact were severe, <strong>the</strong> net impact<br />

calculated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report from visitors to <strong>Scotland</strong> whose prime purpose was to see<br />

wildlife – £65 million – was similar to <strong>the</strong> estimate we derive later <strong>in</strong> this Section from<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r data.<br />

The figures given <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report for <strong>the</strong> “Highlands and Islands” are not for <strong>the</strong> HIE area,<br />

and exclude Moray, Argyll and Bute and <strong>the</strong> Clyde islands.<br />

5.2 Bird species<br />

Watched like never before… <strong>the</strong> local <strong>economic</strong> benefits <strong>of</strong> spectacular bird species<br />

(Dickie et al, 2006).<br />

Contractor: Ian Dickie, Julian Hughes and Aniol Esteban (RSPB)<br />

Client: RSPB<br />

Publication: 2006<br />

Study Objectives:<br />

• To summarise <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g reports on <strong>the</strong> <strong>economic</strong> benefits that are generated by<br />

<strong>the</strong> public access<strong>in</strong>g charismatic bird species.<br />

Research method:<br />

The report is a summary <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> UK studies on <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> bird watch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

opportunities across Brita<strong>in</strong> where a specific species has a high pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Economic<br />

activity (i.e. watch<strong>in</strong>g) generally relates to <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g period.<br />

• White Tailed Sea Eagle - <strong>based</strong> on <strong>in</strong>terviews <strong>of</strong> 400 parties – 1,381 people;<br />

• Osprey - <strong>based</strong> on enhanced estimates from visitor levels and <strong>the</strong>n projected onto<br />

<strong>the</strong> conclusions <strong>of</strong> a 1996 study;<br />

• Red Kites - methodology not known;<br />

• Peregr<strong>in</strong>e - rough numbers <strong>of</strong> visitors and no <strong>economic</strong> analysis;<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!