30.08.2014 Views

biologia - Studia

biologia - Studia

biologia - Studia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

V. MUNTEAN, C.-G. MAIER, R. CARPA, C. MUREŞAN, A. C. FARKAS<br />

100000<br />

10000<br />

Total coliforms/l<br />

1000<br />

100<br />

10<br />

1<br />

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5<br />

Sampling site<br />

Spring Summer Autumn Winter<br />

Fig. 1. The number of total coliforms (logarithmic expression).<br />

One can notice that: strain 1 (S1) gave positive results only for indole<br />

production and methyl red test; strain 2 (S2) was positive for methyl red test, citrate<br />

utilization and urea hydrolysis; strain 3 (S3) was positive for Voges-Proskauer test,<br />

citrate and malonate utilization, and for urea hydrolysis; strain 4 (S4) was positive for<br />

six tests and negative only for the Voges-Proskauer test. According to these results, we<br />

assume that the four analysed strains belong to the following bacterial genera:<br />

Escherichia (S1), Klebsiella (S2), Enterobacter (S3) and Citrobacter (S4).<br />

We notice the efficiency of the water treatment plant in Gilău. The applied<br />

treatment methods assure the complete elimination of coliforms in water, as the<br />

regular analyses at the treatment plant demonstrate. But we also notice the high<br />

negative potential of the permanently increasing number of habitations built along<br />

the river upstream the water treatment plant. The attention must be watchful and<br />

permanent, taking into account that the coliforms are discharged daily in numbers<br />

of billions by each human or animal being, in their faeces. And what is more<br />

important, the presence of coliforms indicates the possible presence in water of the<br />

pathogenic enteric bacteria.<br />

134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!