30.08.2014 Views

biologia - Studia

biologia - Studia

biologia - Studia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A. KONTER<br />

average clutch size more in early than in later clutches and potential parasitism was<br />

not detected in any late clutch. It seems also clear that early clutches were more<br />

prone to the reception of foreign eggs simply because they existed early when settlement<br />

pressure built up. Brood parasitism was proved in 69% of the exceptionally large<br />

clutches laid in 2005 and 2006 and it could not be excluded in the remaining 31%.<br />

Parasitic egg laying was thus a major component in extraordinary large clutches<br />

which in turn contributed to high average clutch sizes. This is in agreement with<br />

Vlug (1983) who found the modal clutch of Great Crested Grebes in the Netherlands to<br />

hold four eggs and clutches of seven and more eggs are laid most times by two<br />

females. Blinov et al. (1981) and Goc (1986) support this thesis. Other arguments<br />

in favour of the limitation in normal clutch size are the maximum numbers of<br />

fledglings of 3 to 4 in the species and the findings of Lyon and Everding (1996)<br />

predicting that a non-parasitized full clutch of Eared Grebes P. nigricollis holds 3<br />

or 4 eggs and never exceeds 4 eggs while, similarly to Great Crested Grebes, larger<br />

clutches occur. We conclude that, at least for experienced Great Crested Grebes, a<br />

not parasitized clutch should range between 3 and 5 eggs.<br />

Lyon and Everding (1996) found nest density to influence brood parasitism<br />

in the Eared Grebe; high levels of aggression related to dense nesting may provide<br />

more opportunities for a parasitic female to sneak onto a momentarily undefended<br />

nest. We then could expect more parasitic eggs in denser nesting parts of a colony<br />

and therefore generally increasing clutch sizes with increased clumping. This was<br />

indeed the case in the colony investigated here in 2006 and for all years combined,<br />

but the pattern for the 4 years taken separately was not uniform. Nesting density<br />

might therefore only be one out of several factors affecting brood parasitism and<br />

may not play a predominant role. Considering only extraordinary large clutches<br />

(that had a good chance of having been parasitized), we found no homogenous<br />

attributes other than generally early platform and clutch initiation (prior to the<br />

mean dates for the colony). It appeared however that adverse weather conditions<br />

leading to the destruction of a more or less important part of the platforms might<br />

push brood parasitism at least momentarily to higher levels. At Lake Braband,<br />

Henriksen (1996) found that 30% of the females lost their clutch before completion<br />

through nest destruction and he expected platform loss to be responsible for a more<br />

or less important part of parasitic egg laying.<br />

Vlug (1998) argued that fierce nest defence by colonial grebes is possibly<br />

an attempt to prevent brood parasitism on their nests. Behavioural tactics so far<br />

evolved to avoid parasitism may then still be insufficient and would only limit the<br />

degree of conspecific brood parasitism in the species.<br />

Analyzing small clutches more in detail, we observed that their platform<br />

initiation dates were mostly late, their waiting times until clutch initiation generally<br />

above average (80%) and their start of egg laying occurred either on the average date<br />

for the colony as a whole (27%) or later (53%). This pattern could of course be<br />

explained by the differences in migratory decisions and in body conditions of the<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!