30.08.2014 Views

biologia - Studia

biologia - Studia

biologia - Studia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE IN STATE TRANSITIONS<br />

1-q P x 10 -2<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

M V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6<br />

Fig. 3. Evolution of excitation pressure in photosystems’ state 1 and 2.<br />

In conditions which reduce the light energy consuption in photochemistry<br />

and thermic dissipation, the chlorophyll fluorescence increases, while an increase in<br />

the excitation energy usage leads to fluorescence quenching (Kornyeyev et al., 2002).<br />

The non-radiative dissipation of excitation energy in the photosystems’ antenna<br />

decreases F 0 and F m proportionally, and dissipation from reaction centers reduces the<br />

F m only (Gilmore and Yamamoto, 1991). The fluorescence quenching associated to<br />

photoinhibition is not correlated directly to degradation of PS II reaction centers<br />

(Briantais et al., 1988).<br />

Quenching coeficients<br />

1.1<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

qP<br />

qN<br />

M V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6<br />

Fig. 4. Evolution of the photochemical (q P ) and non-photochemical (q N )<br />

coefficients in photosystems’ state 1 and 2.<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!