biologia - Studia
biologia - Studia
biologia - Studia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE IN STATE TRANSITIONS<br />
1-q P x 10 -2<br />
10<br />
9<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
M V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6<br />
Fig. 3. Evolution of excitation pressure in photosystems’ state 1 and 2.<br />
In conditions which reduce the light energy consuption in photochemistry<br />
and thermic dissipation, the chlorophyll fluorescence increases, while an increase in<br />
the excitation energy usage leads to fluorescence quenching (Kornyeyev et al., 2002).<br />
The non-radiative dissipation of excitation energy in the photosystems’ antenna<br />
decreases F 0 and F m proportionally, and dissipation from reaction centers reduces the<br />
F m only (Gilmore and Yamamoto, 1991). The fluorescence quenching associated to<br />
photoinhibition is not correlated directly to degradation of PS II reaction centers<br />
(Briantais et al., 1988).<br />
Quenching coeficients<br />
1.1<br />
1<br />
0.9<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
qP<br />
qN<br />
M V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6<br />
Fig. 4. Evolution of the photochemical (q P ) and non-photochemical (q N )<br />
coefficients in photosystems’ state 1 and 2.<br />
87