Samriddhi
Samriddhi
Samriddhi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Samriddhi</strong> Project Document<br />
• strengthen efforts of community organisations to identify their development priorities,<br />
arrange joint actions, mobilise resources and services, defend their interests and rights,<br />
and participate in local decision-making processes<br />
In general, both the projects were seen as well on track regarding targets and performance,<br />
while interventions with less significant results were linked to weak institutional capacities and<br />
framework conditions. The key challenge today is to ensure the sustainability of the results. A<br />
better understanding is needed on how key functions performed by the projects can be<br />
transferred to the stakeholders.<br />
The specific achievements of the projects, but also challenges for their consolidation in a next<br />
phase are presented below.<br />
Social organisation<br />
The projects supported around 1500 cluster platforms which are formed by nearly 5000 CBOs.<br />
97% of the cluster platforms could develop their annual plans of operations (APO) reflecting<br />
priority issues and opportunities of the communities, and could identify appropriate actions in<br />
order to address the issues using available opportunities. Almost all the cluster platforms could<br />
establish functional linkages with the Union Parishad (UP), as well as other governmental and<br />
non-governmental organisations for the acquisition of appropriate services and goods for their<br />
members, specifically the extreme poor. As a result, more than 40,000 extreme poor<br />
households could get access to safety-net opportunities from UPs and public organisations.<br />
Furthermore, members of the cluster platforms are, due to their prominent place in the<br />
community, often selected to become members of divers committees of the UP: standing<br />
committees like education and agriculture, project implementation committees, project<br />
supervision committees, etc. The UPs often request the participation of cluster platform and<br />
SPA representatives in the Union Development Coordination Meetings.<br />
Key lessons learned:<br />
• CBOs are reluctant to include more members because they are rather closed groups of<br />
people with common savings and common interests. On the other hand, cluster<br />
platforms are more open to include members from the whole community. Furthermore,<br />
cluster platforms are well positioned to take the lead of promoting development priorities<br />
of the community and connect to external sources of support/resources, including local<br />
government bodies.<br />
• Networks of cluster platforms have shown to be good for ad-hoc and need based<br />
initiatives to tackle common issues like DRR but have not shown an interest to evolve as<br />
formalised organisations. It must be reminded that the concept of cluster platform<br />
networks was initially thought as a driver for a self-propelling process of replication of the<br />
cluster platform model.<br />
For the consolidation phase, the project’s focus should be on cluster platforms considering the<br />
wider impact on and inclusiveness of the whole community. Networks of cluster platforms will<br />
not be considered as a secondary level of organisation. The challenge will be to ensure that<br />
cluster platforms are in a position to better cover the interests of extreme poor and<br />
disadvantaged groups.<br />
Intercooperation Bangladesh Page 7