07.09.2014 Views

Samriddhi

Samriddhi

Samriddhi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Samriddhi</strong> Project Document Phase 1<br />

Annexes<br />

b. Feasibility of changes induced by project interventions<br />

c. Quantification of offers to value chain actors (preliminary budget)<br />

Following table contains the road map of the value chains analyses:<br />

Major steps<br />

Preliminary Timing<br />

Review existing inception reports as well as<br />

secondary information<br />

June 2010<br />

Design and finalise assessment tools June-July 2010<br />

Orientation of staff members about the<br />

assessment<br />

July 2010<br />

Conduct assessment July-August 2010<br />

Analyse assessment findings and prepare<br />

analysis reports<br />

September 2010<br />

Design strategies and intervention September 2010<br />

Develop APO October 2010<br />

d. Description of VC ranking<br />

The objectives of this Value Chain (VC) ranking exercise were to –<br />

- assess the performance of each value chain with an Extreme Poor (EP) focus,<br />

i.e. how much each VC contributes to the livelihoods of extreme poor<br />

- set the next course of action in developing value chains<br />

Methodology<br />

For the VC ranking exercise one tool was developed by a team at PSMU. A field test<br />

with one value chain was carried out and the results used to make adjustments. The tool<br />

was shared with all regional colleagues and, through a workshop all feedback and<br />

comments were collected and the tool further adjusted.<br />

The tool consists of two parts, one being the VC Performance Sheet and the other the<br />

Ranking sheet.<br />

Performance sheet<br />

This consists of 12 criteria which include a number of indicators through which<br />

performance of each VC was evaluated. Specific indicators were rated with the<br />

achievements or progress obtained in 2007, 2008 and 2009. For qualitative information,<br />

ratings were calculated on a scale of 1 to 5 (where 1 has the lowest significance and 5 is<br />

the highest significance).<br />

Intercooperation Bangladesh<br />

Page LXXV

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!