Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
i<br />
$200,000<br />
I<br />
;<br />
HOLLYWOOD<br />
I independent<br />
I<br />
I<br />
The<br />
I<br />
I by<br />
!<br />
production<br />
I<br />
King<br />
—<br />
—<br />
rV Acting Pact Ratified<br />
5y Huge SAG Majority<br />
HOLLYWOOD—A 96 per cent majority<br />
vote by members of the Screen Actors<br />
Guild approved a new collective bargaining<br />
agreement covering actors in television<br />
films. Ballots ratifying the pact numbered<br />
5,362. with 207 opposing ratification. Some<br />
14.000 ballots were mailed to SAG members.<br />
The overwhelming majority in favor of<br />
the contract was registered despite the<br />
opposition of the guild's New York branch<br />
council, which sent a special letter to all<br />
Gotham members of the guild declaring<br />
the contract was "unsatisfactory when<br />
taken in its entirety."<br />
The guild's national board of directors<br />
and negotiating committee had unan<strong>im</strong>ously<br />
recommended that the contracts<br />
be approved.<br />
Fox Denied Right to Use<br />
King of Kingdom' Title<br />
NE'W YORK — Twentieth Century-Fox<br />
was denied the right to use the title "King of<br />
the Kingdom" Tuesday (23) at a meeting<br />
of the Arbitration Committee of the Title<br />
Registration Bureau of the Motion Picture<br />
Assn of America. It had been registered<br />
about two months ago in connection with<br />
a Roman Catholic film, "The 15 Mysteries<br />
of the Rosary." and protested by Samuel<br />
Bronston, producer, who argued that he<br />
had previously registered the title.<br />
Bronston is working on "King of Kings"<br />
for MOM release. His right to that title<br />
has been questioned by Cinema Corp. of<br />
America, distributor of the original DeMille<br />
film. "King of Kings." He had registered<br />
it and it was said that Cinema had not<br />
done so.<br />
High Asking Price Asked<br />
For 'Lion Pit' Rights<br />
HOLLY'WOOD—One of the highest asking<br />
prices for a literary property has been<br />
;put on the film rights to "The Lion Pit,"<br />
; first novel by Frank Harvey. All Hollywood<br />
studios have been quoted a price of<br />
against 4 per cent of the gross,<br />
and as part of the deal sought, the buyer<br />
must make the picture within three years;<br />
otherwise, a $20,000-a-year penalty is<br />
: levied for a max<strong>im</strong>um of five years, all to<br />
be applied against the gross.<br />
Meanwhile, a payment of $150,000<br />
against a percentage of the profits was<br />
paid by MGM for the purchase of "All<br />
[Fall Down," a new novel by James Leo<br />
Herlihy. The story calls for a cast of<br />
younger stars.<br />
|Next Sinatra Start<br />
— Frank Sinatra's next<br />
production. "X-15. T<strong>im</strong>e of<br />
Departure." is dated to start January 16.<br />
story, revolving around the U. S. Air<br />
Force's outer space program, was acquired<br />
Sinatra from scripter Tony Lazzarino.<br />
'Guadalupe' on Fox Slate<br />
HOLLYWOOD—Film rights to "Miracle<br />
of Guadalupe," James O'Hanlon screenplay,<br />
have been purchased by 20th-Fox<br />
chief Robert Goldstein. Henry<br />
has been assigned to direct. No producer<br />
has been named.<br />
vj ARE, indeed, the observer of the mo-<br />
[^<br />
tion picture scene who has failed<br />
to comment upon the understandable<br />
decision of the directorate of the Motion<br />
Picture Ass'n of America not to finance<br />
196rs telecast of the Awards Event<br />
of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts<br />
and Sciences.<br />
In most instances, the verdict was<br />
termed "regrettable," as it undoubtedly is.<br />
No commentator, however, seems to have<br />
touched upon what might well have been<br />
the principal reason why the magi of distribution<br />
elected to stop picking up the<br />
tab for Oscar's big night—an annual chit<br />
that adds up to more than a half million<br />
dnllars—and that ain't bagels, even when<br />
business is good. Such possible pr<strong>im</strong>e motive<br />
might have found genesis in the inescapable<br />
fact that during recent years<br />
the bestov.-ing of awards on pictures and<br />
those who staiTed in them has not been<br />
productive of the additional boxoffice revenue<br />
that once obtained. There was a t<strong>im</strong>e<br />
when selecting a photoplay as the best of<br />
the year or comparable recognition of<br />
toplining mummers could mean hundreds<br />
of thousands of dollars, via the reissue<br />
route, to distributors and exhibitors.<br />
But the growing tendency toward avalanching<br />
a dominant percentage of the<br />
vearly kudos upon one outstanding, highbudget<br />
photoplay which was of necessity<br />
being shown on a reserved-seats basis<br />
and would continue to be exhibited under<br />
such policy for many months to come<br />
cut materially into the chances of both<br />
distributors and theatre operators to garner<br />
reissue dollars. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer's<br />
mighty "Ben-Hur," which is still going<br />
strong as a hard-ticket attraction, and<br />
the late Michael Todd's "Around the World<br />
in 80 Days" are classical examples. Moreover,<br />
with the pending advent of such<br />
mastodons as Bryna-Universal-Intemational's<br />
"Spartacus," and John Wayne-<br />
United Artists' "The Alamo," there appears<br />
to be little chance that road shows<br />
will cease making a concerted bid lor<br />
Academy honors. No one is to be blamed<br />
for this situation. It stems from an unavoidable<br />
evolutionary process within the<br />
trade.<br />
Be that as it may, Oscar will have to<br />
backslide to playing fiscal footsies with<br />
motors or medicines, bras, detergents or<br />
deodorants, etc., and thereby will be lost<br />
another round in the industry's battle for<br />
continued dignity and prestige.<br />
Probably the economy master-minds<br />
would attribute it to cause and effect, but,<br />
regardless of the reasons, the trend toward<br />
decentralization of production is apparently<br />
spreading to the levels of publicity—much<br />
to the advantage of the freelance flackeries<br />
which are expanding in size and <strong>im</strong>portance<br />
while studio press departments<br />
In most cases remain at the skeleton status<br />
to which they were reduced during the<br />
actors' strike. The drift toward independent<br />
space-snatchers has even reached television.<br />
Screen Gems, which at one t<strong>im</strong>e<br />
maintained a sizeable publicity department,<br />
has farmed out four of its shows. One<br />
will be handled by the silkstocking prais-<br />
?ry of Rogers and Cowan (Handsome<br />
Henry and Winsome Warren need it—you<br />
should live so long) and still another goes<br />
to McFadden and Eddy, etc.<br />
Whether this migration to the unaffiliated<br />
tub-thumpers is good or bad for<br />
the studios, the pictures and stars they<br />
ostensibly publicize is a matter of personal<br />
belief. In this opinion it is not salubrious.<br />
It is doubted that an independent pressagentry<br />
with several accounts to service<br />
can or will do as good a job as a department<br />
or individual with a sole goal to<br />
attain. What's more, there can be little<br />
doubt that the trend is hardly conducive<br />
to bolstering the morale of the l<strong>im</strong>ited<br />
number of men who remain on studio<br />
publicity department payrolls.<br />
Perhaps nothing better illustrates the<br />
above-described situation than the recent<br />
experiences of Marty Weiser, veteran movie<br />
publicist and exploiteer. For many years,<br />
Marty was a salaried employe of Warner<br />
Bros., where he specialized in merchandising<br />
pictures. Then he became associated<br />
with producer-distributor-exhibitor Robert<br />
Lippert in a s<strong>im</strong>ilar capacity. Still later,<br />
he decided to hang out his own shingle as<br />
a freelance publicist, retaining Lippert as<br />
his bellwether account. Came an offer from<br />
Col<strong>im</strong>ibia studio to do a special selling<br />
job on that outfit's current "Strangers<br />
When We Meet," which proffered proposition<br />
was so fiscally flattering that Weiser<br />
could not afford to pass it up. So. he<br />
disposed of his business and for the next<br />
several months devoted his full t<strong>im</strong>e to<br />
"Strangers." The job—and it goes without<br />
saying that he did an outstanding one<br />
completed, he was retained by the Cleary-<br />
Strauss & Irwin flackery to perform a<br />
s<strong>im</strong>ilar chore for an NBC-TV special<br />
starring Tennessee Ernie Ford.<br />
Recently, it became known that Weiser's<br />
always-effective services were again available.<br />
He was virtually deluged with offers.<br />
Out of it all, he decided to return to<br />
C. S. & I. as, what Madison Avenue would<br />
call, an account executive. He has already<br />
assumed the stewardship and responsibility<br />
for three <strong>im</strong>portant assignments, to<br />
wit:<br />
Serving as special coordinator of all promotional<br />
activities in connection with the<br />
hard-ticket engagements in Los Angeles<br />
and San Francisco of "Sunrise at Campobello,"<br />
the Dore Schary production.<br />
Handling publicity for producer William<br />
Claxton, who has returned to the fabrication<br />
of theatrical film fare after a hiatus<br />
bout with television. Claxton's upcoming<br />
picture is "Desire in the Dust," which will<br />
be distributed by 20th Century-Fox and<br />
was made for Associated Producers, Inc.,<br />
the 20th-Fox affiliate <strong>im</strong>presarioed by<br />
Lippert.<br />
Doing some special exploitation work on<br />
all of the forthcoming features under the<br />
aegis of the same Lippert.<br />
, BOXOFFICE August 29, 1960 W-3