29.09.2014 Views

im

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

i<br />

$200,000<br />

I<br />

;<br />

HOLLYWOOD<br />

I independent<br />

I<br />

I<br />

The<br />

I<br />

I by<br />

!<br />

production<br />

I<br />

King<br />

—<br />

—<br />

rV Acting Pact Ratified<br />

5y Huge SAG Majority<br />

HOLLYWOOD—A 96 per cent majority<br />

vote by members of the Screen Actors<br />

Guild approved a new collective bargaining<br />

agreement covering actors in television<br />

films. Ballots ratifying the pact numbered<br />

5,362. with 207 opposing ratification. Some<br />

14.000 ballots were mailed to SAG members.<br />

The overwhelming majority in favor of<br />

the contract was registered despite the<br />

opposition of the guild's New York branch<br />

council, which sent a special letter to all<br />

Gotham members of the guild declaring<br />

the contract was "unsatisfactory when<br />

taken in its entirety."<br />

The guild's national board of directors<br />

and negotiating committee had unan<strong>im</strong>ously<br />

recommended that the contracts<br />

be approved.<br />

Fox Denied Right to Use<br />

King of Kingdom' Title<br />

NE'W YORK — Twentieth Century-Fox<br />

was denied the right to use the title "King of<br />

the Kingdom" Tuesday (23) at a meeting<br />

of the Arbitration Committee of the Title<br />

Registration Bureau of the Motion Picture<br />

Assn of America. It had been registered<br />

about two months ago in connection with<br />

a Roman Catholic film, "The 15 Mysteries<br />

of the Rosary." and protested by Samuel<br />

Bronston, producer, who argued that he<br />

had previously registered the title.<br />

Bronston is working on "King of Kings"<br />

for MOM release. His right to that title<br />

has been questioned by Cinema Corp. of<br />

America, distributor of the original DeMille<br />

film. "King of Kings." He had registered<br />

it and it was said that Cinema had not<br />

done so.<br />

High Asking Price Asked<br />

For 'Lion Pit' Rights<br />

HOLLY'WOOD—One of the highest asking<br />

prices for a literary property has been<br />

;put on the film rights to "The Lion Pit,"<br />

; first novel by Frank Harvey. All Hollywood<br />

studios have been quoted a price of<br />

against 4 per cent of the gross,<br />

and as part of the deal sought, the buyer<br />

must make the picture within three years;<br />

otherwise, a $20,000-a-year penalty is<br />

: levied for a max<strong>im</strong>um of five years, all to<br />

be applied against the gross.<br />

Meanwhile, a payment of $150,000<br />

against a percentage of the profits was<br />

paid by MGM for the purchase of "All<br />

[Fall Down," a new novel by James Leo<br />

Herlihy. The story calls for a cast of<br />

younger stars.<br />

|Next Sinatra Start<br />

— Frank Sinatra's next<br />

production. "X-15. T<strong>im</strong>e of<br />

Departure." is dated to start January 16.<br />

story, revolving around the U. S. Air<br />

Force's outer space program, was acquired<br />

Sinatra from scripter Tony Lazzarino.<br />

'Guadalupe' on Fox Slate<br />

HOLLYWOOD—Film rights to "Miracle<br />

of Guadalupe," James O'Hanlon screenplay,<br />

have been purchased by 20th-Fox<br />

chief Robert Goldstein. Henry<br />

has been assigned to direct. No producer<br />

has been named.<br />

vj ARE, indeed, the observer of the mo-<br />

[^<br />

tion picture scene who has failed<br />

to comment upon the understandable<br />

decision of the directorate of the Motion<br />

Picture Ass'n of America not to finance<br />

196rs telecast of the Awards Event<br />

of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts<br />

and Sciences.<br />

In most instances, the verdict was<br />

termed "regrettable," as it undoubtedly is.<br />

No commentator, however, seems to have<br />

touched upon what might well have been<br />

the principal reason why the magi of distribution<br />

elected to stop picking up the<br />

tab for Oscar's big night—an annual chit<br />

that adds up to more than a half million<br />

dnllars—and that ain't bagels, even when<br />

business is good. Such possible pr<strong>im</strong>e motive<br />

might have found genesis in the inescapable<br />

fact that during recent years<br />

the bestov.-ing of awards on pictures and<br />

those who staiTed in them has not been<br />

productive of the additional boxoffice revenue<br />

that once obtained. There was a t<strong>im</strong>e<br />

when selecting a photoplay as the best of<br />

the year or comparable recognition of<br />

toplining mummers could mean hundreds<br />

of thousands of dollars, via the reissue<br />

route, to distributors and exhibitors.<br />

But the growing tendency toward avalanching<br />

a dominant percentage of the<br />

vearly kudos upon one outstanding, highbudget<br />

photoplay which was of necessity<br />

being shown on a reserved-seats basis<br />

and would continue to be exhibited under<br />

such policy for many months to come<br />

cut materially into the chances of both<br />

distributors and theatre operators to garner<br />

reissue dollars. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer's<br />

mighty "Ben-Hur," which is still going<br />

strong as a hard-ticket attraction, and<br />

the late Michael Todd's "Around the World<br />

in 80 Days" are classical examples. Moreover,<br />

with the pending advent of such<br />

mastodons as Bryna-Universal-Intemational's<br />

"Spartacus," and John Wayne-<br />

United Artists' "The Alamo," there appears<br />

to be little chance that road shows<br />

will cease making a concerted bid lor<br />

Academy honors. No one is to be blamed<br />

for this situation. It stems from an unavoidable<br />

evolutionary process within the<br />

trade.<br />

Be that as it may, Oscar will have to<br />

backslide to playing fiscal footsies with<br />

motors or medicines, bras, detergents or<br />

deodorants, etc., and thereby will be lost<br />

another round in the industry's battle for<br />

continued dignity and prestige.<br />

Probably the economy master-minds<br />

would attribute it to cause and effect, but,<br />

regardless of the reasons, the trend toward<br />

decentralization of production is apparently<br />

spreading to the levels of publicity—much<br />

to the advantage of the freelance flackeries<br />

which are expanding in size and <strong>im</strong>portance<br />

while studio press departments<br />

In most cases remain at the skeleton status<br />

to which they were reduced during the<br />

actors' strike. The drift toward independent<br />

space-snatchers has even reached television.<br />

Screen Gems, which at one t<strong>im</strong>e<br />

maintained a sizeable publicity department,<br />

has farmed out four of its shows. One<br />

will be handled by the silkstocking prais-<br />

?ry of Rogers and Cowan (Handsome<br />

Henry and Winsome Warren need it—you<br />

should live so long) and still another goes<br />

to McFadden and Eddy, etc.<br />

Whether this migration to the unaffiliated<br />

tub-thumpers is good or bad for<br />

the studios, the pictures and stars they<br />

ostensibly publicize is a matter of personal<br />

belief. In this opinion it is not salubrious.<br />

It is doubted that an independent pressagentry<br />

with several accounts to service<br />

can or will do as good a job as a department<br />

or individual with a sole goal to<br />

attain. What's more, there can be little<br />

doubt that the trend is hardly conducive<br />

to bolstering the morale of the l<strong>im</strong>ited<br />

number of men who remain on studio<br />

publicity department payrolls.<br />

Perhaps nothing better illustrates the<br />

above-described situation than the recent<br />

experiences of Marty Weiser, veteran movie<br />

publicist and exploiteer. For many years,<br />

Marty was a salaried employe of Warner<br />

Bros., where he specialized in merchandising<br />

pictures. Then he became associated<br />

with producer-distributor-exhibitor Robert<br />

Lippert in a s<strong>im</strong>ilar capacity. Still later,<br />

he decided to hang out his own shingle as<br />

a freelance publicist, retaining Lippert as<br />

his bellwether account. Came an offer from<br />

Col<strong>im</strong>ibia studio to do a special selling<br />

job on that outfit's current "Strangers<br />

When We Meet," which proffered proposition<br />

was so fiscally flattering that Weiser<br />

could not afford to pass it up. So. he<br />

disposed of his business and for the next<br />

several months devoted his full t<strong>im</strong>e to<br />

"Strangers." The job—and it goes without<br />

saying that he did an outstanding one<br />

completed, he was retained by the Cleary-<br />

Strauss & Irwin flackery to perform a<br />

s<strong>im</strong>ilar chore for an NBC-TV special<br />

starring Tennessee Ernie Ford.<br />

Recently, it became known that Weiser's<br />

always-effective services were again available.<br />

He was virtually deluged with offers.<br />

Out of it all, he decided to return to<br />

C. S. & I. as, what Madison Avenue would<br />

call, an account executive. He has already<br />

assumed the stewardship and responsibility<br />

for three <strong>im</strong>portant assignments, to<br />

wit:<br />

Serving as special coordinator of all promotional<br />

activities in connection with the<br />

hard-ticket engagements in Los Angeles<br />

and San Francisco of "Sunrise at Campobello,"<br />

the Dore Schary production.<br />

Handling publicity for producer William<br />

Claxton, who has returned to the fabrication<br />

of theatrical film fare after a hiatus<br />

bout with television. Claxton's upcoming<br />

picture is "Desire in the Dust," which will<br />

be distributed by 20th Century-Fox and<br />

was made for Associated Producers, Inc.,<br />

the 20th-Fox affiliate <strong>im</strong>presarioed by<br />

Lippert.<br />

Doing some special exploitation work on<br />

all of the forthcoming features under the<br />

aegis of the same Lippert.<br />

, BOXOFFICE August 29, 1960 W-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!