- Page 1:
HYDRAULIC EFFICIENCY OF GRATE AND C
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .
- Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1: Map of
- Page 9 and 10:
Figure 5-7: Predicted vs. observed
- Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1: Summary o
- Page 13 and 14:
LIST OF SYMBOLS, UNITS OF MEASURE,
- Page 15 and 16:
S c , Sc, cross slope cross (or lat
- Page 17 and 18:
ID mag meter No. QC ® R5 R9 R12 R1
- Page 19 and 20:
1 INTRODUCTION A research program w
- Page 21 and 22:
1-1 often require use of these thre
- Page 23 and 24:
2 LITERATURE REVIEW Urban storm dra
- Page 25 and 26:
• All grates showed patterns of i
- Page 27 and 28:
Q = Q w + Q s Equation 2-1 where: 2
- Page 29 and 30:
Inlet Name Bar P-1-7/8 Bar P-1-7/8-
- Page 31 and 32:
2.2.3 Curb Opening Inlets Curb open
- Page 33 and 34:
2.3 Manning’s Equation Uniform fl
- Page 35 and 36:
where: q 1 = dependent parameter; q
- Page 37:
Q ⎛ L L Qw ⎞ = f ⎜ , ⎟ Equa
- Page 40 and 41:
Headbox Pipe Network Inlets Street
- Page 42 and 43:
capacity. A similar study performed
- Page 44 and 45:
Table 3-3: Test matrix for 0.33-ft
- Page 46 and 47:
Table 3-5: Test matrix for 1-ft pro
- Page 48 and 49:
Solid Plexiglas ® was milled to pr
- Page 50 and 51:
Figure 3-10: Triple No. 13 combinat
- Page 52 and 53:
Figure 3-16: Single No. 16 combinat
- Page 54 and 55:
Figure 3-22: Single No. 16 combinat
- Page 56 and 57:
Note Safety Bar Figure 3-28: R5 wit
- Page 58 and 59:
Flow entering and exiting the model
- Page 60 and 61:
Following a standardized testing pr
- Page 63 and 64:
4 DATA AND OBSERVATIONS Testing res
- Page 65 and 66:
Figure 4-2: Type 16 combination-inl
- Page 67 and 68:
45 40 35 Captured flow (cfs) 30 25
- Page 69 and 70:
5 ANALYSIS AND RESULTS Data selecte
- Page 71 and 72:
likely due to the nature of the ori
- Page 73 and 74:
1 Observed 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4
- Page 75 and 76:
Total flow (Q) is known from the ob
- Page 77 and 78:
Observed 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4
- Page 79 and 80:
1 0.9 Observed 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4
- Page 81 and 82:
The second Pi group is the square o
- Page 83 and 84:
Table 5-2: Empirical equations for
- Page 85 and 86:
Agreement is best at the smallest f
- Page 87 and 88:
Efficiency/base efficiency 2.2 2 1.
- Page 89 and 90:
were typically seen at higher flow
- Page 91 and 92:
Average difference in calculated ef
- Page 93:
Depth (ft) Table 5-3: Efficiency er
- Page 96 and 97:
test data for typical design depths
- Page 98 and 99:
Observed efficiency 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0
- Page 101: 7 REFERENCES Bos, M. G. (1989). Dis
- Page 105 and 106: (P-1-7/8 grate does not have the 10
- Page 107 and 108: Figure A-3: Curved vane grate (UDFC
- Page 109 and 110: Figure A-5: 30º-tilt bar grate (UD
- Page 111: APPENDIX B ON-GRADE TEST DATA 93
- Page 114 and 115: Test ID Number Configuration Table
- Page 116 and 117: Table B-3: 2% and 1% on-grade test
- Page 118 and 119: Test ID Number Configuration Longit
- Page 120 and 121: Test ID Number Configuration Table
- Page 122 and 123: Table B-7: Additional debris tests
- Page 124 and 125: 106
- Page 126 and 127: For the additional sump tests, only
- Page 128 and 129: 110
- Page 130 and 131: (a) (b) Figure D-2: Type 16 inlet s
- Page 132 and 133: (a) (b) (c) Figure D-4: Type R curb
- Page 134 and 135: 116
- Page 136 and 137: Extent of Flow Station (x) Position
- Page 138 and 139: 120
- Page 140 and 141: Test ID Number depth (ft) Tw (ft) A
- Page 142 and 143: Table F-2: Additional parameters fo
- Page 144 and 145: Test ID Number depth (ft) Tw (ft) A
- Page 146 and 147: Test ID Number depth (ft) Tw (ft) A
- Page 148 and 149: 130
- Page 150 and 151: 132
- Page 154 and 155: The REG Procedure Model: MODEL1 Dep
- Page 156 and 157: Plot of logE*pred. Legend: A = 1 ob
- Page 158 and 159: Plot of rstudent*pred. Legend: A =
- Page 160 and 161: 142
- Page 162 and 163: 144
- Page 164 and 165: Test ID Number Depth (ft) Grates Fl
- Page 166 and 167: Test ID Number Depth (ft) Grates Fl
- Page 168 and 169: Test ID Number Depth Length Flow Ef