Hydraulic Efficiency of Grate and Curb Inlets - Urban Drainage and ...
Hydraulic Efficiency of Grate and Curb Inlets - Urban Drainage and ...
Hydraulic Efficiency of Grate and Curb Inlets - Urban Drainage and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
45.0<br />
40.0<br />
35.0<br />
Captured flow (cfs)<br />
30.0<br />
25.0<br />
20.0<br />
15.0<br />
10.0<br />
5.0<br />
0.0<br />
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2<br />
Gutterline flow depth (ft)<br />
5 ft 9 ft 12 ft 15 ft<br />
Figure 4-6: Type R curb inlet sump test data<br />
Several general trends can be found in the sump test data:<br />
• For a given flow depth, a longer inlet results in higher captured flow.<br />
• As the flow depth increases, the corresponding captured flow increases.<br />
• For a given inlet length, the Type 13 inlet is generally the most efficient, followed by<br />
the Type 16 <strong>and</strong> Type R.<br />
4.3 Summary<br />
A sample <strong>of</strong> the collected data set was presented in tabular form <strong>and</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the data<br />
presented in graphical form. The entire data set in presented in Appendices B <strong>and</strong> C. Qualitative<br />
observations were made regarding the nature <strong>of</strong> flow in the model <strong>and</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> the inlets<br />
tested. For the on-grade tests, flow velocity <strong>and</strong> depth were found to be the primary influencing<br />
parameters on efficiency. Street longitudinal slope primarily affected flow velocity, <strong>and</strong> cross<br />
slope primarily affected the spread <strong>of</strong> flow across the model street section. A detailed regression<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> the on-grade test data, development <strong>of</strong> design equations, <strong>and</strong> qualitative observations<br />
are presented in the analysis chapter <strong>of</strong> this report.<br />
50