14.10.2014 Views

Hydraulic Efficiency of Grate and Curb Inlets - Urban Drainage and ...

Hydraulic Efficiency of Grate and Curb Inlets - Urban Drainage and ...

Hydraulic Efficiency of Grate and Curb Inlets - Urban Drainage and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Observed<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

1 ft depth<br />

0.5 ft depth<br />

0.33 ft depth<br />

Equal<br />

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1<br />

Predicted<br />

Figure 5-9: Predicted vs. observed efficiency for Type 16 combination-inlet from empirical equation<br />

Observed<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

1 ft depth<br />

0.5 ft depth<br />

0.33 ft depth<br />

Equal<br />

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1<br />

Predicted<br />

Figure 5-10: Predicted vs. observed efficiency for Type R curb inlet from empirical equation<br />

By developing new equations to predict efficiency, it was possible to further improve<br />

predictions for inlet efficiency over previous sections. With new equations presented here, the<br />

average error in predicted efficiency was reduced to about 5% for all inlets with R 2 values<br />

between 0.84 <strong>and</strong> 0.90. Overall agreement between observed <strong>and</strong> predicted efficiency is<br />

improved over previous methods for all test depths. A comparison is shown in Figure 5-11<br />

through Figure 5-13 between the empirical equations <strong>and</strong> the improved UDFCD methods.<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!