03.11.2014 Views

Before the FERC Application for New License for the Annex Creek ...

Before the FERC Application for New License for the Annex Creek ...

Before the FERC Application for New License for the Annex Creek ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX 0-1<br />

ALTERNATIVE FAIR VALUE CALCLILATION<br />

The fair value of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Annex</strong> <strong>Creek</strong>. and Salmon <strong>Creek</strong>. Hydroelectric<br />

Project was determined to be <strong>the</strong> cost of constructing <strong>the</strong> existing features in<br />

1985, as described in Section 2.1. An alternative method, which yields a different<br />

measure of <strong>the</strong> fa i r value, is to determi ne <strong>the</strong> or i gi na 1 va 1 ue of <strong>the</strong><br />

Project at a 1985 level less an amount <strong>for</strong> depreciation. This method, which<br />

is described in detail below, was considered <strong>for</strong> this Project but not used due<br />

to i ncomp 1 ete records of changes to Project features over <strong>the</strong> 1 i fe of <strong>the</strong><br />

Project.<br />

To determine <strong>the</strong> Project's original value at a 1985 level in <strong>the</strong><br />

alternative fair value analysis, <strong>the</strong> original cost of each feature is escalated<br />

from its construction completion date to <strong>the</strong> 1985 level. This escalated<br />

original value is <strong>the</strong>n reduced by an amount <strong>for</strong> actual depreciation, called<br />

percent condition. Percent condition is defined as <strong>the</strong> original cost less<br />

book. depreciation (or net investment) divided by <strong>the</strong> original cost (or total<br />

oj nvestment). The percent condi tion <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Project was ca 1 cul ated by <strong>FERC</strong><br />

account <strong>for</strong> each Component, as shown in Table DS-1.<br />

Several gaps in <strong>the</strong> property ledgers made it difficult to accurately<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> original value and year of completion of each Project feature.<br />

Without this in<strong>for</strong>mation, escalating <strong>the</strong> original value to a 1985 level 1s<br />

near 1 y i mpos sib 1 e. There<strong>for</strong>e, th is method was determi ned as inaccurate and,<br />

thus, <strong>the</strong> fair value method described in Section 2.1 was used.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!