13.11.2014 Views

2011 EMC Directory & Design Guide - Interference Technology

2011 EMC Directory & Design Guide - Interference Technology

2011 EMC Directory & Design Guide - Interference Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

shielding / cables & connectors<br />

Num e ric a l S o l u t i o n of C o mpl e x <strong>EMC</strong> Probl e m s<br />

Entry Analytical [pF/m] FEM Solver [pF/m] Relative Error [%]<br />

C11 14.9395 14.9718 0.22<br />

C12 -6.0894 -5.5062 9.58<br />

C22 18.8111 18.7565 0.29<br />

C13 -1.6117 -1.4734 8.58<br />

C23 -6.0894 -5.5069 9.56<br />

C33 14.9395 14.9710 0.21<br />

Figure 4. Selection of some of the cable types supported in FEKO.<br />

Figure 5. Parameters for the computation of the per unit length<br />

inductances of widely separated wires above a ground plane.<br />

Table 1. Transmission line per unit length capacitance matrix entries<br />

for three widely spaced conductors above ground: Comparison of<br />

analytical values with the numerical static FEM solution.<br />

the cross sectional dimension information about a specific<br />

line is contained in these parameters.<br />

Under the fundamental transverse electromagnetic field<br />

structure assumption, the per unit length parameters of<br />

inductance, capacitance, and conductance are determined<br />

as a static solution to Laplace’s equation 2 (x,y)=0 in the<br />

two-dimensional cross sectional (x,y) plane of the line.<br />

The determination of the per unit length parameters can<br />

be simple or very difficult depending on whether the cross<br />

sections of the conductors are circular or rectangular, and<br />

whether the conductors are surrounded by a homogeneous<br />

or an inhomogeneous dielectric medium.<br />

In fact, there are very few transmission lines for which<br />

the cross sectional fields can be solved analytically to give<br />

simple formulas for the per unit length parameters. To illustrate,<br />

the self-inductance and mutual inductance terms<br />

of n widely spaced cores above an infinite ground (see Figure<br />

5) can be derived as [9]<br />

Figure 6. Field excitation of a transmission line using only voltage<br />

sources (Agrawal method).<br />

where x denotes the longitudinal direction and parameters<br />

Z and Y are the per unit length impedance and admittance<br />

parameters of the line<br />

Z = jωL + R<br />

Y = jωC + G.<br />

As a generalization to the two-conductor system, a multiconductor<br />

transmission line model is simply a distributed<br />

parameter network for an arbitrary cable cross section (see<br />

Figure 4) where the voltages and currents can vary in magnitude<br />

and in phase over its length.<br />

Per Unit Length Cable Parameters<br />

The per unit length parameters of inductance, capacitance,<br />

resistance and conductance are essential ingredients in the<br />

determination of transmission line voltages and currents<br />

from the solution of the transmission line equations. All of<br />

where r wi<br />

is the wire radius, h i<br />

is the wire height above<br />

ground and s ij<br />

is the center to center spacing between wires.<br />

If however these cores are surrounded by an insulation<br />

medium or the separation is not wide, one has no alternative<br />

but to employ approximate, numerical methods. In<br />

FEKO a 2D static FEM solver to Laplace’s equation is used.<br />

Table 1 compares the analytic to the numerical per unit<br />

length capacitance matrix entries for 3 wires above ground<br />

(r w1<br />

=r w3<br />

=1.0 mm, r w2<br />

= 1.5 mm, h 1<br />

=h 3<br />

=52 mm, h 2<br />

=50 mm,<br />

s 12<br />

=s 23<br />

=15.13 mm, s 13<br />

=30 mm. The 2D FEM solution is based<br />

on minimizing the stored field energy per unit length. The<br />

self-capacitance matrix entries are a direct function of the<br />

total energy in the system, and hence these terms agree<br />

very well with those of the analytic prediction. The mutual<br />

capacitance matrix entries are derived from the FEM solution<br />

(integration over -) and as such use a lower order approximation,<br />

also explaining the larger differences between<br />

the analytic and numerical solutions.<br />

82 interference technology emc <strong>Directory</strong> & design guide <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!