16.11.2014 Views

Antropomotoryka nr 55.indb - Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w ...

Antropomotoryka nr 55.indb - Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w ...

Antropomotoryka nr 55.indb - Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Iosif M. Feigenberg, Wacław Petryński<br />

Table 1. The sequence of A, B, C and D signals in the experiments with groups of consisting of four stimuli (experiment 3)<br />

Sequence of stimuli B C A D C B D A A C B D<br />

The position of a stimulus in general<br />

sequence<br />

The position of a stimulus in a<br />

group of four<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />

I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV<br />

Experiment 4. The aim of this experiment was<br />

determination why the reaction to stimulus anticipated<br />

with higher probability is being performed quicker. At<br />

first a sound signal was emitted and 1.5 s later – a light<br />

stimulus, calling for swift movement of left or right hand.<br />

The sound signal eliminated the temporal uncertainty,<br />

but it remained the uncertainty whether the left or the<br />

right hand will be used. In the first part of the experiment<br />

the stimuli for both hands were shown randomly.<br />

They prompted broad activation (pre-preparation) of<br />

skeleto-muscular system of both hands. In Fig. 3 there<br />

are shown the electromyographic (EMG) and galvanic<br />

skin reactions (GSR) graphs recorded in the experiment.<br />

It is to be seen the wide pre-preparation of the<br />

muscles of both left and right hand.<br />

Then the stimulus for only one, always the same<br />

(left) hand was shown, and the pre-preparation became<br />

more local nature (Fig. 4).<br />

As seen in Figure 4, the sound signal brings about<br />

activation of only left hand muscles. So, it was shown that<br />

the more accurate probabilistic prognosis, the more local<br />

and, consequently, more economic pre-preparation.<br />

Experiment 5. The experiment has been aimed at<br />

determination how important is the locality of pre-preparation.<br />

The examinee had one or two mobile switches<br />

(MS) in hands, whereas two stationary switches (SS)<br />

were attached to the table.<br />

In the first part of experiment the examinee had<br />

one MS in one hand. After a stimulus presentation, he/<br />

she should touch an appropriate SS, which were attached<br />

close to each other at the same side of the hand<br />

with the MS.<br />

In the second part of the experiment the examinee<br />

had two MS in both hands, whereas one SS was<br />

placed to the left and the other to the right of the left<br />

Figure 3. EMG and GSR reactions to warning signal (Attention!)<br />

and releasing stimulus at the beginning of experiment<br />

Figure 4. The sound signal “Attention!” warns that in short will be<br />

emitted the light stimulus calling for response with the left hand<br />

1 RT 1 = 311 ms<br />

2<br />

3<br />

RT 2 = 332 ms<br />

RT 3 = 362 ms<br />

– Stationary switch – Mobile switch<br />

Figure 5. The arrangement of three parts of experiment 5 [6]<br />

– 20 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!