16.11.2014 Views

Antropomotoryka nr 55.indb - Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w ...

Antropomotoryka nr 55.indb - Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w ...

Antropomotoryka nr 55.indb - Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Effect of walking on body composition and aerobic fitness in non-trained men of middle age<br />

cant dependence of VO 2<br />

max on this variable. The relationship<br />

between VO 2<br />

max and physical performance<br />

was often presented in literature [e.g. Astrand and<br />

Rodahl 7]. In our group of men this dependence was<br />

significant too (r = 0.796, p < 0.005). In practice this<br />

coefficient could be used as one of important criteria<br />

for exercise program efficiency.<br />

The significant positive ECM/BCM dependence on<br />

age could be used for assessment of actual development<br />

state – biological age in subjects. In actual case<br />

we compared real value of ECM/BCM with value that<br />

was calculated according to general relationship that<br />

was true for adult men.<br />

In normal subjects of middle age, ECM/BCM ratios<br />

are recorded between 0.75 and 1.00. Deviations from<br />

such figures toward higher values are due either to the<br />

erosion of BCM (catabolism) or to fluid expansion in extracellular<br />

spaces (edema). In the case of dehydration,<br />

we can observe the opposite phenomenon where the<br />

ECM/BCM ration is reduced.<br />

Because the diet of followed subject was practically<br />

without significant alterations during whole 5 months,<br />

the significant increase in both FFM and BCM may be<br />

probably caused by imposed training program.<br />

The changes in VO 2max<br />

induced by endurance walking<br />

program are practically consistent with those found<br />

by Proper et al. [19], who found in group of men and<br />

women of similar age 14% increase in aerobic fitness,<br />

and significant increase in FFM and significant decrease<br />

in BF and total body mass. These results were<br />

confirmed by our data but the changes in BC variables<br />

were not so high. The cause could be in participation of<br />

both sexes on study of Proper et al. [19].<br />

There is evidence to show that the magnitude of<br />

the increase in VO 2<br />

max is dependent on total energy<br />

expenditure of exercise, and thus on frequency, and<br />

duration of exercise as a number of previous investigations<br />

have shown improvement to be in direct proportion<br />

to the number of weekly sessions [8]. According to<br />

the results of previous studies, VO 2<br />

max as measured<br />

either in laboratory or in field has generally improved<br />

during the first months of conscription among nontrained<br />

subjects [5].<br />

The minimum training energy expenditure required<br />

to maintain an elevated VO 2<br />

max has not been clearly<br />

established. For example the most recent ACSM prescription<br />

guidelines (1995) recommended minimal<br />

energy expenditure of 300 kcal per exercise session<br />

performed three days a week or 200 kcal per exercise<br />

session performed four days per week.<br />

Adequate energy output has its effect both in the<br />

presence and in the absence of other influences, and<br />

the beneficial relationship continues with advancing<br />

age.<br />

In conclusion, physical training in energy expenditure<br />

higher than 1500 kcal per week realised with help<br />

of activities on which are subjects highly adapted may<br />

significantly improve the maximal oxygen uptake, body<br />

composition and motor performance (speed of running)<br />

in non-trained men of middle age.<br />

LITERATURE • PIŚMIENNICTWO<br />

[1] Spirduso WW: Physical dimensions of aging. Champaign,<br />

Human Kinetics, 1995.<br />

[2] Blanchard J, Co<strong>nr</strong>ad KA, Harrison GG: Comparison of<br />

methods for estimating body composition in young and<br />

elderly women. J Geront Biol Sci Med Sci. 1990; 45:<br />

B119–B24.<br />

[3] Bunc V, Štilec M, Moravcová J, Matouš M: Body composition<br />

determination by whole body bioimpedance measurement<br />

in women seniors. Acta Univ Carol, 2000.<br />

[4] Roche AF, Heymsfi eld SB, Lohman TG: Human body<br />

composition. Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics, 1996.<br />

[5] Blair SN, Connelly JC: How much physical activity should<br />

we do? The case for moderate amounts and Intensities<br />

of physical activity. RQES 1996; 67(2): 193–205.<br />

[6] Haskell W, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin<br />

BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A:<br />

Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation<br />

for adults from the American College of Sports<br />

Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci<br />

Sports Exercise, 2007; 39: 1423–1434.<br />

[7] Astrand PO, Rodahl K: Textbook of Work Physiology.<br />

New York: McGraw Hill; 1986.<br />

[8] Bunc V: A simple method for estimating aerobic fi tness.<br />

Ergonomics 1994; 37(1): 159–165. Kinathropologica<br />

2000; 36 (1): 23–38.<br />

[9] Deurenberg P, Schouten FJM: Loss of total body water<br />

and extracellular water assessed by multifrequency impedance.<br />

Eur J Clin Nutr, 1992; 4: 247–55.<br />

[10] Stewart AL, Verboncoer CJ, McLellan BY, Gillis DE,<br />

Rush S, Mills KM, Ritter PL, Brown BW: Physical activity<br />

outcomes of CHAMPS II: A physical activity promotion<br />

program for older adults. J Geront Ser A – Biol Sci Med<br />

Sci, 2001; 58 (8): M465–M70.<br />

[11] Le Masurier GC, Sidman CL, Corbin CB: Accumulating<br />

10 000 steps: Does this meet current physical activity<br />

guidelines? RQES 2003; 74 (4): 389–394.<br />

[12] Karasik D, Demissie S, Cupples LA, Kiel DP: Disentangling<br />

the genetic determinants of human aging: Biological<br />

age as an alternative to the use of survival measures. J<br />

Geront, 2005; 60 (5): 574–87.<br />

– 45 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!