16.11.2014 Views

Antropomotoryka nr 55.indb - Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w ...

Antropomotoryka nr 55.indb - Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w ...

Antropomotoryka nr 55.indb - Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Alina Klonova, Juris Klonovs, Andrea Giovanardi, Antonio Cicchella<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Fig. 4. Dancers’ maximum knee angles in each standard dance (Q = Quickstep ; SW = Slow Waltz ; T = Tango; SF = Slow Foxtrot;<br />

VW = Viennese Waltz)<br />

knees excursion in our sample. In the following figure<br />

2 are shown angles between the dancer’s hips in the<br />

transversal plane versus time in five standard dances.<br />

Dancers performed the same five sequences of standard<br />

dance: Slow Waltz Double Reverse Spin, Tango<br />

Natural Pivot, Foxtrot Reverse Turn, Viennese Waltz<br />

Flacker, Quickstep Polka. The angles are different in<br />

each dance. In Tango both knees angles behave in<br />

a very similar way. It is clearly visible that they follows<br />

the tempo. It is interesting to note that in all dance sequences<br />

the hip alignment between partners is not paralleled,<br />

and the spread is high. From a technical point<br />

of view it should be desirable that this angle is keep to<br />

the minimum because these sequences was danced in<br />

partners’ close body contacts (Fig. 2).<br />

Hip angle (alignment between the two dancers)<br />

show a positive correlation with dancing experience in<br />

Viennese Waltz (r = 0.41) and a weak correlation in Slow<br />

Waltz (r = 0.21 p < 0.05). Interestingly, hip angle alignment<br />

in Viennese Waltz is correlated with years of experience<br />

in dancing in a couple. This is also explained by the close<br />

proximity between the dancers required by this style.<br />

Knee angles are reported in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4.<br />

As for male vs female differences in kinematics,<br />

none of the flexion knees angles is statistically different<br />

at the T test. These differences are linked inherently to<br />

the techniques used in the different styles, to the body<br />

characteristics (height) and , where symmetrical motion<br />

of lower limbs is requested by the performance, to the<br />

guiding role of the male athletes.<br />

Top versus non-top athletes.<br />

Age of professional athletes (n. 12) is lower in respect<br />

to non professional (n. 18) 29 vs 25,7 years.<br />

We didn’t found statistically significant differences in<br />

VO 2<br />

max, anaerobic threshold, lactate and maximum<br />

speed between professional and amateur athletes (57,5<br />

vs 57,5 ml/kg/min for VO 2<br />

max; 39,6 vs 41,9 ml/kg/min<br />

for AnThr; 9,7 vs 9,3 mm/L for lactate; 16,3 and 15,7<br />

km/h for max speed). Any correlation was found between<br />

the position in the world ranking of professional<br />

athletes and VO 2<br />

max, and lactate.<br />

Hip alignment is significantly different between<br />

the professional and amateur athletes in Slow Foxtrot<br />

(t 18, 0.002<br />

= 3,60) and Viennese Waltz ( t 18, 0.016<br />

= 2,63), having<br />

the top level athletes a lower angles between the<br />

hips of the two dancers thus showing a better alignment<br />

capacity (21.6 vs 26.6 in quickstep; 24,56 vs 29 in waltz;<br />

25,1 vs 27 in tango; 14,2 vs 22,7 in slow foxtrot; 32,3 vs<br />

43,1 in viennese waltz). Advanced athletes in comparison<br />

to amateur athletes show a less pronounced flexion<br />

angle in the right knee in Slow Waltz (t 18, 0.042<br />

= 2,18) and<br />

they flex the knee more deeply in Viennese Waltz in<br />

comparison to the group of amateurs (minimum angle<br />

of right knee flexion t 18, 0.014<br />

= 2,71 and minimum angle of<br />

left flex knee flexion, t 18, 0.004<br />

= 3.27). These differences<br />

can be due to strongest leg muscles.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Physiological and biomechanical characteristics were<br />

proposed as performance model in sport dance. The<br />

physiological profile of sport dancers, males and females<br />

and of different level of qualification was provided.<br />

We found an increase in age of the athletes<br />

competing at top level and a better maximal aerobic<br />

capacity in comparison to previous studies, while body<br />

dimensions seem to be unchanged over time. This increase<br />

in maximal aerobic capacity characteristics of<br />

– 36 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!