Agroecology and the Struggle for Food Sovereignty ... - Yale University
Agroecology and the Struggle for Food Sovereignty ... - Yale University
Agroecology and the Struggle for Food Sovereignty ... - Yale University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
zimmerer<br />
31<br />
An Exp<strong>and</strong>ing Interface with Agriculture<br />
Will Change Global Conservation<br />
Karl S. Zimmerer<br />
The growth <strong>and</strong> evolution of conservation is resulting in a much-exp<strong>and</strong>ed interface<br />
with agriculture <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>for</strong>ms of resource use (livestock-raising, <strong>for</strong>est extraction,<br />
fishing, hunting). The widespread commitment to protected-area conservation is<br />
argued to offer a number of similarities <strong>and</strong> some key differences with respect to<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r main dimensions of environmental globalization (see Mol 2001; Speth 2001).<br />
Rapid growth of <strong>the</strong> interface 1 of conservation with agriculture <strong>and</strong> resource use is<br />
driven by both <strong>the</strong> profusion of designated protected areas <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> management<br />
characteristics of enlarged conservation ef<strong>for</strong>ts. The worldwide coverage of<br />
designated protected areas has exp<strong>and</strong>ed more than ten times in area during <strong>the</strong> past<br />
few decades (Zimmerer et al. 2004). Measuring less than 1 million km 2 in 1970, <strong>and</strong><br />
estimated at 5.2 million km 2 in 1985, <strong>the</strong> area of publicly designated protected areas<br />
grew to more than 12.2 million km 2 in 1997 <strong>and</strong> has been estimated to cover 14.2<br />
million km 2 by 2003.<br />
Incorporation of agriculture <strong>and</strong> resource use into conservation programs is an<br />
important characteristic of <strong>the</strong> expansion of global conservation <strong>and</strong> protected areas<br />
(Zimmerer 2005). By 1997, nearly 60 percent of protected areas were classified as<br />
zones of agricultural or resource use (Zimmerer et al. 2004). Equally or more<br />
persuasive than this quantitative measure, since it sums up <strong>the</strong> often inaccurate<br />
estimates of <strong>the</strong> global conservation databases, is <strong>the</strong> rhetorical purpose that is served<br />
by presenting <strong>and</strong> publicizing <strong>the</strong>se numbers. Certain influential segments of <strong>the</strong><br />
global conservation movement badly want to incorporate resource <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> uses,<br />
such as agriculture, into <strong>the</strong> main agenda (McNeely <strong>and</strong> Scherr 2003).<br />
The increased interface of conservation areas with agriculture <strong>and</strong> resource use is<br />
an integral part of a sustainability emphasis in conservation that gained prominence<br />
in <strong>the</strong> late 1980s <strong>and</strong> early 1990s. The term “sustainability,” which refers to <strong>the</strong><br />
exp<strong>and</strong>ed attention to l<strong>and</strong> use that is environmentally sound <strong>and</strong> adequately<br />
remunerative from an economic viewpoint, has become one of <strong>the</strong> defining goals of<br />
much conservation worldwide. The goal of sustainability has been granted a level of<br />
priority similar to strict preservation in certain conservation circles.<br />
1 The term “interface” highlights<br />
<strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> interaction<br />
of <strong>the</strong> large expansion<br />
of designated conservation<br />
areas may present any one of<br />
several relations to agriculture<br />
that range from conflict to<br />
incorporation.<br />
yale school of <strong>for</strong>estry & environmental studies