23.11.2014 Views

Agroecology and the Struggle for Food Sovereignty ... - Yale University

Agroecology and the Struggle for Food Sovereignty ... - Yale University

Agroecology and the Struggle for Food Sovereignty ... - Yale University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

case study: from local to national – scaling up agroecology in brazil<br />

87<br />

Case Study: From Local to National –<br />

Scaling Up <strong>Agroecology</strong> in Brazil<br />

Jean Marc von der Weid<br />

<strong>Agroecology</strong> is accepted as an important tool <strong>for</strong> sustainable development of family<br />

farming in Brazil by various governmental <strong>and</strong> civil society organizations, from<br />

municipal to national administrative levels. Ministers of Agrarian Development <strong>and</strong><br />

of Environment, heads of agronomic research entities, state governors, <strong>and</strong> many<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r officials have been <strong>and</strong> are engaged in finding ways to facilitate agroecological<br />

development in <strong>the</strong> country. All three national family farmers organizations, <strong>the</strong> Vía<br />

Campesina coalition, <strong>the</strong> National Confederation of Agricultural Workers<br />

(CONTAG), <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Family Farmers Federation (FETRAF) have defined agroecology<br />

as <strong>the</strong>ir main strategic tool to achieve agricultural sustainability.<br />

Civil society organizations (CSOs) got toge<strong>the</strong>r in August 2002 in Rio de Janeiro<br />

to create a new <strong>and</strong> broad national network <strong>for</strong> agroecology, known in Brazil by <strong>the</strong><br />

acronym ANA. Luiz Ignacio Lula da Silva, <strong>the</strong> president of Brazil, strongly committed<br />

himself to ANA’s proposals. But <strong>the</strong>se political endorsements of CSO proposals do<br />

not mean that agroecology will automatically become <strong>the</strong> dominant system of<br />

Brazilian agriculture. First of all, agroecology’s usefulness is recognized by most only<br />

<strong>for</strong> small farming activities, whereas Green Revolution approaches are seen as <strong>the</strong><br />

only possible alternative <strong>for</strong> large-scale farming. Second <strong>and</strong> most important is <strong>the</strong><br />

strong disparity between government discourse <strong>and</strong> implemented policies. There is a<br />

wide gap between intentions <strong>and</strong> actual administrative capacity to promote a conversion<br />

from conventional approaches to agroecological ones. There are policy <strong>for</strong>mulation<br />

problems <strong>and</strong>, more than that, institutional cultures that are strongly rooted<br />

in completely different paradigms.<br />

Why has agroecology become so important in Brazil, at least as one important<br />

path towards sustainability? What lessons can be learned from <strong>the</strong> 25-year history of<br />

<strong>the</strong> agroecological movement in <strong>the</strong> country? What can be done to mainstream <strong>the</strong>se<br />

experiences?<br />

yale school of <strong>for</strong>estry & environmental studies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!