Agroecology and the Struggle for Food Sovereignty ... - Yale University
Agroecology and the Struggle for Food Sovereignty ... - Yale University
Agroecology and the Struggle for Food Sovereignty ... - Yale University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
case study: from local to national – scaling up agroecology in brazil<br />
87<br />
Case Study: From Local to National –<br />
Scaling Up <strong>Agroecology</strong> in Brazil<br />
Jean Marc von der Weid<br />
<strong>Agroecology</strong> is accepted as an important tool <strong>for</strong> sustainable development of family<br />
farming in Brazil by various governmental <strong>and</strong> civil society organizations, from<br />
municipal to national administrative levels. Ministers of Agrarian Development <strong>and</strong><br />
of Environment, heads of agronomic research entities, state governors, <strong>and</strong> many<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r officials have been <strong>and</strong> are engaged in finding ways to facilitate agroecological<br />
development in <strong>the</strong> country. All three national family farmers organizations, <strong>the</strong> Vía<br />
Campesina coalition, <strong>the</strong> National Confederation of Agricultural Workers<br />
(CONTAG), <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Family Farmers Federation (FETRAF) have defined agroecology<br />
as <strong>the</strong>ir main strategic tool to achieve agricultural sustainability.<br />
Civil society organizations (CSOs) got toge<strong>the</strong>r in August 2002 in Rio de Janeiro<br />
to create a new <strong>and</strong> broad national network <strong>for</strong> agroecology, known in Brazil by <strong>the</strong><br />
acronym ANA. Luiz Ignacio Lula da Silva, <strong>the</strong> president of Brazil, strongly committed<br />
himself to ANA’s proposals. But <strong>the</strong>se political endorsements of CSO proposals do<br />
not mean that agroecology will automatically become <strong>the</strong> dominant system of<br />
Brazilian agriculture. First of all, agroecology’s usefulness is recognized by most only<br />
<strong>for</strong> small farming activities, whereas Green Revolution approaches are seen as <strong>the</strong><br />
only possible alternative <strong>for</strong> large-scale farming. Second <strong>and</strong> most important is <strong>the</strong><br />
strong disparity between government discourse <strong>and</strong> implemented policies. There is a<br />
wide gap between intentions <strong>and</strong> actual administrative capacity to promote a conversion<br />
from conventional approaches to agroecological ones. There are policy <strong>for</strong>mulation<br />
problems <strong>and</strong>, more than that, institutional cultures that are strongly rooted<br />
in completely different paradigms.<br />
Why has agroecology become so important in Brazil, at least as one important<br />
path towards sustainability? What lessons can be learned from <strong>the</strong> 25-year history of<br />
<strong>the</strong> agroecological movement in <strong>the</strong> country? What can be done to mainstream <strong>the</strong>se<br />
experiences?<br />
yale school of <strong>for</strong>estry & environmental studies