Agroecology and the Struggle for Food Sovereignty ... - Yale University
Agroecology and the Struggle for Food Sovereignty ... - Yale University
Agroecology and the Struggle for Food Sovereignty ... - Yale University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
levins<br />
37<br />
A Whole-System View of Agriculture, People,<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rest of Nature<br />
Richard Levins<br />
My comments are influenced by three sets of experiences. First, as an ecologist<br />
working in public health <strong>and</strong> agricultural science, I am struck by <strong>the</strong> similarities<br />
between <strong>the</strong>m. Agriculture is like medicine: both depend on natural <strong>and</strong> social<br />
phenomena, both have vital roles in promoting human welfare, <strong>and</strong> both receive<br />
generous public support. Their underpinnings combine traditional <strong>and</strong> modern<br />
scientific knowledge. Both are increasingly commodified, turned into objects <strong>for</strong><br />
buying <strong>and</strong> selling <strong>for</strong> profit in our economy. Both show a pattern of successes <strong>and</strong><br />
failures that is not dictated by nature but by <strong>the</strong> way knowledge is created.<br />
Secondly, I have had <strong>the</strong> privilege of being a participant/observer in three different<br />
kinds of society: as a scientist in <strong>the</strong> most modern United States capitalism; as a<br />
farmer, organizer, <strong>and</strong> biologist in <strong>the</strong> colonial capitalism of Puerto Rico; <strong>and</strong> as a scientific<br />
advisor in socialist Cuba. When we compare conditions in different places,<br />
<strong>the</strong>re are advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages to comparing places that are very similar or<br />
places that are very different. When I compare Massachusetts with Rhode Isl<strong>and</strong>, or<br />
<strong>the</strong> U.S. <strong>and</strong> Canada, <strong>the</strong>y are similar insofar that it is relatively easy to pick out <strong>the</strong><br />
causes <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir different health conditions. When we compare very different places,<br />
it is harder to separate individual factors because <strong>the</strong>y differ in so many ways, but <strong>the</strong><br />
comparisons challenge our assumptions as to what is a constant, <strong>and</strong> it unveils alternatives.<br />
Cuba is especially interesting because it is a poor country <strong>and</strong> yet its health<br />
status matches that of Sweden, <strong>and</strong> it has adopted an ecological pathway of development<br />
based on equity <strong>and</strong> education. It is not even that <strong>the</strong> Cubans have made better<br />
decisions about health <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> environment, but that <strong>the</strong>y have social arrangements<br />
that favor using quite different rules <strong>for</strong> decision-making <strong>and</strong> different criteria <strong>for</strong><br />
effectiveness.<br />
Finally, I will draw on <strong>the</strong> exciting presentations <strong>and</strong> discussions of this international<br />
workshop, with its wide geographic representation <strong>and</strong> combination of academic<br />
<strong>and</strong> community-based knowledge.<br />
I will attempt to apply <strong>the</strong>se sources of ideas to several issues.<br />
yale school of <strong>for</strong>estry & environmental studies