Flash Flood Risk Management â A Training of Trainers ... - ReliefWeb

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Flash Flood Risk Management: A Training of Trainers Manual Session 7 Resource Materials Session 7 RM 7.1: The importance of community-level flash flood risk management A community is a group of multi-stakeholders in a particular geographical location who are exposed to common hazards including flash floods. The community is not a homogeneous unit but a dynamic mix of different groups, interests, and attitudes. Community-based risk assessment (Table 3) is a simple method used to assess risk and to help design risk management plans. Community involvement is essential for the successful and effective management of risk because local people have a detailed knowledge of their village and the immediate vicinity and because they have a personal and vested interest in local affairs. Local people are not only interested and motivated to help, but also have the ability and the access to local resources to carry out the needed tasks. Centralised management and responses often fall short when it comes to assessing the needs of the most vulnerable. Community mobilisation is important, as individual households cannot perform all the necessary preparations Table 3: Features of a community based approach Feature Traditional Community based Concerned party Agency Community Main actors Programme staff Community residents Decision process Top-down Bottom-up Participation Selected/token Decided by the community Impact on Creates Empowering community dependency Programme Target specific Needs specific selection Gender aspect Dominated by elites Gender sensitive effectively by themselves. A participatory approach ensures that activities are coordinated with others and that responsibilities are shared. An organising committee should bring the whole community together under a single umbrella and try to make everyone aware of available resources and of ways to protect the community; it can help to enhance confidence, skills, and the capacity to cooperate in order to undertake risk management as a communal effort. RM 7.2: Process of community participation in flash flood risk management Community involvement is essential at every step, including risk identification, prioritisation, plan formulation, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation (ADPC/ECHO/UNESCAP 2004). Community-based risk assessment can be carried out using various participatory rural appraisal (PRA) tools that encourage community members to partake in the identification of flood hazards and in the preparation of risk maps based on their knowledge and experience of the local environment, resources, and socioeconomic practices. Figure 10 shows the conceptual framework for community participation. Formation of a community flash flood risk management committee (CFFRMC) is the first step towards collecting information on the magnitude of a possible flash flood event. The CFFRMC investigates what institutions already exist and what their roles, responsibilities, and formation procedures are. It also disseminates information and provides an opportunity to involve all stakeholders including women and other marginalised groups. It is important that the CFFRMC have a legal status. When the CFFRMC is registered, it has the legal status accorded to it by the government. The CFFRMC must have a constitution with clear objectives. In addition, its structure and responsibilities, funding sources, and functioning mechanism must be clearly laid out. 48
Day 2 Figure 10: Framework for community participation Problems identification and prioritisation through community participation Session 7 Seeking solutions and need assessment through community participation Formulation of participatory planning Incorporate lessons learnt Participatory implementation Participatory evaluation Participatory monitoring Source: Based on ADPC (2003) Steps in forming a CFFRMC • Arrange a community meeting • Discuss flash flood risk with the community and draw their attention to their need to manage it • Establish an ad hoc committee of five to seven members, remembering to include people from all sectors of the community, with due concern to gender The main objective of this committee is to draw up a draft constitution and to facilitate the formation of the CFFRMC. The ad hoc committee should call for meetings to discuss the draft constitution, which should be amended to reflect the suggestions made in the mass meeting. RM 7.3: Structure, responsibilities, and empowerment of the CFFRMC A CFFRMC is a legal organisation that represents the community; it typically has 9 to 11 members who are elected from amongst a general assembly according to the procedures set forth in the constitution. The committee should ensure proper representation from different sections of society, particularly remembering to include women and disadvantaged groups. If the committee is too large, it can be difficult to notify all the members, to make decisions, and to reach consensus; while if it is too small, it may not be representative. The CFFRMC should consist of different teams or sub-committees (Figure 11) each headed by a team leader and assigned particular responsibilities. The central committee should delegate responsibility for effective team work. The advisory committee is an essential part of the CFFRMC. The advisory committee consists of representatives from concerned district-level government organisations, concerned members of local administrative units, and other members that represent the interests of the various stakeholders. It is usually chaired by the head of the local government body. 49
Page 1:
Flash Flood Risk Management A Train
Page 4 and 5:
Published by International Centre f
Page 6 and 7: Foreword The Hindu Kush-Himalayan (
Page 8 and 9: Acronyms and Abbreviations CFFRMC D
Page 10 and 11: Flash Flood Risk Management - A Tra
Page 12 and 13: Flash Flood Risk Management - A Tra
Page 15 and 16: Introduction Day 1 Session/Activity
Page 17 and 18: Day 1 Suggestions for the facilitat
Page 19 and 20: Day 1 Suggestions for the facilitat
Page 21 and 22: Day 1 Session 2 Flash Flood Hazards
Page 23 and 24: Day 1 Session 2 Resource Materials
Page 25 and 26: Day 1 RM 2.4: Flash floods in the H
Page 27 and 28: Day 1 in flash floods during the pe
Page 29 and 30: Day 1 Activity 3.2: Identifying the
Page 33 and 34: Day 1 Figure 4: Categorisation of f
Page 35 and 36: Day 1 Session 4 Flash Flood Hazard
Page 39 and 40: Day 2 Session/Activity Session 5: V
Page 41 and 42: Day 2 Activity 5.2: Flash flood ris
Page 43 and 44: Day 2 In a physically vulnerable zo
Page 45 and 46: Day 2 Step 2 Show the short video o
Page 47 and 48: Day 2 Session 6 Handouts Handout 6.
Page 49 and 50: Day 2 Figure 8: The four pillars of
Page 51 and 52: Day 2 • As a result of rapid cha
Page 53 and 54: Day 2 Session 7 Community-Based Fla
Page 55: Day 2 Step 4 Step 5 Discuss the dif
Page 59 and 60: Day 2 • First-aid and health: Th
Page 61 and 62: Day 2 Session 8 Gender Perspectives
Page 63 and 64: Day 2 The CFFRMC also plays a role
Page 65 and 66: Day 2 Note to the trainer Clarify t
Page 67 and 68: Day 2 groups such as people with di
Page 69 and 70: Day 2 RM 9.3: Process of participat
Page 71 and 72: Day 3 Session/Activity Activity tim
Page 73 and 74: Day 3 Activity 10.3: Strategies for
Page 75 and 76: Day 3 RM 10.2: Various strategies f
Page 77 and 78: disseminated. The South Asian tsuna
Page 81 and 82: Day 3 Geospatial Stream Flow Model
Page 83 and 84: Day 3 Activity 12.2: Concept and co
Page 85 and 86: Day 3 perspective means looking for
Page 87 and 88: Day 3 their livelihoods. Watershed
Page 89 and 90: Day 3 Session 13 Hazard-Specific Fl
Page 93 and 94: Day 3 where Q = discharge A = area
Page 95 and 96: Day 3 There are two types of routin
Page 97 and 98: Day 3 Box 13: Exercise on flood rou
Page 99 and 100: Day 3 Activity 14.4: Measures that
Page 101 and 102: Day 3 Figure 15: Types of landslide
Page 103 and 104: Day 3 occurs). In most documented c
Page 105 and 106: Day 3 Figure 21: Tsatichhu landslid
Page 107 and 108:
Day 3 Estimating downstream floodin
Page 109 and 110:
Day 3 Strand (1977) uses the same e
Page 111 and 112:
Day 4 Session/Activity Session 15:
Page 113 and 114:
Day 4 Session 16 Hazard-Specific Fl
Page 115 and 116:
Day 4 Session 16 Resource Materials
Page 117 and 118:
Day 4 Figure 25: Development of the
Page 119 and 120:
Day 4 RM 16.3: Impacts of GLOF even
Page 121 and 122:
Day 4 Supra or englacial drainage.
Page 123 and 124:
Day 4 Briefing for the Field Trip T
Page 125:
Days 5, 6, and 7 Field Trip
Page 128 and 129:
Flash Flood Risk Management - A Tra
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Flash Flood Risk Management: A Trai
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158:
show all

Flash Flood Risk Management â A Training of Trainers ... - ReliefWeb

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?

Flash Flood Risk Management â A Training of Trainers ... - ReliefWeb