National Healthcare Disparities Report - LDI Health Economist

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Priority Populations References Adler NE, Newman K. Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health Aff (Project Hope) 2002 Mar- Apr;21(2):60-76. Bishaw A, Macartney S. Poverty: 2008 and 2009. American Community Survey Briefs. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau; September 2010. Publication No. ACSBR/09-1. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/acsbr09-1.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2011. Brown AF, Gross AG, Gutierrez PR, et al. Income-related differences in the use of evidence-based therapies in older persons with diabetes mellitus in for-profit managed care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003 May;51(5):665-70. Chapter 10 Collins K, Hughes D, Doty M, et al. Diverse communities, common concerns: assessing health care quality for minority Americans. New York: Commonwealth Fund; 2002. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor B, Smith J. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2008. Current Population Reports. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau; 2009. Publication No. P60-236(RV). Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/p60-236.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2010. Executive Office of the President. Revisions to the standards for the classification of Federal data on race and ethnicity. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget; 1997. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/race/Ombdir15.html. Accessed on August 24, 2011. Fast facts on U.S. hospitals. [Data from the 2009 annual survey]. Chicago: American Hospital Association; 2011. Available at: http://www.aha.org/aha/resource-center/Statistics-and-Studies/fast-facts.html. Accessed August 24, 2011. Geography of frontier America: the view at the turn of the century. Sante Fe, NM: Frontier Education Center; 2000. Grant, JM, Mottet LA, Tanis J, et al. National Transgender Discrimination Survey report on health and health care. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force; 2011. Improving health care for rural populations. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (now Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality); 1996. Publication No. AHCPR 96-P040. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/rural.htm. Accessed November 14, 2008. Institute of Medicine, Board of Health Care Services. Race, ethnicity, and language data: standardization for health care quality improvement. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010. Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Future of Rural Health Care. Quality through collaboration: the future of rural health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001. Available at: http:// www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/. Accessed August 27, 2009. LaPlante MP. The demographics of disability. Milbank Q 1991;69 (Suppl 1-2):55-77. Larson SL, Fleishman JA. Rural-urban differences in usual source of care and ambulatory service use: analyses of national data using Urban Influence Codes. Med Care 2003 Jul;41(7 Suppl):III65-III74. Lillie-Blanton M, Rushing OE, Ruiz S. Key facts: race, ethnicity, and medical care. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2003. Available at: http://www.kff.org/minorityhealth/upload/Key-Facts-Race-Ethnicity-Medical-Care- Chartbook.pdf. Accessed November 11, 2008. Poverty rate by race/ethnicity, States (2009-2010), U.S. (2010). Washington, DC: Uban Institute and Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. Available at: http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparebar.jspind=14&cat=1. Accessed February 14, 2012. Poverty thresholds. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau; 2011b. Available at: http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/11poverty.shtml. Accessed on August 24, 2011. Rosenblatt RA, Chen FM, Lishner DM, et al. The future of family medicine and implications for rural primary care physician supply. Final Report #125. Seattle, WA: WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, University of Washington; August 2010. Available at: http://depts.washington.edu/uwrhrc/uploads/RHRC_FR125_Rosenblatt.pdf. 246 National Healthcare Disparities Report, 2011
Priority Populations Smedley B, Stith A, Nelson AR, eds. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care; 2003. The Surgeon General’s call to action to improve the health and wellness of people with disabilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 2005. U.S. Census Bureau. 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 decennial censuses; population projections, July 1, 2010 to July 1, 2050. Released February 8, 2008. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/hispanic_pop_presentation.html. Accessed July 19, 2011. USA QuickFacts. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau; 2011a. Available at: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html. Accessed July 19, 2011. Ziller EC, Coburn AF, Loux SL, et al. Health insurance coverage in rural America. Washington, DC: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured; 2003. Available at: http://www.kff.org/uninsured/4093.cfm. Accessed August 24, 2011. Chapter 10 National Healthcare Disparities Report, 2011 247
Page 1:
NATIONAL HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES REP
Page 4 and 5:
Acknowledgments The NHQR and NHDR a
Page 6 and 7:
National Healthcare Disparities Rep
Page 8 and 9:
Highlights New this year, the Highl
Page 10 and 11:
Highlights n Disparities in quality
Page 12 and 13:
Highlights n Quality is improving s
Page 14 and 15:
Highlights Figure H.6. Number and p
Page 16 and 17:
Highlights Table H.2. Quality measu
Page 18 and 19:
Highlights n Disparities also chang
Page 20 and 21:
Highlights Figure H.9. Income-relat
Page 22 and 23:
Highlights Progress in Patient Safe
Page 24 and 25:
Highlights available to the public
Page 26 and 27:
Highlights Examples of Initiatives
Page 28 and 29:
Highlights Provider: When referring
Page 30 and 31:
Highlights State: The Ohio Plan To
Page 32 and 33:
Highlights Figure H.15. Number and
Page 34 and 35:
Highlights to have high health care
Page 36 and 37:
Highlights n Data on disparities ar
Page 38 and 39:
Highlights share experiences and di
Page 40 and 41:
Highlights References Andrulis DP,
Page 42 and 43:
Introduction and Methods With rapid
Page 44 and 45:
Introduction and Methods a new sect
Page 46 and 47:
Introduction and Methods Table 1.2.
Page 48 and 49:
Introduction and Methods antibiotic
Page 50 and 51:
Introduction and Methods Progress o
Page 52 and 53:
Introduction and Methods n Trends o
Page 54 and 55:
Introduction and Methods Reporting
Page 56 and 57:
Effectiveness of Care Cancer Import
Page 58 and 59:
Effectiveness of Care Chapter 2 Can
Page 60 and 61:
Effectiveness of Care Treatment: Re
Page 62 and 63:
Effectiveness of Care Also, in the
Page 64 and 65:
Effectiveness of Care Importance Ca
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Effectiveness of Care Chapter 2 Car
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Effectiveness of Care Chronic Kidne
Page 74 and 75:
Effectiveness of Care Figure 2.13.
Page 76 and 77:
Effectiveness of Care Diabetes Impo
Page 78 and 79:
Effectiveness of Care Multivariate
Page 80 and 81:
Effectiveness of Care Focus on Indi
Page 82 and 83:
Effectiveness of Care HIV and AIDS
Page 84 and 85:
Effectiveness of Care To normalize
Page 86 and 87:
Effectiveness of Care HIV/AIDS core
Page 88 and 89:
Effectiveness of Care Outcome: Deat
Page 90 and 91:
Effectiveness of Care Findings NEW
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Effectiveness of Care Prevention: W
Page 98 and 99:
Effectiveness of Care Mental Health
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Effectiveness of Care NEW Musculosk
Page 106 and 107:
Effectiveness of Care n In all year
Page 108 and 109:
Effectiveness of Care NEW Managemen
Page 110 and 111:
Effectiveness of Care Findings Prev
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Effectiveness of Care Chapter 2 Res
Page 116 and 117:
Effectiveness of Care Lifestyle Mod
Page 118 and 119:
Effectiveness of Care n In 5 out of
Page 120 and 121:
Effectiveness of Care NEW Outcome:
Page 122 and 123:
Effectiveness of Care Chapter 2 Lif
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Effectiveness of Care Functional St
Page 128 and 129:
Effectiveness of Care Chapter 2 Fun
Page 130 and 131:
Effectiveness of Care at admission
Page 132 and 133:
Effectiveness of Care Supportive an
Page 134 and 135:
Effectiveness of Care n The 2008 to
Page 136 and 137:
Effectiveness of Care Chapter 2 Sup
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Effectiveness of Care References 20
Page 142 and 143:
Effectiveness of Care Centers for M
Page 144 and 145:
Effectiveness of Care Oral health i
Page 146 and 147:
140 National Healthcare Disparities
Page 148 and 149:
Patient Safety To Err Is Human does
Page 150 and 151:
Patient Safety Figure 3.1. Adult su
Page 152 and 153:
Patient Safety Also, in the NHQR: n
Page 154 and 155:
Patient Safety n From 2006-2007 to
Page 156 and 157:
Patient Safety n From 2004 to 2008,
Page 158 and 159:
Patient Safety Chapter 3 n From 200
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Timeliness Findings Getting Care fo
Page 164 and 165:
Timeliness Chapter 4 n Not all pati
Page 166 and 167:
Timeliness Chapter 4 n Among heart
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Patient Centeredness Chapter 5 Simi
Page 172 and 173:
Patient Centeredness Figure 5.1. Ad
Page 174 and 175:
Patient Centeredness Figure 5.3. Ch
Page 176 and 177:
Patient Centeredness Figure 5.5. Ad
Page 178 and 179:
Patient Centeredness Patient Langua
Page 180 and 181:
Patient Centeredness Information ab
Page 182 and 183:
Patient Centeredness Providers Aski
Page 184 and 185:
178 National Healthcare Quality Rep
Page 186 and 187:
Care Coordination Importance Chapte
Page 188 and 189:
Care Coordination n In 2009, Americ
Page 190 and 191:
Care Coordination Figure 6.3. Paren
Page 192 and 193:
Care Coordination Also, in the NHQR
Page 194 and 195:
Care Coordination Chapter 6 n Overa
Page 196 and 197:
Care Coordination Chapter 6 n Overa
Page 198 and 199:
Efficiency Findings Chapter 7 Inapp
Page 200 and 201:
Efficiency Figure 7.2. Potentially
Page 202 and 203: Efficiency Comparisons with the 3 S
Page 204 and 205: Efficiency Perforated Appendixes Pe
Page 206 and 207: Efficiency Figure 7.8. Males age 75
Page 208 and 209: 202 National Healthcare Disparities
Page 210 and 211: Health System Infrastructure Eviden
Page 212 and 213: Health System Infrastructure Figure
Page 214 and 215: Health System Infrastructure Figure
Page 216 and 217: Health System Infrastructure Occupa
Page 218 and 219: Health System Infrastructure n From
Page 220 and 221: Health System Infrastructure NEW Co
Page 222 and 223: Health System Infrastructure Table
Page 224 and 225: Health System Infrastructure Refere
Page 226 and 227: Access to Health Care Findings Heal
Page 228 and 229: Access to Health Care Figure 9.2. P
Page 232 and 233: Access to Health Care Financial Bur
Page 234 and 235: Access to Health Care Chapter 9 n O
Page 238 and 239: Priority Populations Chapter 10 232
Page 240 and 241: Priority Populations AHRQ’s Prior
Page 242 and 243: Priority Populations Blacks or Afri
Page 244 and 245: Priority Populations Hispanics or L
Page 246 and 247: Priority Populations Geographic are
Page 248 and 249: Priority Populations criminal justi
Page 250 and 251: Priority Populations Postponement R
Page 254 and 255: 248 National Healthcare Disparities
Page 256: U.S. Department of Health and Human
show all

National Healthcare Disparities Report - LDI Health Economist

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?