Environmental Impact Assessment(EIA) Registration for the ...
Environmental Impact Assessment(EIA) Registration for the ...
Environmental Impact Assessment(EIA) Registration for the ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (<strong>EIA</strong>) REGISTRATION<br />
FOR THE NEPISIGUIT FALLS GENERATING STATION MODIFICATION AND REHABILITATION PROJECT<br />
2.6 ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT<br />
At <strong>the</strong> planning phase of <strong>the</strong> Project, NB Power considered two alternative means of carrying<br />
out <strong>the</strong> Project, with consideration to design requirements, construction logistics, potential<br />
environmental interaction, and feasibility.<br />
This section presents an overview of <strong>the</strong> alternatives considered <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Project and a<br />
comparison of <strong>the</strong>ir characteristics in terms of: creating a safe and reliable work environment;<br />
construction scheduling; and potential environmental effects.<br />
2.6.1 Preferred Option (use of Coffer Dam)<br />
The Preferred Option described in Section 2.2 above involves <strong>the</strong> use of a Coffer Dam and<br />
conducting repairs under wet conditions. This option offers <strong>the</strong> following features:<br />
• it does not require a full dewatering or re-watering of <strong>the</strong> headpond;<br />
• it reduces potential harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat<br />
and <strong>the</strong> associated authorization and compensation processes which would o<strong>the</strong>rwise<br />
result from dewatering of <strong>the</strong> headpond;<br />
• it reduces <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>for</strong> substantial sediment suspension in <strong>the</strong> Nepisiguit River, and<br />
thus <strong>the</strong> movement of potentially contaminated sediment is also reduced;<br />
• it provides a safe, dry work area <strong>for</strong> completion of <strong>the</strong> trash rack and intake deck<br />
replacement; and<br />
• it will be conducted in a manner which will allow time during Construction <strong>for</strong> fish to<br />
move out of <strong>the</strong> construction area.<br />
However, this option has a higher overall construction cost than o<strong>the</strong>r alternatives considered.<br />
When considered against potential environmental effects, construction logistics, health and<br />
safety, and in consultation with DFO and NBENV, <strong>the</strong> Preferred Option has been identified by<br />
NB Power as <strong>the</strong> best means of completing <strong>the</strong> Project in <strong>the</strong> least environmentally intrusive<br />
manner possible.<br />
This option requires minimal lowering of headpond levels. With proper mitigation <strong>for</strong> sediment,<br />
<strong>the</strong> potential <strong>for</strong> adverse environmental effects as a result of sedimentation, <strong>the</strong> movement of<br />
potentially contaminated sediment, and direct environmental effects to fish and fish habitat are<br />
reduced. Dual use of <strong>the</strong> Coffer Dam as a barrier <strong>for</strong> water and as an access road will provide<br />
similar access to <strong>the</strong> spillway dam as <strong>the</strong> alternative option, and all o<strong>the</strong>r work will proceed as<br />
with <strong>the</strong> alternative option (e.g., work on <strong>the</strong> spillway dam will be undertaken from a plat<strong>for</strong>m,<br />
trash rack replacement will be carried out in dry conditions).<br />
June 15, 2011 Page 21