04.01.2015 Views

Learning Across Sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices - Earli

Learning Across Sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices - Earli

Learning Across Sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices - Earli

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For EARLI members only.<br />

Not for onward distribution.<br />

10 S. Ludvigsen et al.<br />

knowledge construction in a cross- disciplinary project <strong>and</strong> with an ethical dilemma<br />

as the point of departure. The key concept in this chapter is the emerging object.<br />

The chapter gives a strong empirical account of how a group of learners collaborate<br />

<strong>and</strong> how they orient themselves towards the object <strong>and</strong> its representations in the<br />

classroom <strong>and</strong> with diverse technological resources at h<strong>and</strong>.<br />

In Chapter 14, by Andriessen, Baker, <strong>and</strong> van der Puil, the concept of argumentation<br />

is in focus. The focus on explicit argumentation <strong>and</strong> dialogue is growing as an<br />

analytic perspective in research <strong>and</strong> as an instructional way of improving students’<br />

competence in different knowledge domains. The authors make a detailed analysis<br />

of how students perform a task in a computer- supported learning environment<br />

<strong>and</strong> where micro- conflicts is their key analytic concept.<br />

In higher- education settings, Dysthe, Lillejord, Wasson, <strong>and</strong> Vines analyze<br />

“productive learning” with the ambition of showing how it ties into a cluster of<br />

concepts that concern activity <strong>and</strong> transformation. They investigate how the dialectic<br />

relationship between processes <strong>and</strong> products constitutes a relational space – or<br />

zone. Two case studies support their investigation, <strong>and</strong> they find that students in<br />

higher education benefit from being exposed to the divergent voices <strong>and</strong> conflicting<br />

perspectives of the research community.<br />

Institutional development<br />

Changing <strong>practices</strong> cannot be properly understood without taking the culturalhistorical<br />

trajectories of institutions into consideration. A closer look at this often<br />

under- investigated aspect of human cognition <strong>and</strong> development is provided in<br />

several of the contributions in this volume, but in the following chapters such<br />

trajectories are in focus.<br />

In the chapter by Schwartz <strong>and</strong> de Groot, a joint institutional developmental<br />

process between educational designers, teachers <strong>and</strong> researchers is documented.<br />

This developmental process leads to several breakdowns, which create new opportunities<br />

for learning to occur. <strong>New</strong> types of learning designs are accounted for in<br />

this chapter. The empirical context is in- service training for teachers.<br />

In Chapter 17, Barnes <strong>and</strong> Sutherl<strong>and</strong> investigate two important issues that<br />

concern how schools can develop more productive learning trajectories. Based on<br />

partnerships with schools <strong>and</strong> teachers, the authors have developed new <strong>tools</strong> for<br />

analyzing the teacher’s <strong>practices</strong>. This is done in collaboration with the teachers,<br />

so the <strong>tools</strong> <strong>and</strong> ways of analyzing classroom interaction are more attuned to the<br />

teachers’ work <strong>practices</strong>.<br />

Erstad examines how multiliterate <strong>practices</strong> emerge <strong>and</strong> what the role of digital<br />

technologies is. The empirical data comes from different sources. The survey data is<br />

related to a large- scale ICT- based reform in Norway, <strong>and</strong> the corpus of qualitative<br />

data is based on a longitudinal study where the schools were followed over four<br />

years. The study is what we could call a multilevel study, where different research<br />

perspectives are deployed to underst<strong>and</strong> how schools develop when different types<br />

of ICTs are introduced <strong>and</strong> used over time.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!