04.01.2015 Views

Learning Across Sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices - Earli

Learning Across Sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices - Earli

Learning Across Sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices - Earli

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For EARLI members only.<br />

Not for onward distribution.<br />

Weaving the context of digital literacy 307<br />

classroom. All this weaves together when studying digital literacy as social practice<br />

<strong>and</strong> the pedagogical use of ICT in schools.<br />

As shown above, the major challenges for the schools in the PILOT project<br />

were related to how they dealt with changes in the contextual constraints when<br />

ICT was implemented <strong>and</strong> used in the school practice. This project illustrates the<br />

importance of seeing these constraints on different levels within the school community<br />

in order to establish new literacy <strong>practices</strong> by using digital technologies.<br />

In this way we need to ab<strong>and</strong>on the notion of literacy as a set of disembodied<br />

skills, <strong>and</strong> to recognize that literacies are always inevitably situated within specific<br />

<strong>practices</strong> <strong>and</strong> specific social contexts, what some educationalists term a social theory<br />

of media literacy (Street, 1984; Buckingham, 2003).<br />

Literacy <strong>and</strong> citizenship in the digital age<br />

I have used activity theory <strong>and</strong> different levels at which activities can be analysed<br />

as an approach to studying digital literacy as something more than a specific set of<br />

skills. This approach was then related to different aspects of context as important for<br />

studying digital literacy in schools. In addition, ‘mediated action’ <strong>and</strong> mastery <strong>and</strong><br />

appropriation were used as a way of stating the connection between technological<br />

development <strong>and</strong> issues of literacies in the way people use the technology.<br />

There is a real danger today that both policy- makers <strong>and</strong> research initiatives see<br />

‘digital literacy’ as just being able to use the technology in school- based learning,<br />

as shown by different initiatives of developing st<strong>and</strong>ards for digital literacy. If using<br />

computers in schools is just seen as a skill <strong>and</strong> cognitive tool, the appropriation of<br />

how such <strong>tools</strong> can enhance learning will not be taken up by the students. I see<br />

activity theory as a theoretical framework for exp<strong>and</strong>ing our conceptual underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

of such literacies. These theoretical perspectives will allow us to develop a<br />

multilevel approach, combining institutional effects <strong>and</strong> theories of mind (Olson,<br />

2003), to ‘digital literacy’ as part of school- based learning.<br />

The social <strong>and</strong> cultural developments we experience today point to the importance<br />

of digital literacy as a social practice with huge implications for being considered<br />

a citizen in the digital society, with its emphasis on information, knowledge <strong>and</strong><br />

networks. As Gunter Kress (2003) has pointed out, the development of media<br />

technologies affects what new kinds of literacies may be developing, <strong>and</strong> what types<br />

of meanings, cultural effects <strong>and</strong> transformations they will produce, as well as the<br />

question of the likely distribution of access to or exclusion from these literacies.<br />

Within educational settings it is print that traditionally has been at the centre of<br />

knowledge- production, <strong>and</strong> literacy has often been conceived as a collection of<br />

culturally independent cognitive skills. <strong>Learning</strong> to read <strong>and</strong> write was associated<br />

with a particular kind of cognitive development, through which people became<br />

more logical, analytical, rational <strong>and</strong> ‘civilized’. One unfortunate consequence is<br />

drawing a distinction between the literate <strong>and</strong> the illiterate, <strong>and</strong> between the media<br />

<strong>and</strong> education as competitors in the reproduction of culture <strong>and</strong> the formation of<br />

social <strong>and</strong> cultural subjects.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!