06.01.2015 Views

The Real And Complex Number Systems

The Real And Complex Number Systems

The Real And Complex Number Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Without loss of generality, we assume that p a and q b. Claim that f is strictly<br />

decreasing on a, b.<br />

Suppose NOT, then there exist x, y a, b, with x y such that fx fy. (""<br />

does not hold since f is 1-1.) Consider x, y and by above method, we know that f| x,y has<br />

the maximum at y, andf| a,y has the minimum at y. <strong>The</strong>n it implies that there exists<br />

By; x, y such that f is constant on By; x, y, which contradicts to 1-1. Hence,<br />

for any x y a, b, wehavefx fy. ("" does not hold since f is 1-1.) So, we<br />

have proved that f is strictly decreasing on a, b.<br />

Reamrk: 1. Here is another proof by Exercise 4.61. It suffices to show that 1-1 and<br />

continuity imply that f does not have a local maximum or a local minimum at any interior<br />

point.<br />

Proof: Suppose NOT, it means that f has a local extremum at some interior point x.<br />

Without loss of generality, we assume that f has a local minimum at the interior point x.<br />

Since x is an interior point of a, b, then there exists an open interval<br />

x , x a, b such that fy fx for all y x , x . Note that f is 1-1, so<br />

we have fy fx for all y x , x x. Choose y 1 x and<br />

y 2 x, x , then we have fy 1 fx and fy 2 fx. <strong>And</strong> thus choose r so that<br />

fy 1 r fx fp r, wherep y 1 , x by Intermediate Value <strong>The</strong>orem,<br />

fy 2 r fx fq r, whereq x, y 2 by Intermediate Value <strong>The</strong>orem,<br />

which contradicts to the hypothesis that f is 1-1. Hence, we have proved that 1-1 and<br />

continuity imply that f does not have a local maximum or a local minimum at any interior<br />

point.<br />

2. Under the assumption of continuity on a compact interval, one-to-one is<br />

equivalent to being strictly monotonic.<br />

Proof: By the exercise, we know that an one-to-one and continuous function defined<br />

on a compact interval implies that a strictly monotonic function. So, it remains to show that<br />

a strictly monotonic function implies that an one-to-one function. Without loss of<br />

generality, let f be increasing on a, b, then as fx fy, we must have x y since if<br />

x y, then fx fy and if x y, then fx fy. So, we have proved that a strictly<br />

monotonic function implies that an one-to-one function. Hence, we get that under the<br />

assumption of continuity on a compact interval, one-to-one is equivalent to being strictly<br />

monotonic.<br />

4.63 Let f be an increasing function defined on a, b and let x 1 ,..,x n be n points in<br />

the interior such that a x 1 x 2 ... x n b.<br />

n<br />

(a) Show that k1<br />

fx k fx k fb fa .<br />

Proof: Let a x 0 and b x n1 ;sincef is an increasing function defined on a, b, we<br />

know that both fx k and fx k exist for 1 k n. Assume that y k x k , x k1 , then<br />

we have fy k fx k and fx k1 fy k1 . Hence,<br />

n<br />

<br />

k1<br />

fx k fx k fy k fy k1 <br />

n<br />

k1<br />

fy n fy 0 <br />

fb fa .<br />

(b) Deduce from part (a) that the set of dicontinuities of f is countable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!