The Real And Complex Number Systems
The Real And Complex Number Systems
The Real And Complex Number Systems
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Without loss of generality, we assume that p a and q b. Claim that f is strictly<br />
decreasing on a, b.<br />
Suppose NOT, then there exist x, y a, b, with x y such that fx fy. (""<br />
does not hold since f is 1-1.) Consider x, y and by above method, we know that f| x,y has<br />
the maximum at y, andf| a,y has the minimum at y. <strong>The</strong>n it implies that there exists<br />
By; x, y such that f is constant on By; x, y, which contradicts to 1-1. Hence,<br />
for any x y a, b, wehavefx fy. ("" does not hold since f is 1-1.) So, we<br />
have proved that f is strictly decreasing on a, b.<br />
Reamrk: 1. Here is another proof by Exercise 4.61. It suffices to show that 1-1 and<br />
continuity imply that f does not have a local maximum or a local minimum at any interior<br />
point.<br />
Proof: Suppose NOT, it means that f has a local extremum at some interior point x.<br />
Without loss of generality, we assume that f has a local minimum at the interior point x.<br />
Since x is an interior point of a, b, then there exists an open interval<br />
x , x a, b such that fy fx for all y x , x . Note that f is 1-1, so<br />
we have fy fx for all y x , x x. Choose y 1 x and<br />
y 2 x, x , then we have fy 1 fx and fy 2 fx. <strong>And</strong> thus choose r so that<br />
fy 1 r fx fp r, wherep y 1 , x by Intermediate Value <strong>The</strong>orem,<br />
fy 2 r fx fq r, whereq x, y 2 by Intermediate Value <strong>The</strong>orem,<br />
which contradicts to the hypothesis that f is 1-1. Hence, we have proved that 1-1 and<br />
continuity imply that f does not have a local maximum or a local minimum at any interior<br />
point.<br />
2. Under the assumption of continuity on a compact interval, one-to-one is<br />
equivalent to being strictly monotonic.<br />
Proof: By the exercise, we know that an one-to-one and continuous function defined<br />
on a compact interval implies that a strictly monotonic function. So, it remains to show that<br />
a strictly monotonic function implies that an one-to-one function. Without loss of<br />
generality, let f be increasing on a, b, then as fx fy, we must have x y since if<br />
x y, then fx fy and if x y, then fx fy. So, we have proved that a strictly<br />
monotonic function implies that an one-to-one function. Hence, we get that under the<br />
assumption of continuity on a compact interval, one-to-one is equivalent to being strictly<br />
monotonic.<br />
4.63 Let f be an increasing function defined on a, b and let x 1 ,..,x n be n points in<br />
the interior such that a x 1 x 2 ... x n b.<br />
n<br />
(a) Show that k1<br />
fx k fx k fb fa .<br />
Proof: Let a x 0 and b x n1 ;sincef is an increasing function defined on a, b, we<br />
know that both fx k and fx k exist for 1 k n. Assume that y k x k , x k1 , then<br />
we have fy k fx k and fx k1 fy k1 . Hence,<br />
n<br />
<br />
k1<br />
fx k fx k fy k fy k1 <br />
n<br />
k1<br />
fy n fy 0 <br />
fb fa .<br />
(b) Deduce from part (a) that the set of dicontinuities of f is countable.