06.01.2015 Views

The Real And Complex Number Systems

The Real And Complex Number Systems

The Real And Complex Number Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

W x <br />

f 1 f 2 ... f n<br />

... ... ... ...<br />

f 1<br />

n2<br />

f 1<br />

n<br />

f 2<br />

n2<br />

f 2<br />

n<br />

... f n<br />

n2<br />

... f n<br />

n<br />

.<br />

(b) Assuming the existence of n constants c 1 ,...,c n , not all zero, such that<br />

c 1 f 1 x ...c n f n x 0 for every x in a, b, show that Wx 0 for each x in a, b.<br />

Proof: Since c 1 f 1 x ...c n f n x 0 for every x in a, b, wherec 1 ,...,c n , not all<br />

zero. Without loss of generality, we may assume c 1 0, we know that<br />

c 1 f k 1 x ...c n f k n x 0 for every x in a, b, where 0 k n. Hence, we have<br />

Wx <br />

f 1 f 2 ... f n<br />

f 1 f 2 ... f<br />

n<br />

... ... ... ...<br />

f 1<br />

n1<br />

f 2<br />

n1<br />

... f n<br />

n1<br />

0<br />

since the first column is a linear combination of other columns.<br />

Note. A set of functions satisfing such a relation is said to be a linearly dependent set<br />

on a, b.<br />

(c) <strong>The</strong> vanishing of the Wronskian throughout a, b is necessary, but not sufficient.<br />

for linear dependence of f 1 ,...,f n . Show that in the case of two functions, if the Wronskian<br />

vanishes throughout a, b and if one of the functions does not vanish in a, b, then they<br />

form a linearly dependent set in a, b.<br />

Proof: Let f and g be continuous and differentiable on a, b. Suppose that fx 0for<br />

all x a, b. Since the Wronskian of f and g is 0, for all x a, b, wehave<br />

fg f g 0 for all x a, b. *<br />

Since fx 0 for all x a, b, wehaveby(*),<br />

fg f g<br />

0 g <br />

0 for all x a, b.<br />

f 2 f<br />

Hence, there is a constant c such that g cf for all x a, b. Hence, f, g forms a<br />

linearly dependent set.<br />

Remark: This exercise in (b) is a impotant theorem on O.D.E. We often write (b) in<br />

other form as follows.<br />

(<strong>The</strong>orem) Letf 1 ,..,f n be continuous and differentiable on an interval I. If<br />

Wf 1 ,...,f n t 0 0forsomet 0 I, then f 1 ,..,f n is linearly independent on I<br />

Note: If f 1 ,..,f n is linearly independent on I, ItisNOT necessary that<br />

Wf 1 ,...,f n t 0 0forsomet 0 I. For example, ft t 2 |t|, andgt t 3 . It is easy to<br />

check f, g is linearly independent on 1, 1. <strong>And</strong>Wf, gt 0 for all t 1, 1.<br />

Supplement on Chain Rule and Inverse Function <strong>The</strong>orem.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following theorem is called chain rule, it is well-known that let f be defined on an<br />

open interval S, letg be defined on fS, and consider the composite function g f defined<br />

on S by the equation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!